Representation by Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail Infrastructure Limited)
- Date submitted
- 31 March 2021
- Submitted by
- Other statutory consultees
This is a summary of the response of Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail) to the section 56 notification. Network Rail's full response is provided in a separate document. We ask that that the Examining Authority refer to the full response. Network Rail recognises the role that the rail network can play in supporting and facilitating sustainable visitor and staff movements to, and from, the London Resort (the Resort). However, The London Resort Development Consent Order, in the form currently proposed, does not include appropriate mitigation measures and safeguards to ensure the safe and efficient continued operation of the rail network. The full response explains: 1. The impact of the proposed development on local stations (excluding HS1 stations), including: a. The need for enhancements to be delivered at Swanscombe station ahead of the Resort opening, and the absence of a commitment to deliver those enhancements. b. The need for further assessment to understand, amongst other things, whether any wider interventions are needed to support the increased rail demand, the railway maintenance implications of the proposals, and the timetabling implications of the additional loading of passengers on to the network. 2. The need a financial contribution towards the Ebbsfleet Southern link. 3. The impact on the HS1 network insofar as it impacts on the Network Rail network, and in particular: a. The impact on the wider network of running 12 car trains; b. The depot implications of introducing any new rolling stock to accommodate a dedicated shuttle service; and c. The potential impact of the proposals on Network Rail assets which are needed for the HS1 network. 4. The impact on Network Rail operations at Tilbury. 5. The importance of asset protection measures and the need for: a. The applicant to commit to entering into any asset protection agreement(s) and any other documents required by Network Rail for the benefit and protection of its railway; and b. Network Rail to be confident that the proposals will not compromise its duties to operate, maintain, renew and inspect its railway. 6. Network's objection to the compulsory acquisition or use of any land in which it has an interest. Network Rail also notes that part of the land is safeguarded for the Crossrail extension. 7. The need for protective provisions in its favour to be include in the Order. 8. The intended further consideration of environmental implications in respect of its own land. Please see attached