M1 Junction 10a Grade Separation - Luton

Section 51 advice

The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.

There is a statutory duty, under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008, around an application or potential application. This includes recording the name of the person who requested advice and the advice given. This information has to be made publicly available.

Search advice

Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.

Showing 1 to 14 of 14 documents, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • View advice to Luton Borough Council

    Letter from Keith Dove (Luton Borough Council) attached

  • View advice to Mr Aldridge Luton Borough Council

    Telephone conversation on 11 October 2012 regarding the continuous need for the application documents to be made available at the local deposit document venues for the proposed M1 Junction 10a Grade... Read more

  • View advice to Bircham Dyson Bell

    Prior to submission of Luton's M1 J10a application, we received the attached letter from PINS dated 7 June and providing comments on drafts of the development consent order and explanatory... Read more

  • View advice to Tom Henderson

    We wish to raise a couple of points in relation to representations received by PINS on the M1 J10a scheme. Firstly, we note that regulation 3(5) of the Infrastructure Planning (Examination... Read more

  • View advice to Luton Borough Council

    Requesting advice regarding the correct procedures that LBC should be following for this stage of the the process where the Planning Inspectorate is requesting an ?adequacy of consultation... Read more

  • View advice to Bircham Dyson Bell

    Bircham Dyson Bell LLP, on behalf of their clients, enquired as to arrangements for applications for s.131 certificates. The response was by email.

  • View advice to Michael Kilroy

    The promoter for the proposal, currently at the pre-application stage, requested information about fees charged by the IPC. The IPC's response was by email.

  • View advice to Antony Aldridge

    IPC's comments on the technical aspects of the draft Development Consent Order and Explanatory Memorandum, sent from the promoter to the IPC on 16 December 2011.

  • View advice to Antony Aldridge

    Email enquiry from the promoter, seeking advice on consultation and whether their approach is reasonable if the scheme layout is amended.

  • View advice to Central Bedfordshire Council

    Colin Wilkinson from Central Bedfordshire Council called seeking information on the proposed M1 Junction 10a Grade Separation project in Luton.

  • View advice to URS Scott Wilson

    Further email response from the IPC to the promoter, following a project meeting held on 12 October 2011 between the IPC , Luton Borough Council and URS Scott Wilson, in regard to expected submission... Read more

  • View advice to URS Scott Wilson

    Email response from the IPC to URS Scott Wilson in regard to issues raised from the introductory project meeting held on 12 October 2011, and a further email from URS Scott Wilson dated 21 October... Read more

  • View meeting with Luton Borough Council

    Introduction to scheme and discussion of pre-application and examination processes.

  • View meeting with Michael Kilroy

    Introduction to the IPC and its procedures