Representation by Isobel Steen
- Date submitted
- 27 January 2020
- Submitted by
- Members of the public/businesses
I support the development of renewable energy resources and accept the role that offshore wind plays. But I object to Scottish Power Renewables' (SPR's) proposed onshore infrastructure associated with East Anglia One North and East Anglia Two windfarms. With a minimum onshore construction period of between 4 to 8 years for SPR'S and National Grid's associated works, Friston and surrounding communities, and wildlife, will suffer severe and unacceptable disruption. The proposed complex is unacceptable in a rural, non-industrial setting, adjacent to a small village whose population is mainly of pensionable age. The village includes listed buildings, such as Friston Church and Friston Windmill, reputedly the tallest post mill in the UK. It is anticipated that there will be an audible, constant hum from the substations. Noise pollution is unacceptable. Initial consultation suggested that the site will be illuminated 24 hours a day, at least during the construction period. The impact on local residents, and fauna, particularly bats and owls, has not been addressed. SPR has failed to adequately demonstrate appropriate flood mitigation for surface water run-off from the substation sites. Existing watercourses quickly reach capacity. It is unclear how SPR proposes to successfully manage this situation. SPR has stated that screening of the substation site by tree planting will be largely effective within 15 years. This is highly unlikely and who will be responsible for nurturing the trees whilst they become established? I object to the felling of the ancient woodland at Aldringham. The AONB through which the cable corridor will pass is by definition both special and fragile and I believe SPR's proposed mitigation measures to be inadequate. Particularly fragile is the area around the landfall site at Thorpeness. The cumulative impact on the local road infrastructure has not been adequately addressed. On all roads there is limited footpaths meaning both cyclists and pedestrians will be in acute danger. Loss of tourism will negatively impact on the local economy.