Representation by Diana holden
- Date submitted
- 20 February 2023
- Submitted by
- Members of the public/businesses
I object to the proposal for the Mallard Pass solar farm to be sited around Essendine for the following reasons: Loss of BMV farmland at time of growing concern about Food security. There needs to be an overall plan for siting solar panels that does not prioritise Energy security over Food security. Loss of habitat, visual impact, and loss of possible archaeological sites. The mitigation suggested shows the potential impact will not ensure the adverse effects of construction, use and future decommissioning will be able to achieve the 10% biodiversity net gain suggested. The sheer size of the site, the impact of 3.3 metre high solar panels, fencing, substation, and security lighting on the local community and wildlife cannot be underestimated. New permissive paths, picnic benches, and escape openings for animals will not compensate for the loss of habitat and enjoyment of the present area. There are serious concerns about the experience of the company making the proposal to deliver such a vast project and human rights concerns about the use of Uyghur forced labour in [Redacted] supply chain. There is an increased flood risk in downstream areas from run off which has not been properly examined. Although there is a need to reduce the use of fossil fuels and produce cleaner energy, the overall negative impact of this proposal taken over its lifetime does not balance out any projected benefit from the solar energy produced.