Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Advice to Dalton Warner Davis LLP

Back to list

Enquiry

From
Dalton Warner Davis LLP
Date advice given
13 June 2014
Enquiry type
Email

  1. Is if necessary for each application document to have a summary? Advice Note 6 suggests this is the case. However, we have a number of descriptive documents (e.g. site description and proposed development description) where a summary would not be particularly useful to the reader, while we have others that are very short documents (e.g. Consents and Licences required under Other Legislation).

  2. Advice Note 6 refers to documents having a font size of 12. While we have followed this for most documents we have adopted a smaller font for very large documents (10 or 11) such as the Consultation Report and the ES. I previously discussed this with Susannah Guest who confirmed that this would not be an issue provided the documents were still legible. I would be grateful if you could confirm that the use of a 10 or 11 font size is acceptable.

Advice given

I have set out answers to your two queries below:

Q1: Is it necessary for each application document to have a summary?

A: PINS do not require a summary for every application document submitted. Summaries are expected for larger documents however, you should make your own judgement when preparing the application documents, as a summary for smaller documents may not be useful to the reader.

Q2: Could you confirm that the use of a 10 or 11 font size is acceptable.

A: Ideally, the application documents should be drafted using the same size font throughout the suite; font size 12. However, font size 10 or 11 is acceptable, as previously advised by Susannah Guest, for larger documents. Most importantly all the documents must be legible.