Filter
Lower Thames Crossing

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1 to 25 of 1148 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • AA Peluso

    This entire project must be stopped as per my original submission. The destruction of land, increased noise, pollution and traffic damage must stop.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Adam

    This project should be cancelled. Ever more roads are yesterday's solution and the projects's own figures demonstrate how insignificant the contribution of this road is predicted to be against... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Alan Howard

    I am not convinced of the viability of building a new lower Thames Crossing.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Alan Paul Camfield

    I object to this on the basis of building more roads just leads to more traffic , more pollution , more bad news for CO2 accumulation and the bad effects on climate change and the bad effects on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Alistair Baxter

    I wish to make comments on the relevance of this project to both national and regional transport infrastructure. Also the development and future potential for both cross-Thames and south-Thames... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Andrew Allman

    Speeding up traveling to Kent

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Andrew Gill-Cogan

    I am still waiting for an explanation as to why the project that would see the new Thames Crossing directly joining the southern end of the A130 is no longer an option. The driving force behind the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Andrew Goatly

    Given the climate crisis and the threats to a sustainable environment from resource depletion and covering land with tarmac we should do everything we can to reduce the use of cars. Internal... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Angela Jones

    In agreement with the plans

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Anna-Marie Nash

    I am in full support of planning to go ahead. I think it will be good for our transport system. reducing pollution, being better for the environment and also a fantastic opportunity to join Essex with... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Anthony Barry Barton

    The process to produce the crossing is long and detailed. The inclusion has been impressive but it is now time to press onto completion of this much needed project.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Barry David George Osborne

    i need to know that the new crossing is a/ environmentally observing local nature activities b/ efficient and not extending budgets c/ coming in on the correct build times and not delayed d/... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Barry Hawkins

    I pay my Council Tax and am a member of the Labour Party. This crossing is close to my house in Kent and affects my property

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Bhoseok Nam

    There is an overwhelming need for this Project on balance and I support the proposals.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Bill Hollis

    The lower Thames Crossing is a much needed infrastructure project. The delays at the dartford crossing are intolerable. Standing traffic creates huge volumes of pollution. Older vehicles do not have... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Bill Wiseman

    I support this development. South Essex and North Kent is in danger of becoming choked by traffic heading from North of London for the continent. The M25 / Dartford Crossing is no longer able to cope... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Brian Dobson

    My life will be negatively impacted by the furtherance of this project and I believe that the project is unnecessary in its present form and that, should the project go forward, there will be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Bruce Michael Drew

    Faster and less stressful access to Dover ferries and channel tunnel from our Essex home. The Dartford Bridge and Tunnels are a major bottleneck in our journeys at present. The Lower Thames Crossing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Claire Richardson

    I would like to make a representation opposing the LTC on the following points, where I feel this project in this location will not stand up to scrutiny • The inadequacy of the LTC to provide... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Colin Ivin

    I live on [Redacted], and i am concerned that this road will become a rat run for people to get to the LTC.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Councillor Sue Sammons

    This plan affects the area where I represent and live and ihave concerns about the build

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Cyril Gregory

    The principle submissions I intend to make are on the environmental impact of the project. This would be on the fauna and flora within the immediate region as well as further afield. I would like to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Dan Williams

    I commute to work in Harlow Essex via the M25 and Dartford Crossing so I am fully behind the new Lower Thames Crossing in principle as long as it doesn't overtly and unnecessarily harm the local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Daphne Revell

    This crossing should be at the A.130 via a Tunnel under the Thames to the M.2 in Kent.This was an option at the start of the Lower Thames Crossing choices, and then removed. It would be the least... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023

  • Darren Bartholomew

    As our property directly borders the development and there will be a new combined footpath / bridleway / cycle path running along the back of our garden once the scheme is built I wish to be able to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 January 2023