Filter
Gatwick Airport Northern Runway

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 3601 to 3625 of 4813 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Martin Arnold Hills

    This application will promote further expansion of a highly polluting mode of transport. In view of the governments 'Net Zero' targets and climate change, is it either advisable or acceptable?

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Martin Steibelt

    I live almost directly under the flight path and planes pass over us at about 1 minute intervals about 75% of the time [when the wind blows from the west]. The amount of noise polution is already... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Matthew Allcock

    Uk should be committed to making London net zero by 2030 and reducing air pollution. The aviation sector needs to play a part in this and not undermine our efforts to achieve this goal. I fail to see... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Mattias Bjornfors

    I fully support the the Gatwick Northern runway project. It represents an excellent private investment in the local area that will bring substantial benefits likely to greatly exceed costs as assessed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Michaela Catherall

    This project has not considered the impact on communities surrounding the airport for increased traffic , noise pollution, lack of housing and infrastructure, and also to obtain a second runway by... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Mr Antonio Larraz

    I oppose the second runway due to the inevitable additional noise and the extra traffic that it will generate in the local area on roads that are often gridlocked

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Mr Christopher Chandler

    Quite happy for the project to go ahead

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Mr Jordan M C Lewis

    I am a resident, I have lived locally my entire life and I oppose the proposals from Gatwick. The claims about them being a good local employer are laughable. They have stripped that airport and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Mrs Anne Golds

    I object to the further expansion of Gatwick. Extra noise pollution: already many homes and villages are subjected to loud, regular aircraft passing overhead. This would increase substantially.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Mrs Elizabeth Whitmarsh

    I strongly object to this proposed project for the following reasons: NOISE: My property is constantly exposed to aircraft noise flying directly on the overhead flight path above it. These occur... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Nancy Campbell

    Carbon emissions Noise pollution Not enough space

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Neil Barrington-Johnson

    The current noise levels over(Redacted) from flight arrivals to Gatwick Airport are already at an unacceptable level. These proposals would markedly exacerbate that already unacceptable situation.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Nicholas Marks

    Providing new infrastructure to support the further expansion of flight-based travel and tourism seems to deny the existence of climate change, or at least ignore the reasons for it.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Nick Cornford

    The noise pollution is already distressing with a majority of planes circling over our property as they stack to land. I can only foresee this issue getting worse should a further runway be approved.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Niki Tomlinson

    I don’t believe there is a good enough reason to pollute the air further than is happening already. Flight paths and road traffic already impinge on my day to day life, more road traffic in the local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Patricia Smith

    It is very noisy at night especially and every day in nice weather hard to sit in our garde feels like they are very low when planes coming into land and keeping us awake at night it will be even... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Patrick Prifti

    * NOISE I understand the proposals for Gatwick would allow it to grow to the size of Heathrow. The amount of air traffic noise is currently unbearable, particularly in the spring/summer/autumn months,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Paul Marson-Smith

    Turning the emergency runway into a full time runway will further increase aircraft noise disturbance from its already unacceptable levels. Furthermore, there is a significant safety concern.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Peter Alan Wilcox

    It goes against all the efforts to reduce green house gasses both directly, aircraft emissions and indirectly by the added vehicular traffic and its associated pollution. It compounds an existing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Rachel Foggitt

    I strongly oppose the expansion of Gatwick. It is an environmental disaster to increase air traffic in terms of the contribution to global heating which is now reaching crisis points. It will increase... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Richard Martin

    I support the development of the northern runway at Gatwick provided that, if it goes ahead, it will eliminate the need for a new runway at Heathrow. This is on the assumption that the cost of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Richard Matthews

    I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – • Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Roberta Brockman

    I am concerned about the increased carbon emissions along with additional noise and pollution which will be suffered by people living nearby. Net 0 requires fewer flights and we should be working on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Robin Stuart Andrews

    the noise is at the top of the objection the smell of aviation fuel is another

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023

  • Rosalind Lunberg

    I object to the increase in noise and air pollution that will be over Horley Reigate & Redhill. It is incompatible with climate change targets & reducing air pollution and CO2 emissions to net zero

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 November 2023