Back to list A303 Stonehenge

Representation by Charles David Foulstone

Date submitted
10 January 2019
Submitted by
Members of the public/businesses
  1. I object to this Proposal on the grounds of the inevitable major disturbance, probable irreversible damage & possible destruction to an ancient & irreplaceable monument that the proposal will cause.
  2. Should the proposed major highway be considered totally necessary, there are several alternative routes sufficiently distant from this ancient monument for construction to be undertaken without threat to this National asset.
  3. Considerable expense has been incurred in the last decade in fencing off & policing Stonehenge to protect it from possible deterioration due to foot traffic from tourists & similar visitors. It would call into question the credulity of Local & National authorities if this expense should now be declared irrelevent by the major damage resulting from this proposal