Back to list Lower Thames Crossing

Representation by Dr D J van Rest

Date submitted
11 January 2023
Submitted by
Members of the public/businesses

Insufficient consideration has been given to the consequence of generated traffic on the M25, especially on the pinch point of Bell Common tunnels which would be expensive and difficult to widen. Neither has the possibilities of congestion charging on the Dartford Crossing to spread the peak loads and increase capacity been examined, which could allow the scheme to be delayed to a financially more healthy time. This project is contrary to the five elements Government Policy in that it encourages long distant commuting, generates extra traffic, promotes alternative activities to healthy local ones, reduces green and recreational space. The extra traffic will be a special burden for the M25, particularly the Bell Common tunnels, which would be difficult and expensive to widen. Lack of capacity on the Dartford Crossing is disproved by the practice of not collecting tolls at night. No attempt has been made to spread peak loading by congestion charges, even though the required number plate recognition cameras are in place. The current shortage of skilled workers for urgent construction projects, would be worsened by prioritizing this scheme.