Back to list Sunnica Energy Farm

Representation by Kate Hogg

Date submitted
16 March 2022
Submitted by
Members of the public/businesses

Transport and access: There is a lack of evidence supporting assumptions made and conclusions to assessments provided and several impacts are not sufficiently assessed. Cultural heritage archaeology: The project’s archaeological mitigation strategy is currently vague and requires development Ecology and nature conservation: the environment statement provides inadequate detail in its assessments and more supporting information and clarification is required. Flood risk, drainage and water resources: There is a lack of data to evidence the feasibility of measures proposed, and more detail of the sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) features is required. Safety: long term impact of batteries near residential areas