Filter
Medworth Energy from Waste Combined Heat and Power Facility

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 301 to 325 of 666 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Susan Joy Crown

    The proposed site is far too close to homes, schools and businesses. The increased traffic will overpower our infra structure. The air pollution has yet to be proven to be beneficial to the population... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 October 2022

  • wayne clarke cowling

    How will access be gained to the site? will the use of trains be considered for transport of waste? will there be a new roundabout needed on the A47 What quantity of ash will be produced from the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 October 2022

  • Alan Sacre

    the proposed site for the incinerator is on the main A 47 it will cause even more disruption to the already over crowed A 47 . gridlock at busy times road surface will crack up and we have enough... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 October 2022

  • Barry Toovey

    I will be commenting once I have examined the information.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 October 2022

  • Beatrice White

    Registration comments Incineration is a Thermo-decompositon process where the components present in the waste stream are ionised into the harmless elements at a higher temperature in the presence of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 October 2022

  • Carol Toovey

    I will be commenting once I have examined the information.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 October 2022

  • Christopher John Calver

    I am an []. I live a mile or so downwind of the proposed facility.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 October 2022

  • Colin Brown

    The project should not be authorised, the incinerator would introduce to many lorry’s onto local roads near a school putting pupils at risk, the project would attract rats and produce air pollution at... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 October 2022

  • Diana Mutimer

    In no particular order of importance, and list is incomplete. Further comments will be submitted: Visual impact Air quality deterioration Highways problems and pollution Environmental damage due to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 October 2022

  • John Harrison

    Wisbech is not a suitable site for this facility. The roads already struggle to cope with the existing traffic levels and do not have the capacity for extra vehicles which this facility will require.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 October 2022

  • JONATHAN BETTS

    The location of this incinerator is wholly inappropriate. Its presence will further degrade the living conditions of local residents in what is already a highly deprived area of East Anglia and the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 October 2022

  • Lisa Toovey

    I will be commenting once I have examined the information

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 October 2022

  • Maureen Robertson

    I strongly object to this enormous incinerator will burn 625,000 tonnes of household waste per year and will generate 25 million tonnes of carbon dioxide in its lifetime. The waste would be delivered... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 October 2022

  • Mellody Patricia Bray

    [redacted] . My husband looks after me day and night. We are both retired so live locally most times of the year. Any disruption to my living standards because of degeneration of the quality of air... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 October 2022

  • Stephen Hurst

    Traffic congestion and too close to school etc

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 October 2022

  • Trevor Gilbert

    Shocked and dismayed that you are even looking at this horrendous proposal!

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 October 2022

  • Andrea Louisa French

    Assessment of impact to local health, infrastructure and services as well as location of proposed facility

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 October 2022

  • Astrid Allott

    I am strongly apposed to the proposed incinerator in Wisbech. A facility of this size is totally unsuitable for this area which is an important agricultural area. Also I think there are many key... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 October 2022

  • Lorraine Beakhouse on behalf of Beakhouse (Beakhouse)

    We do not want the infrastructure of our Georgian Market town to be tarnished by the proposed incinerator in our town. We do not want to be subjected to dangerous chemicals in the atmosphere or to be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 October 2022

  • Beata

    I do not agree, the polution slowly will kill us...day by day...I and my family will need to find other place to live.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 October 2022

  • Beverley Hulme

    Too large a facility to be positioned in such a small town. The waste will not be locally sourced and therefore must be transported in. The roads are not suitable for the proposed number of lorries... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 October 2022

  • Brodie Kyle Corbett

    I would like to register that I am against this planning application on several grounds. 1) Air pollution. Not only are we having pollution from the actual incinerator but also from the extra... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 October 2022

  • Bruce Braithwaite

    The case for an EfW facility in Wisbech.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 October 2022

  • Councillor Alexandra Kemp (Borough of King's Lynn and West Norfolk) (Councillor Alexandra Kemp (Borough of King's Lynn and West Norfolk))

    As the County Councillor for Clenchwarton and King's Lynn South, I object to the facility as -: 1. The incinerator is not needed as there is an oversupply of incinerators in the East of England. 2.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 October 2022

  • Daljit Roy

    The road systems are already clogged. When the A47 is closed traffic goes through small surrounding villages, in which there has been a number of fatalities . The incinerator will also cause land... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 October 2022