Representation by Keith Nichols
- Date submitted
- 14 October 2022
- Submitted by
- Members of the public/businesses
Boundary of proposed corridor is too close to my property (>18metres) and we have concerns about noise disruption, subsidence, wildlife impact and EMF levels amongst other things. Our property is off Sandy Hill Lane and we understand that our entry/exit access will be blocked for extended periods which is unacceptable. We believe that a route slightly further east than proposed (plan 03-008-04-015) would be less disruptive/intrusive and offer easier access than what is proposed. The proposed landfall site will adversely impact the residents and businesses of Weybourne. Making landfall further east would offer a more direct route avoiding roads and residential areas. A roughly straight line north from 04-017 and 04-016 to the coast would avoid the proposed "westerly dog-leg" through residential areas, Weybourne Railway station and Weybourne village.