Representation by Paulette Jane Northam
- Date submitted
- 30 October 2023
- Submitted by
- Members of the public/businesses
I have already submitted my thoughts on Rampion 2 during the consultation process undertaken by Rampion 2 team in 2021 and had my submission acknowledged on 21 September 2021. I understand that post this consultation there have been various tweaks to the plans but my fundamental objections still remain. In the broadest terms I repeat below my main objections as previously made to the Rampion team to the project. I confirm that I am a local resident. 'Whilst I accept wind farms have a part to play in the UK energy strategy I wholeheartedly OBJECT TO RAMPION2. My objection is predicated on the fact that I do not believe the Sussex Bay is the most suitable location. The following points explain my reasons: A. So many LARGE turbines so CLOSE to the shore - against government guidelines/policies. Such a windfarm should be sited much further out to sea to be truly classed as an offshore farm. As Andrew Griffith MP for Arundel and S. Downs states, there is plenty of capacity available at sites with more reliable wind in the North Sea (Dogger Bank Teesside C&D areas which RWE will be fully conversant with). B. Leading on from A. above. In 2016 the UK Government Offshore Energy Strategic Environmental Assessment recommended that windfarms should be at least 25 miles from a National Park. This proposal is only 10.5 miles from the South Downs National Park Boundary. C. Significant detrimental visual impact on an outstanding seascape. Negative impacts on both the natural seascape environment and on personal well-being (specifically mental health well being). D. Newer wind technologies could be utilised in areas with significantly higher wind power - for RWE to seek to 'extend' (and I use that word loosely) in a relatively low wind zone in comparison to what is available elsewhere is strange to say the least. It is my understanding that some of the newest windfarms elsewhere typically produce 60% more capacity than the planned Rampion2. Such a fact certainly calls into the question why Rampion2 is being pursued with such vigour and our politicians should be holding RWE to account.'