Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Why aren’t there more shut off valves in the 55km pipeline. Surely the more valves there are lessens the amount of Co2 that may potentially escape if there is a breach. Has Co2 been categorised yet as...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the health and safety of this project, especially that it is so close to people.
-
I object to this project,as it will industrialise a rural,agricultural, tourist area,and will have negative impacts on the rich wildlife and environment.
-
It will cause chaos is the village. Leading to road closures. As a young family, we are busy and need to access school,clubs and health care easily. The pollution will hinder our health. 2 of us have...
Read more
-
The fear of this exploding or leaking is having a detrimental effect on my life and I and my family strongly oppose to the 25 metre vent stack and pipeline being being built in my village. The stack...
Read more
-
This dangerous unproven proposition is being railroaded onto the people of the East Coast of Lincolnshire. The safety case has not been met. The proposed venting of CO2 via a 25 metre vent stack close...
Read more
-
I have already responded via feedback during the consultation period, but in summary I am concerned about the proposal as I am not convinced from the information provided that carbon capture is safe...
Read more
-
Don't want it here. It has been already been proved not to work, in other countries around the world. Its a dangerous thing to be going under the field next to my house. Not only is it dangerous it...
Read more
-
I am completely against the proposal. I live within the area and do not want the risks associated with the project
-
completely reject this as well as the nuclear storage on our nature reserve at the Terminal . we were promised this land would go back to green when conico finished onsite.
-
1) I attended 2 seminars at both I was told that the co2 produced was going to be the by product of Blue hydrogen. This is not the case. 2 Original plans did not show the ( pumping stations on route....
Read more
-
You are proposing to put your pipeline down the side of my house, and a stack at the back of my house that will give off toxic CO2 every now and then, I do not think this is a very good idea when you...
Read more
-
I do not believe that this proposal is safe. The unproven technology being used will have minimal effects on CO2 levels being taken out of the atmosphere but maximum opportunity to kill people if it...
Read more
-
We are sick and tired of all of this. Give the land back to agriculture as promised. Not to mention the fact that the impact everything has on the very near by nature reserves where there are rare...
Read more
-
I don’t want it. Local people don’t want it.
-
i object to it as i live in a house on the proposed project
-
This plan will obliterate the only safe footpath into Mablethorpe from Theddlethorpe. This is nearer domestic residence than the first 2 plans that were bad enough. This plan would destroy a very...
Read more
-
We are not in favour of this project. We have asked for more information that lay people can understand but have been ignored.
-
I do not consent to having the only safe foot path to Mablethorpe altered or fenced in, I am also totally against the pipeline in any and all ways
-
I have great concerns about carbon capture coming to Theddlethorpe. The main concern is the depth of the pipe, if this is fractured it will be life-threatening. I live a short distance from the...
Read more
-
Louth navigation Trust are keen to ensure the pipeline passes underneath the canal and the river Lud using some form of directional drilling so as not to block the canal for water users. LNT are in...
Read more
-
This proposal facilitates the Capture and Storage of Carbon Dioxide, in an attempt to curb rising atmospheric levels of greenhouse gases which are the cause of global heating / anthropogenic climate...
Read more
-
I am against this project
-
Impact to residents Depth of pipeline Safety issues if pipe ruptures
-
Technical and environmental impacts
-
BPA maintains the Prax owned high pressure fuel pipeline that is crossed by this project. Consequently, all activities in close proximity to the pipeline must be reviewed and accepted by us to ensure...
Read more
-
We have just moved here. A long-awaited move to a place where coast and countryside collide. We chose this area because of the beautiful countryside, the close proximity to the sea, the wildlife and...
Read more
-
As a community we are very concerned about the potential impact of such a massive project. Information received to date has not filled us with confidence. The construction work will have a detrimental...
Read more
-
My client has yet to agree terms for the Option Agreement for Lease, we reserve the ability to make personal reps or changes to these document in the future. My client has yet to agree terms for a...
Read more
-
My client has yet to agree terms for the Option Agreement for Lease, we reserve the ability to make personal reps or changes to these document in the future. My client has yet to agree terms for a...
Read more
-
My client has yet to agree terms for the Option Agreement for Lease, we reserve the ability to make personal reps or changes to these document in the future. My client has yet to agree terms for a...
Read more
-
The proposed Viking CCS pipeline and associated heavy construction works will have a direct, and we believe negative, impact on the lives and homes of residents in our village. Many local people have...
Read more
-
APPLICATION BY CHRYSAOR PRODUCTION (U.K.) FOR AN ORDER GRANTING DEVELOPMENT CONSENT FOR VIKING CCS PIPELINE Planning Inspectorate Reference Number: EN070008 Section 56 Planning Act 2008: Relevant...
Read more
-
Application route south-eastern extent of the pipeline is located just to the south of the Donna Nook Air Weapon Range estate, but is within the plan R (Range) statutory consultation zone. The MOD...
Read more
-
Relevant Representation: Viking CCS Pipeline 1.1 This representation is submitted by Air Products (BR) Limited (Air Products) in respect of the proposed Viking CCS Pipeline project (Viking). Air...
Read more
-
We act for DVSA and we have been liaising with solicitors and agents acting for the Promoter. DVSA occupies a site on which Promoter's agent has confirmed the Promoter intends to use, at the very...
Read more
-
Practical Comments - The works are carried out and completed on the land within a 12-month period ending June, to enable the land to be returned to full agricultural production, timely that autumn AND...
Read more
-
Planning Inspectorate Temple Quay House 2 The Square Bristol BS1 6PN Tuesday, 09 January 2024 To the Planning Inspectorate Planning Act (2008) as amended Relevant Representation made on behalf of...
Read more
-
Mablethorpe and Sutton Town Council resolved, at the planning meeting on Monday 8th January, to register as an interested party and be involved in the process with the objective of protecting our...
Read more
-
The proposed CO2 pipeline route overlaps with Uniper's high pressure natural gas pipeline from Theddlethorpe to Killingholme. There is a HSSE risk and therefore Uniper must be fully engaged at all...
Read more
-
Fully Withdrawn via REP1-106 The schemes has; • Failed to agree commercial terms due to a lack of meaningful consultation with the landowners and their agents • Failed to agree a method statement for...
Read more
-
Fully Withdrawn via REP1-098 The schemes has; • Failed to agree commercial terms due to a lack of meaningful consultation with the landowners and their agents • Failed to agree a method statement for...
Read more
-
We are an energy developer and service provider, deploying several large scale decarbonised energy projects across the UK, including potentially in the area to which the development relates...
Read more
-
Fully Withdrawn via REP1-120 My clients property is affected by a proposed permanent access route to the above ground infrastructure and there has been little consultation regarding this. Also, the...
Read more
-
Good afternoon, The following comments were sent direct to Viking CCS's agent (Gately Hamer) on Friday 2nd December 2023 via E Mail, which also included an attached set of shape files identifying the...
Read more
-
The schemes has; • Failed to agree commercial terms due to a lack of meaningful consultation with the landowners and their agents • Failed to agree a method statement for the pipeline construction and...
Read more
-
Fully Withdrawn via REP1-141 The schemes has; • Failed to agree commercial terms due to a lack of meaningful consultation with the landowners and their agents • Failed to agree a method statement for...
Read more
-
Fully Withdrawn via REP1-142 The schemes has; • Failed to agree commercial terms due to a lack of meaningful consultation with the landowners and their agents • Failed to agree a method statement for...
Read more
-
Fully Withdrawn via REP1-096 My client wishes to raise the following concerns surrounding the project; • Failure to agree commercial terms due to a lack of meaningful consultation with the landowners...
Read more
-
•Failure to agree commercial terms due to a lack of meaningful consultation with the landowners and their agents •Failure to agree a method statement for the pipeline construction and failure to...
Read more