Representation by Carrie Jackson
- Date submitted
- 17 December 2018
- Submitted by
- Members of the public/businesses
The form is very simple – you fill in your details* Give the reasons why you are objecting without going into great detail. Examples could include (but please use your own words): Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting Lack of alternative options in consultation that would not damage the World Heritage Site Loss of the view from the road and need to pay to see the Stones in future Disturbance of rare bird species (Stone Curlew and Great Bustard) Increased noise from faster traffic This is a terrible idea to create around an ancient archeological site, unique to the planet..how do you know how this will not disturb the energies of the unseen workings of such an ancient site...we do not understand the energetic workings of such a site.
Terrible irreparable damage to a unique historical site, recognised by UNESCO Lack of alternative options to choose from As a result, possible damage to another ancient site, Blick Mead Mesolothic site and its surroundings
Loss of local special wildlife such as the stone curlew and great bustard Creating an eyesore and no longer being able to view the stones while passing and have to pay in future just to see the site