Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
East Anglia ONE North Offshore Windfarm

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 351 to 375 of 878 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Sally Clarke

    I am a regular visitor to the Suffolk Heritage coast staying with friends who live near Friston. I do not object to offshore wind farms what I object to is the onshore installations which will cause... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Sarah Dawson

    I support the development of offshore wind energy but am very concerned about the plans for the onshore transmission structure. I would like to see an alternative solution realised that would involve... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Sarah Gammon

    Landscape I have known and loved the Suffolk Coast all my life, particularly enjoying the nature, landscape and the very special character that visitors come to the Suffolk Coast to enjoy. I have huge... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Susan Osben

    I wish to object to the Scottish Power planning application for the following reasons: - the countryside designated for the substation and other infrastructure is unsuitable, being in and close to an... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Amanda Churchill on behalf of Tabitha Churchill (Tabitha Churchill)

    I fervently believe the building of this is a tourist area and surrounded by ANB sites is wrong. There needs to be a ring main out to sea and only 1 or 2 points to bring in electricity along the whole... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Ursula Spencer

    The objective of reducing Carbon Emissions by building windfarms is clearly justified but destroying a unique environment to do so is crazy. The site at Friston is in the wrong place. The transport... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • V Willoughby

    so much concrete and steel will have a very negative impact on a populated area of natural beauty

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Wendy Gilbert

    Carving up places that have been designated Areas of Outstanding Beauty, is setting a dangerous precedent. There's area better places top put the substation. There's is a fragile ecosystem around the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Will Dawes

    Dear Examining Authority I am appalled at the proposals for both East Anglia North One (10077) and EA North Two (10078) for the following reasons: - The Thorpeness cliffs are incredibly fragile, soft... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Alan Collett

    I wish to object to this planning application by Scottish Power Renewables for the following reasons:- • The irreparable damage to the countryside, the coastline, the local environment and to wildlife... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Alan Thomas

    Residing in Friston, I am generally supportive of the move toward renewable energy sources. However, the approach adopted by Scottish Power Renewables (SPR) in pursuit of what are wholly commercial... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Angela Skelcher

    I am greatly concerned about the proposed building of substations and associated infrastructure in my local area of Thorpeness and Friston because this is an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Anglian Energy Planning Alliance (Anglian Energy Planning Alliance)

    The Anglian Energy Planning Alliance objects to SPR’s proposals asset out in their DCO application on the following grounds. The AEPA works in support of many of the interested parties opposed to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Anthony Lockwood

    - Cumulative impact on local communities of up to 7 energy projects - Suffolk's famous peace and tranquillity lost, noise pollution, air pollution How can the road infrastructure, with the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Carole Heath

    Cumulative impact on local communities of up to 7 energy projects Unsuitability of Thorpeness cliffs as site for landing cables Use of unspoilt countryside at Friston for complexes the size of Wembley... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Chris Askew

    My objection to this project are, Traffic on local roads. Air, light & noise pollution. Threat to wildlife and ANOB areas. Concertation of two many projects in one small area. Substations that will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Chris Buckton

    I wish to object to this Scottish Power planning application for the following reasons : It involves the destruction of irreplaceable ancient woodland It severs the coast and heathland AONB disrupting... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Christopher Howes

    I object to this development for the reasons below. 1.It will have an adverse impact on the visual amenity of unspoilt Suffolk countryside. 2.The adverse impact of traffic,noise,pollution,loss of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Christopher Wilson

    I am very much in favour of offshore wind farms, subject to them being located in the least environmentally damaging sites ie away from avian and marine feeding/nesting grounds, but my concerns here... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • David Briggs

    - Cumulative impact on local communities of up to 7 energy projects - Unsuitability of Thorpeness Cliffs as site for landing cables - Use of unspoilt countryside at Friston for substation complexes... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • David Villiers

    this proposal is completely inappropriate for the location as it is too big for the location disrupt an area of outstanding natural beauty destroy the landscape reduce tourist trade effecting one of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • David Whiffen

    I am a regular visitor to the Suffolk Heritage coast staying with my girlfriend's family who live near Friston. I do not object to offshore wind farms what I object to is the onshore installations... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Dr Rachel Herron

    We wish to object to the onshore works aspect of this Planning Application, specifically the proposed landfall at the holiday village of Thorpeness that has extremely fragile cliffs and the 11 km... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Edward Magee

    I fully support the representations being made by SAES and Friston Parish Council. The impact of this planning application will have a detrimental impact to village life, the peace and tranquility of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Friston Parish Council (Friston Parish Council)

    INTRODUCTION The proposed developments (EA1N and EA2) will have a significant adverse impact on Friston and the surrounding area from the onshore elements of the schemes which involve the construction... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020