Representation by James Wicks
- Date submitted
- 7 January 2019
- Submitted by
- Members of the public/businesses
I am dyslexic so pls forgive any miss phrasing or spelling, this is the best I can do.
The risk of damage to the site and the wider environment has already been proven even by its advocates to be unacceptably high and has already demonstrated insufficient measures or oversight to prevent irreparable damage both to this and surrounding sites. I have studied archaeology the list of problems is far greater then I can fit here but all qualified and impartial parties object as do I. Risk avoidance and non intervention are the 1st fundamental principles of any archaeology, this whole project completely disregards that.
There has been insufficient oversight or challenge to the projected claims of the projects benefits, or cost of construction, or who really stands to benefit.
There has been no proper consultation on the alternatives.