Representation by Aleksei Sysoev
- Date submitted
- 13 June 2024
- Submitted by
- Members of the public/businesses
To Whom It May Concern, I am writing as a concerned resident who values the preservation of our natural habitats and the inherent biodiversity they support. While I recognize the importance of reaching net zero goals and the potential benefits of decarbonisation technologies, I must express my strong objection to Cory's proposal to build a decarbonisation plant on a portion of the Crossness Nature Reserve. Crossness Nature Reserve is a vital ecological haven that provides a sanctuary for a wide range of flora and fauna. The 25 hectares of land designated under a Section 106 agreement were specifically allocated to ensure the conservation of natural habitats and to support biodiversity. The compulsory purchase of 11.7% of this land for industrial use contradicts the very purpose of the reserve and threatens the delicate ecosystems that have flourished there. The construction and operation of a decarbonisation plant, despite its intended environmental benefits, will inevitably lead to habitat destruction, disruption of wildlife, and potential pollution. The noise, light, and human activity associated with such a facility will disturb the natural balance of the reserve. Furthermore, the transportation and storage of compressed CO2 on site pose risks of leakage or accidental release, which could have catastrophic consequences for the local environment. I urge Cory and the relevant authorities to consider alternative sites for the decarbonisation plant that do not compromise protected natural areas. There may be brownfield sites or other industrial areas more suitable for such a project, where the environmental impact would be significantly lessened. It is crucial to explore all possible alternatives before encroaching on a nature reserve that was established for the express purpose of conservation. Allowing this development sets a dangerous precedent for future projects that may similarly encroach upon protected areas. It undermines the integrity of conservation efforts and sends a message that industrial development can take precedence over environmental preservation. We must prioritize the protection of our natural spaces for current and future generations, maintaining their role as refuges for wildlife and as sources of inspiration and well-being for people. The Crossness Nature Reserve is not just a piece of land; it is a cherished communal asset that many residents and visitors deeply value. The consultation process must genuinely consider the voices of those who advocate for nature preservation. Thank you for considering my objections. Sincerely, Aleksei Sysoev