The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.
-
Request for more detail about Compulsory Aquisition hearings on 8 and 9 October, whether the Council needs to attend, and if it wished to make an objection how it should do so.
-
At the first Development Consent Order hearing, held on Tuesday 24 July at the North Euston Hotel, the Panel advised that the Planning Inspectorate would issue advice under section 51 of the 2008...
Read more
-
For Halite Energy, Mr Humphreys asked about powers under s120 of the Planning Act 2008 to apply legislation in a Development Consent Order
-
Ms McMillian called to explain that she had not registered as an interested party, but would like to participate in the examination.
-
Mr Renwick called to confirm the process for making requests to attend and speak at an open-floor hearing and how a petition of 600 persons in respect of the proposed Preesall Underground Gas Storage...
Read more
-
If the Secretary of State gives a direction deeming that hazardous substances consent (HSC) may be granted, who then formally issues the HSC and who acts as the hazardous substances authority (HSA)...
Read more
-
The role of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) in relation to applications for deemed hazardous substances consent and the relevant provisions of the Planning Act 2008.
-
Halite requested further details of their duty to carry out notifications of hearings during examination.
-
The IPC undertook outreach meetings with members of the public and others, and attended a meeting of the Community Liaison Panel.
-
Ms Purl asked whether or not Fleetwood Town Council were required to register as an intrested party in order to particpate in the examination into the Preesall Underground Gas Storage application.
-
Following the decision to accept the Preesall Gas Storage application for examination the IPC wrote to each of the local Members of Parliament, to let them know of the decision and how they and/or...
Read more
-
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council asked about how statutory local authority consultees are identified.
-
Burnley Borough Council asked about how statuory local authority consultees are indentified.
-
I have considered with Leading Counsel your comments in respect of the parties listed in Part 2 of the Book of Reference (category 3 persons with a right to claim) and whether they should also appear...
Read more
-
Has the IPC issued any advice or guidance on the matter of compulsory purchase compensation that those with an interest in land could read to better understand the situation and their rights?
-
Request for IPC advice regarding the draft book of reference for the proposed Preesall project.
-
Berwin Leighton Paisner (on behalf of Halite) requested comments from the IPC on their draft Habitats Regulations Assessment Report and Statement
-
Developer requested comments on their draft Consultation Report.
-
What matters are relevant to the acceptance decision?
-
With reference to the IPC?s Advice Note 6: Preparation and submission of application documents.
We are currently preparing the Environmental Statement for a NSIP and endeavouring to comply with the...
Read more
-
I am writing with a query in relation to the need for a separate ?rights plan? or whether this information can be included on the works plan.
As you know, under Regulation 5(2)(k) of the...
Read more
-
Could I please check a point with you on application documents.
Regulation 6 of the infrastructure planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 relates to "matters...
Read more
-
Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) (on behalf of Halite) requested the IPC's comments on their draft Development Consent Order (DCO) and Explanatory Memorandum (EM)
-
IPC meeting with representatives of Halite, Berwin Leighton Paisner and Mott MacDonald to discuss the developer's draft Development Consent Order (DCO) and Explanatory Memorandum (EM)
-
See letter attached
-
Query regarding the IPC's powers in respect of granting rights of access to private land to conduct surveys (s.53 of the Planning Act 2008), with reference to the proposed Preesall project
-
Query regarding the proposed Preesall project and the process under section 52 (obtaining information about interests in land) and section 53 (Rights of entry) of the Planning Act 2008.
-
Advice sought on how the IPC's determination of Halite's s.53 authorisation requests will be made available.
-
Sought advice on how the IPC has regard to human rights when determining s.53 authorisation requests.
-
Advice sought on the s.53 authorisation process following Halite's request for authorisation to enter land under s.53 of the Planning Act 2008 (the Act), including access conditions and compliance...
Read more
-
Advice sought on the s.53 authorisation process following Halite's requests for authorisation under s.53 of the Planning Act 2008 (the Act).
-
Advice sought on the s.53 procedure following Halite requests for authorisation for entry to land under s.53 of the Planning Act 2008 (the Act) , compulsory acquisition authorisation under the Act and...
Read more
-
Mr Parkinson requested the IPC's views on alleged actions by the developer in relation to requests for land access and possible compulsory acquisition.
-
In the absence of a bespoke form to apply for deemed hazardous substances consent through the Planning Act 2008, does the IPC have a view on whether it is appropriate to use the standard form of the...
Read more
-
Request for clarification on how to make a deemed hazardous substances consent application through the Planning Act 2008 process.
-
Update meeting held with Halite on 7 June 2011
-
Planning Policy Guidance suggests that it is beneficial to run planning and environmental permitting applications concurrently. Does the IPC have a view in relation to permits outside of a development...
Read more
-
Hambleton Parish Council copied the IPC in on their comments to Halite on their proposed underground gas storage application.
-
The IPC case team spoke with Mr Mulroy of Protect Wyre Group to discuss
1) How correspondence relating to the consultation being undertaken by Halite Energy on the Preesall Gas Storage proposal...
Read more
-
Halite Energy Group submitted annexes marked 'Confidential' to the IPC with their section 46 notification documents.
-
Providing clarification on the requirements under s.53(2) that must be satisifed for the Commission to authorise a s.53 request for a proposed application for an order granting development consent....
Read more
-
Clarification of land to be included within a s.53 authorisation request.
-
(IPC summary) If one was to decline an invitation to take part in the applicant's proposed community liaison panel, would that lead to a disadvantage in making representations at the pre-application...
Read more
-
Letter from Protect Wyre Group regarding involvement in Halite's Community Liaison Panel.
-
Will there be a public inquiry into Halite Energy Group's proposed underground gas storage facility at Preesall Saltfield?
-
With regard to the Underground Gas Storage project in Preesall, what powers can the IPC give to an applicant in regard to access to land for the purpose of conducting surveys. For example, if the...
Read more
-
Can the Infrastructure Planning Commission (the Commission) give Halite Energy Group permission to survey land when landowners refuse entry? (Ref: EN030001 Preesall Saltfield Underground Gas Storage)
-
Mr Mulroy of Protect Wyre Group (PWG) sent four letters regard the Preesall Saltfield underground gas storage project, raising issues about the following:
The timetable of constultations for the...
Read more
-
Please could you advice when the date will be for interested parties to register to comment on the above application
-
Wyre Borough Council (WBC) have received a Freedom of Information (FOI) request from the developers for the Preesall Saltfield Underground Gas Storage scheme requesting land ownership details along...
Read more