Back to list A303 Stonehenge

Representation by Jonathan Morris

Date submitted
11 January 2019
Submitted by
Members of the public/businesses

The documents used to provide evidence for the submission appear to contain discrepancies whose effect is to reduce the benefit of the project and potentially make it fall outside National Policy guidelines on the grounds of lack of value. If considered relevant by the Inspectorate, the representation would detail those discrepancies for consideration.

Unfortunately this is complex subject matter involving the assumptions and wording used in the Contingent Valuation assessments and survey: It would be difficult to cover the reasoning for doubt over value in 500 words and I was also unsure whether or not the value to the community (of the proposals presented) falls within the Inspectorate's remit.