Back to list A303 Stonehenge

Representation by Wayne Hepworth

Date submitted
10 January 2019
Submitted by
Members of the public/businesses

I am against the project, and would make arguments against commencement on the following grounds:

  • Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
  • UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
  • Lack of addressment on the concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting.
  • Lack of alternative options that would not damage the World Heritage Site in the consultation.
  • Loss of view from the road and need to pya to see the Stones.
  • Disturbance of rare bird species (Stone Curlew and Great Bustard).
  • Increased noise / vibration (and associated damage) from more and faster traffic.