Representation by Zak Martin
- Date submitted
- 9 June 2023
- Submitted by
- Members of the public/businesses
Everything is great apart from one thing, Option 1 would be more expensive as 4YL is having more towers to replace the existing section of the line that is being reused for the new route RB. Option 2 showed no modification to 4YL in that section and had RB running parallel to it which was more cost efficient and less labour requirements as well as circuit outages. - Zak