Register of advice
This list is a record of general advice provided by the Planning Inspectorate. We publish this to comply with the 2008 Planning Act.
Project specific advice can be viewed on the relevant project page.
Search advice
Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.
Showing 26 to 50 of 727 entries, newest first.
Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page
-
View meeting with Renewable Energy Solutions
Project Update Meeting
-
View advice to Anthony Thompson
Dear Caroline, I am confused about the approach you are taking here. You have responded to other S51 requests for advice in this matter and published attachments. Could you therefore be more specific ... Read more
-
View advice to Anonymous
A possible solar NSIP.
-
View meeting with Teeside Flexible Regas Port Limited
Project update meeting.
-
View advice to Mr Grubb
I write in relation to an instruction we have received on a proposed solar farm application in England which we believe should be consented through the Town and Country Planning Act (1990), but I thou... Read more
-
View advice to Pegasus Group
Request confirmation that a proposed solar farm should not be determined as a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project
-
View advice to Flotation Energy and EnBW/bp
Lastly, since out meeting, the Project has been reviewing our approach to the Information to Support Appropriate Assessment (ISAA) and I would like to seek the Inspectorate’s view. The ISAA will form ... Read more
-
View advice to Jonathan Dean
During the examination of an NSIP does an Interested Party have a statutory right to present during the examination, and if so, which regulation permits this?”
-
View advice to The Mineral Planning Group Ltd
Request confirmation that a proposed development should not be determined as a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project.
-
View advice to David Rogers
Please see attached.
-
View meeting with National Highways
Project update and draft documents feedback review.
-
View advice to Russ Tucker
Please see attached.
-
View advice to Stop Botley West
Please see attached.
-
View advice to Aldham Parish council
Has another request for info been issued by the PI recently on the Norwich to Tilbury Pylons please. Another village has sent me a copy of a reponse they have sent to Briston but Aldham Parish Council... Read more
-
View advice to West Bergholt Parish Council
Please see attached
-
View advice to Various enquirers
Various representations about the merits of the Proposed Development.
-
View advice to David Rogers
Please see attached.
-
View advice to Nigel Pearce
Please see attached.
-
View advice to John Webley
Please see attached.
-
View advice to Alex Maidment
I strongly object to the plans for Gatwick expansion using a the conversion of the emergency runway approach. It will have a serious adverse effect on the environment and the well being of humans and ... Read more
-
View advice to James Freeman
I would be grateful if you could advise on whether PINS are ok with handling a covering letter to a Joint Authority AoC response which includes the electronic signatures of ten senior officers from ea... Read more
-
View meeting with Gatroben Developments 2 Limited
The Planning Inspectorate (the Inspectorate) attended the initial Steering Group meeting for the Dogger Bank D Wind Farm, held via Teams on 12 July 2023. The meeting focused on the Applicant’s propose... Read more
-
View advice to West Sussex County Council
As you are aware, the ten Gatwick local authorities are working collectively on the Northern Runway Project. With regard to Adequacy of Consultation (AoC), the authorities propose to submit a joint re... Read more
-
View advice to Merton Council
Merton Council queried whether it could be included in correspondence from the Planning Inspectorate regarding the adequacy of the Applicant’s Pre-application consultation.
-
View advice to Communities Against Gatwick Noise and Emissions
The enquirer expressed an intention to register as an Interested Party in respect of the scheme, and requested further details.