Back to list Mallard Pass Solar Project

Representation by The Andreae Family (The Andreae Family)

Date submitted
9 January 2023
Submitted by
Members of the public/businesses

The scale of the Mallard Pass Solar Project proposal is colossal, to the extent that it will lead to irreversible damage to the local community (8 villages immediately nearby, plus another 10 within 3 miles.) In addition there is the loss of quality, productive agricultural land, the loss of the natural character of the countryside, lasting damage on biodiversity and the environment, plus damage to historical assets and identity. All of these concerns have been detailed by the Mallard Pass Action Group and we wholeheartedly support all of their objections. We accept that green energy initiatives such as solar are essential but it is the sheer scale of this one that is so alarming. It seems out of proportion to the location. No company will be considering such a development without profit in mind and perhaps this is why the planned development is so huge, particularly in light of the conveniently located and easily accessed substation near Ryhall village, which has spare capacity. Our fear is that plans and decisions are being made based primarily on the presence of this facility and the positive impact on profit that this will bring. Impact on the locality, particularly environmental are being overlooked. We are also aware that other solar developments are planned for development in Lincolnshire but this is not mentioned anywhere in the MPSF information. If they were being open and transparent with us, surely the bigger picture of how their development plans sit in relation to others in the area is critical information to the consultation and decision-making process. There has been little mentioned of the manufacturing and supply process for the huge expanse of solar panels proposed. Where will they be made and under what circumstances or conditions? Where do the raw materials come from and how have they been obtained, especially the precious metals involved. Assurance and proof must be provided that the sourcing and supply of all aspects of the materials required has not involved child or any slave labour; that all human rights have been respected throughout; and that there has been no environmental exploitation. At the other end of the energy capture process is the critical consideration of what happens to the solar panels at the end of their life-cycle. All manufacturers and developers must be taking positive decisions and actions for the environment with regard to how long their products last and recycling of all components. We have seen no mention or assurance from MPSF on any of this.