East Midlands Gateway Rail Freight Interchange

Section 51 advice

The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.

There is a statutory duty, under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008, around an application or potential application. This includes recording the name of the person who requested advice and the advice given. This information has to be made publicly available.

Search advice

Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.

Showing 1 to 41 of 41 documents, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | View 50 results per page | 100

  • View meeting with Eversheds LLP

    A meeting was held between Eversheds LLP and The Planning Inspectorate to provide feedback on the examination experience.

  • View advice to Nabarro LLP for Lafarge Tarmac

    Email received informing the Planning Inspectorate of change of name.

  • View advice to Equality and Human Rights Commission

    Thank you for your email regarding the examination and timetable procedure for the application by Roxhill (Kegworth) Ltd for an Order Granting Development Consent for the East Midlands Gateway Rail... Read more

  • View advice to Toni Harrington

    Request from an interested party to extend an examination deadline and enquiry about hard copy deposit locations.

  • View advice to Merelyn Lobb

    Advised given on the status of an interested party.

  • View advice to Andy Yeomans

    The Planning Inspectorate gave advice to interested party regarding examination events.

  • View advice to Steve Haberfield

    The Planning Inspectorate gave advice to interested party regarding examination events.

  • View advice to Gillian Wilmot

    Request to become an interested party

  • View advice to Andrew Bridgen

    Andrew Bridgen MP made submissions after the elapse of the statutory relevant representations period on 3 November 2014. A letter dated 13 November 2014 and received by the Inspectorate on 20 November... Read more

  • View advice to Marrons Shakespeares

    Marrons Shakespeares provided its response to post-Acceptance advice issued by the Inspectorate on 19 September 2014. It also drew attention to a number of potential changes to the application... Read more

  • View advice to Julie McCarthy

    Advice given on late relevant representation not made on prescribed form.

  • View advice to Steve Buffery

    The Planning Inspectorate provided advice to local planning authority on submission made at relevant representation stage.

  • View advice to Andrew Bridgen

    The Planning Inspectorate received request to become an interested party after close of relevant representation stage.

  • View advice to Michael Davies

    The Planning Inspectorate received comments on the application during relevant representation stage not made on prescribed form.

  • View advice to Emma Clowes

    As an interested party, I have completed the online form however wonder how and when I will be prompted to provide further information in relation my representation.

  • View advice to Paul Husbands

    The Planning Inspectorate provided advice about the process of making a relevant representation in response to comments received during relevant representation period.

  • View advice to Janice Evans

    I am writing to lodge my complaint that the consultation for the proposed SRFI development by Roxhill was woefully inadequate and I request that the process be repeated with full and proper due... Read more

  • View advice to John Hallam

    I would like you to reconsider the proposal for the EAST MIDLANDS GATEWAY SCHEME. It truly will be a disaster for the surrounding villages to build such a big site on a green belt site. We have... Read more

  • View advice to Nick Burton

    I write to you to formally object to the proposed East Midlands Gateway, planning application made 28th of August 2014. I am objecting based on 6 counts. These objections are based on my own detailed... Read more

  • View advice to Paul and Lorraine Missin

    I feel I must write to lodge my disapproval to the proposed industrial developmentaround Kegworth & Castle Donington. It amazes me that we talk about saving the environment, reduce health risks and... Read more

  • View advice to Peter Hill

    The following was forwarded from North West Leicestershire District Council and the Planning Inspectorate offered the following advice in response: I have carefully studied the proposals presented... Read more

  • View advice to Richard Burns

    Although probably too late to address the above,I would like to mention a few points. 1- We have had ONE display to explain what this development is about and how it will affect us. No further... Read more

  • View advice to Simon Gibson

    The proposed SRFI Warehouse Park at Lockington, since it's first incepetion, has been promoted to all concerned under a number of false pretences by the developer and by developers lobbyist, local... Read more

  • View advice to Susan and Philip Salaun

    The amount of consultation that has taken place for such a major development has been minimal and has left so many questions unanswered. This area of NW Leics has taken the brunt of so many... Read more

  • View advice to Trevor Beale

    I am writing to lodge my complaint that the consultation for the proposed SRFI development by Roxhill was woefully inadequate and I request that the process be repeated with full and proper due... Read more

  • View advice to Marrons Shakespeares

    Marrons Shakespeares queried whether the requirements under Reg 13(2)(b)(i) and (ii) of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 could be satisfied by way of... Read more

  • View advice to Morag Thomson

    Following issue of Acceptance decision, the Planning Inspectorate issued section 51 advice to the applicant with regard to observations the Inspectorate made on the submitted application.

  • View advice to M.B Thomas

    I note that your website shows proposals for two Rail Freight Interchanges in The East Midlands which are just 15 miles apart. Please could you clarify whether or not the need for two such... Read more

  • View advice to Gerrard Moss

    Advice was requested in response to the following queries: i) Clarification was sought on the area of the proposed scheme, including boundries and proximity to Lockington. ii) Clarificaiton was... Read more

  • View advice to Greg Hall

    I have been contacted by the j24 action group trying to stop this development. Like them, I had no prior knowledge of any consultation and was not aware of any public meeting until it was too late... Read more

  • View meeting with Marrons Shakespeares (for applicant)

    Pre-submission meeting for applicant to provide project update and Planning Inspectorate to provide feedback on draft documents. See attachment for note of the meeting.

  • View advice to Emma Clowes

    The first round of consultations were held in Lockington, Castle Donington and Kegworth back in February 2014, however due to poor advertising, these exhibitions were deemed "inadequate", and... Read more

  • View advice to Mike Thomas

    I am a resident of Lockington and I understand that there is to be a further public exhibition/consultation this month regarding this development. To date I have not received any notification of when... Read more

  • View advice to Nick Burton

    I wish to complain about the completely inadequate publication of dates and venues for public consultation on the Roxhill East Midlands Gateway Project. First of all I missed the first round of... Read more

  • View advice to Steve Haberfield

    As a resident of Castle Donington, I write to you regarding The East Midlands Gateway, after reading the developers online documents. However in these documents I see no mention of the Loading Gauge... Read more

  • View advice to Steve Kirk

    I live in Castle Donington and I am very concerned about the proposed development of the SRFI at Junction 24 of the M1. This is the biggest threat to my village & the other local communities that we... Read more

  • View meeting with Affected local authorities Andrew Yeomanson

    Below is a record of advice issued by the Planning Inspectorate in response to questions outstanding from its meeting with local authorities on 30 April 2014.

  • View meeting with Affected local authorities David Hughes

    See attached meeting note and presentation.

  • View advice to Emma Clowes

    As per your website, http://infrastructure.planningportal.gov.uk/projects/east-midlands/east-midlands-gateway-rail-freight-interchange/?ipcsection=advice&ipcadvice=3b390885c4 the developer for the... Read more

  • View advice to Toni Harrington

    Mrs Harrington rang the Planning Inspectorate with concerns that the methods used by the developer to advertise the consultation for the proposed application are not reaching the local community and... Read more

  • View meeting with Roxhill Developments Limited

    To Introduce a new project to the IPC and gain knowledge of the 2008 planning act.