Filter
Drax Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 226 to 250 of 283 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • GDPR Protected 001

    I object to this project as I stand against the burning of trees that Drax is proposing to do, I also object to the fact that they are labeling it as an eco freindly solution

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 September 2022

  • Guy Johnson

    Dear Sir / Madam, I wish to object to Drax’s application to add carbon capture technology to two of its wood-burning units. I am objecting because I believe the proposal is not a sustainable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 September 2022

  • Jamie Russell

    Dear Sir / Madam, I wish to object to Drax’s application to add carbon capture technology to two of its wood-burning units. I am objecting because I believe the proposal is not a sustainable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 September 2022

  • Kirsten de Vos

    I’m very concerned that we currently give subsidies to firms like Drax. Burning wood is NOT sustainable. Trees take decades to capture and sequester CO2 and when burned release it into the atmosphere... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 September 2022

  • National Grid (National Grid)

    Relevant Representation of National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc in respect of the DRAX Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage DCO (the “Project”) This relevant representation is submitted on... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 1 September 2022

  • Aidan Francis

    The scientific community do not believe this unproven technology will work. This is purely a greenwashing exercise by the worst polluter in the UK. Furthermore they want to secure billions from the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022

  • Associated British Ports (Associated British Ports)

    Please see email attachment from 2 September 2022.

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Jessica Upton

    We are in a climate crisis NOW. We can see the effects of it already across the world. England has got off lightly so far but it won’t escape unless we lead in carbon emission reduction & this... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022

  • Kathryn Pybus

    Negative health impacts on workers and wider community. Local environmental impacts on important wildlife sites. Large amount of public money already spent on Europes largest Carbon emitter that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022

  • Martin Roberts

    This is a complete con and waste if money, better off putting the funds to build into renewable energy sources

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022

  • Martin Stern

    I am complaing about the drax progect

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022

  • Pat Temple-Murray

    Dear Sir / Madam, I wish to object to Drax’s application to add carbon capture technology to two of its wood-burning units. I am objecting because I believe the proposal is not a sustainable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022

  • Southern Environmental Law Center (Southern Environmental Law Center)

    Please see representation attached.

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Ben Long

    Dear Sir / Madam, I wish to object to Drax’s application to add carbon capture technology to two of its wood-burning units. I am objecting because I believe the proposal is not a sustainable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Harry Partridge

    Dear Sir / Madam, I wish to object to Drax’s application to add carbon capture technology to two of its wood-burning units. I am objecting because I believe the proposal is not a sustainable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Hull Friends of the Earth (Hull Friends of the Earth)

    I am writing on behalf of Hull Friends of the Earth (HFOE) in objection to the current application by Drax to fit carbon capture to two wood-burning units. The following summarises our reasons for... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Kirsten Ellis

    Dear Sir / Madam, I wish to object to Drax’s application to add carbon capture technology to two of its wood-burning units. I am objecting because I believe the proposal is not a sustainable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Adam Myers

    Dear Sir / Madam, I am writing to register my objection to Drax’s application to add BECCS carbon capture technology to two of its wood-burning towers. My objection is based in my belief that the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 September 2022

  • Deborah Clare Cobbett

    Many aspects of the proposal concern me, not least the highly questionable claim that burning trees is a sustainable way to produce energy when this is causing deforestation around the world,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 September 2022

  • Julie Williamson

    burning trees for energy, in the short term, emits more carbon dioxide than coal or gas. It is adding to the climate emergency, which many politicians are choosing to ignore, as they continue to put... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 September 2022

  • Sophie Curtis

    Dear Sir / Madam, I wish to object to Drax’s application to add carbon capture technology to two of its wood-burning units. I am objecting because I believe the proposal is not a sustainable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 September 2022

  • Amari Young

    Dear Sir / Madam, I wish to object to Drax’s application to add carbon capture technology to two of its wood-burning units. I am objecting because I believe the proposal is not a sustainable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 September 2022

  • Andrew Morrice

    I am concerned that this project relies on faulty CCS technology and will worsen the climate crisis, with devastating effects for all of us.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 September 2022

  • Biofuelwatch (Biofuelwatch)

    I am writing on behalf of the environmental organisation, Biofuelwatch, to respond to the application by Drax to fit carbon capture equipment to two of the power station’s wood-burning units.... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 5 September 2022

  • Campaign Against Climate Change Trade Union Group (Campaign Against Climate Change Trade Union Group)

    Firstly, we would argue that BECCS technology should be considered as a separate technology in its own right, rather than merely as an addition to an already consented biomass burning installation.... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 5 September 2022