Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

East Midlands Gateway Rail Freight Interchange

Section 51 advice

The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.

There is a statutory duty, under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008, around an application or potential application. This includes recording the name of the person who requested advice and the advice given. This information has to be made publicly available.

Search advice

Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.

Showing 1 to 25 of 41 documents, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • View meeting with Eversheds LLP

    A meeting was held between Eversheds LLP and The Planning Inspectorate to provide feedback on the examination experience.

    Meeting with: Eversheds LLP
    Date of meeting: 3 March 2016

  • View advice to Nabarro LLP for Lafarge Tarmac

    Email received informing the Planning Inspectorate of change of name.

    Enquiry from: Nabarro LLP for Lafarge Tarmac
    Date advice given: 27 August 2015

  • View advice to Equality and Human Rights Commission

    Thank you for your email regarding the examination and timetable procedure for the application by Roxhill (Kegworth) Ltd for an Order Granting Development Consent for the East Midlands Gateway Rail Fr... Read more

    Enquiry from: Equality and Human Rights Commission
    Date advice given: 27 January 2015

  • View advice to Toni Harrington

    Request from an interested party to extend an examination deadline and enquiry about hard copy deposit locations.

    Enquiry from: Toni Harrington
    Date advice given: 20 January 2015

  • View advice to Merelyn Lobb

    Advised given on the status of an interested party.

    Enquiry from: Merelyn Lobb
    Date advice given: 19 January 2015

  • View advice to Andy Yeomans

    The Planning Inspectorate gave advice to interested party regarding examination events.

    Enquiry from: Andy Yeomans
    Date advice given: 13 January 2015

  • View advice to Steve Haberfield

    The Planning Inspectorate gave advice to interested party regarding examination events.

    Enquiry from: Steve Haberfield
    Date advice given: 13 January 2015

  • View advice to Gillian Wilmot

    Request to become an interested party

    Enquiry from: Gillian Wilmot
    Date advice given: 18 December 2014

  • View advice to Andrew Bridgen

    Andrew Bridgen MP made submissions after the elapse of the statutory relevant representations period on 3 November 2014. A letter dated 13 November 2014 and received by the Inspectorate on 20 November... Read more

    Enquiry from: Andrew Bridgen
    Date advice given: 20 November 2014

  • View advice to Marrons Shakespeares

    Marrons Shakespeares provided its response to post-Acceptance advice issued by the Inspectorate on 19 September 2014. It also drew attention to a number of potential changes to the application documen... Read more

    Enquiry from: Marrons Shakespeares
    Date advice given: 20 November 2014

  • View advice to Julie McCarthy

    Advice given on late relevant representation not made on prescribed form.

    Enquiry from: Julie McCarthy
    Date advice given: 11 November 2014

  • View advice to Steve Buffery

    The Planning Inspectorate provided advice to local planning authority on submission made at relevant representation stage.

    Enquiry from: Steve Buffery
    Date advice given: 11 November 2014

  • View advice to Andrew Bridgen

    The Planning Inspectorate received request to become an interested party after close of relevant representation stage.

    Enquiry from: Andrew Bridgen
    Date advice given: 10 November 2014

  • View advice to Michael Davies

    The Planning Inspectorate received comments on the application during relevant representation stage not made on prescribed form.

    Enquiry from: Michael Davies
    Date advice given: 3 November 2014

  • View advice to Emma Clowes

    As an interested party, I have completed the online form however wonder how and when I will be prompted to provide further information in relation my representation.

    Enquiry from: Emma Clowes
    Date advice given: 15 October 2014

  • View advice to Paul Husbands

    The Planning Inspectorate provided advice about the process of making a relevant representation in response to comments received during relevant representation period.

    Enquiry from: Paul Husbands
    Date advice given: 7 October 2014

  • View advice to Janice Evans

    I am writing to lodge my complaint that the consultation for the proposed SRFI development by Roxhill was woefully inadequate and I request that the process be repeated with full and proper due proces... Read more

    Enquiry from: Janice Evans
    Date advice given: 26 September 2014

  • View advice to John Hallam

    I would like you to reconsider the proposal for the EAST MIDLANDS GATEWAY SCHEME. It truly will be a disaster for the surrounding villages to build such a big site on a green belt site. We have q... Read more

    Enquiry from: John Hallam
    Date advice given: 26 September 2014

  • View advice to Nick Burton

    I write to you to formally object to the proposed East Midlands Gateway, planning application made 28th of August 2014. I am objecting based on 6 counts. These objections are based on my own detailed ... Read more

    Enquiry from: Nick Burton
    Date advice given: 26 September 2014

  • View advice to Paul and Lorraine Missin

    I feel I must write to lodge my disapproval to the proposed industrial developmentaround Kegworth & Castle Donington. It amazes me that we talk about saving the environment, reduce health risks and re... Read more

    Enquiry from: Paul and Lorraine Missin
    Date advice given: 26 September 2014

  • View advice to Peter Hill

    The following was forwarded from North West Leicestershire District Council and the Planning Inspectorate offered the following advice in response: I have carefully studied the proposals presented ... Read more

    Enquiry from: Peter Hill
    Date advice given: 26 September 2014

  • View advice to Richard Burns

    Although probably too late to address the above,I would like to mention a few points. 1- We have had ONE display to explain what this development is about and how it will affect us. No further info... Read more

    Enquiry from: Richard Burns
    Date advice given: 26 September 2014

  • View advice to Simon Gibson

    The proposed SRFI Warehouse Park at Lockington, since it's first incepetion, has been promoted to all concerned under a number of false pretences by the developer and by developers lobbyist, local Co... Read more

    Enquiry from: Simon Gibson
    Date advice given: 26 September 2014

  • View advice to Susan and Philip Salaun

    The amount of consultation that has taken place for such a major development has been minimal and has left so many questions unanswered. This area of NW Leics has taken the brunt of so many developmen... Read more

    Enquiry from: Susan and Philip Salaun
    Date advice given: 26 September 2014

  • View advice to Trevor Beale

    I am writing to lodge my complaint that the consultation for the proposed SRFI development by Roxhill was woefully inadequate and I request that the process be repeated with full and proper due proces... Read more

    Enquiry from: Trevor Beale
    Date advice given: 26 September 2014