Filter
Medworth Energy from Waste Combined Heat and Power Facility

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 626 to 650 of 666 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Kate Badham

    We are a small town surrounded by agricultural land . Our roads can not cope with the traffic we currently have and certainly won’t cope with the huge volume of lorries needed to ‘feed’ a mega... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Kevin Brennan-glass

    It would add to the already bad air pollution and be very bad for Wisbech infrastructure of the roads there is always traffic jams as it is without 300 Lorries a day Many crops are grown in and around... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Leziate Parish Council (Leziate Parish Council)

    The Parish Council objects to the building of the Heat and Power Facility in Wisbech for the disposal of 625,000 Tnes/yr for the following reasons: 1. Delivery of 625,600 Tnes/yr. of waste and the... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Lucia Hedderley

    This project not only present significant issues in terms of impact to risk to health to the local population, but also significant environmental issues with its impact on local roads, traffic. Local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Lucy Jefferis

    I object to the project becuse: - The roads are congested enough in the local area being self employed having additionl traffic causing more congestion will add time onto my day and affect my... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Lucy Moody

    My main concerns about this proposal is the proximity to schools and the town. In addition the infrastructure for wisbech is poor with too many HGVs as it is. The incinerator would add to this issue.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • MAHA UK Ltd (MAHA UK Ltd)

    My main issues are as follows, the increased Traffic flow in and out of Wisbech with trucks who will be feeding the furnace once the incinerator is lit, to my knowledge it will burn 24/7, for this it... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Mark Plumb

    As a daily road user, the increase in transport will lead to congestion on the roads in Baddition to an increase in emissions from the vehicles. A facility such as this will lead to serious... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Mark Southwell

    I work near the site where this waste plant is planned , this will finish our business off as the roads will not be able to cope with the traffic , it will destroy our customer base .there is a school... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Martin Adams

    I object to the project!

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Mervyn John White

    I consider that the proposed incinerator would be in totally the wrong place as outfall from the plant, both visible and invisible, will have a detrimental affect on many local homes and nearby... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Michael Clarke

    PROVEN health concerns

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Michelle Knight

    I am registering to you to express my absolute distress at the proposal to build a mega incinerator in my small Georgian town of Wisbech and to log my objection. I was born in Wisbech and am the lead... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • MJ Acoustics (MJ Acoustics)

    Much has already been said and documented but the main areas of concern are health risks from pollutants and a responsibility to our staff for the well-being of them and their families. The congestion... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • National Highways Limited (National Highways Limited)

    National Highways objects to the Project for the following reasons. National Highways is a statutory undertaker and is appointed by the Secretary of State for Transport to operate and maintain the... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Natural England (Natural England)

    Natural England is satisfied that the Environmental Statement and Habitats Regulations Assessment confirm that the proposed scheme is unlikely to have any adverse effect on key matters within Natural... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Linda Parsley on behalf of Neil Parsley (Neil Parsley)

    Health & traffic issues

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Paul simpson

    It will affect my health and work

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Phil Wiskin

    I am very concerned about this proposed development for a number of reasons. 1. Personal health - Due to emissions 2. Environmental - Due to emissions and excessive heavy vehicle traffic movements. 3.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Philip Pilbeam

    This incinerator will have a negative impact on our whole community. Health concerns about particulates, bottom Ash & for me the traffic congestion with the 200 plus lorry movements a day!!!! Our town... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Pro-Clean Industrial UK Ltd (Pro-Clean Industrial UK Ltd)

    This incinerator could have drastic consequences for all our businesses and for the town as a whole. It will bring minimal jobs to the town (less than 50) but the potential for job losses could be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Rapid Recruitment Ltd. (Rapid Recruitment Ltd.)

    We object to the Waste Incinerator proposal because the road system will not cope with the high number of vehicles moving to and from the site every day. The current state of the roads is not good and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Roy Alan Weare

    I am very concerned about the effect on climate change at a time when we should be reducing CO2 emissions. Also very concerned about the impact on the local environment and the ability of the proposed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • BNP Paribas Real Estate (BNP Paribas Real Estate) on behalf of Royal Mail Group Limited (Royal Mail Group Limited)

    Royal Mail Group Limited (RM) supports this proposed Energy from Waste CHP facility, but is seeking to secure mitigations to protect its road based operations during the construction phase. Under... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022

  • Sarah-Fay Berry

    To whom it may concern, I wish to make my objections to the proposed mega incinerator for Wisbech. The effect on air quality: I work with patients who have life limiting illness at The Alan Hudson Day... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 November 2022