Back to list A303 Stonehenge

Representation by Jim Fisher

Date submitted
12 December 2018
Submitted by
Members of the public/businesses

  1. Damage to the World Heritage Site

  2. In the consultation, no alternative given which would not do such damage

  3. Conflict between such road proposals and the government's stated policy of acting to control global warming (the increased traffic and traffic speeds will do the opposite).

  4. The loss of view of Stonehenge from the road

  5. Loss of view from the road and making it impossible to view the stones without payment

  6. Damage to the archaeology and setting of a World Heritage Site

  7. Lack of alternative options which would not cause this damage, in the consultation 4.Increased noise and pollution from faster traffic and from its inecitable increase in volume