Filter
Lower Thames Crossing

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 501 to 600 of 1148 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | View 50 results per page | 100

  • Andrew Keeler

    Consideration for the impact on aquatic wildlife including but not limited to Fish, invertebrates, crustations, water and land insects, birds and land animals that use, rely appon and frequent,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Angharad Johnson

    As a local resident of Strood I am deeply concerned about the environment impact that the proposed project could have upon our local area. The construction of the crossing would cause awful... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Anne Rea

    While I consider there is a need the lower Thames crossing I personally consider the current proposal unworkable and complicated. In my view the crossing should be built on the Isle of Grain at the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Aubrey Nestor

    My primary representation is that the whole LTC proposal should be scrapped. It's original aim when the project was kicked off many years ago was to reduce congestion at the Dartford Crossing. By HE's... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Brian Seeger

    To ensure the lower thames crossing will be able to carry enough traffic to substantially reduce congestion at the Dartford crossing

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Carol Goldsmith

    Concerned about the detrimental affect to Baker Street end of Orsett village. Also concerns about disruption during construction

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Chris Windle

    I am a truck driver [Redacted]and I fully support the lower Thames crossing, it can’t come soon enough.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Climate Emergency Planning and Policy (Climate Emergency Planning and Policy )

    Dr Andrew Boswell, Climate Emergency Planning and Policy I am an independent environmental consultant. I object to the Lower Thames Crossing: (1) The most important question is “to what extent does... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Clive James Rea

    While I consider there is a need for anther Thames crossing I personally consider the current proposal as the right idea but in the wrong place. In my view the tunnel should be built at Grain on the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Colin Johnson

    I fully accept and appreciate the need for this project as it will largely alleviate pressure on the A2 and divert much of the heavy goods vehicles around the southern approaches to London towards... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • David Penman

    I am concerned that not all measures that will reduce the noise and visual impact of the project on myself and other residents in East Tilbury are being taken. More specifically in relation to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Dr James Stevens

    As a local resident, scientist, and end user of the impacted environment and surrounds I echo the objections raised by the Essex Wildlife Trust: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Fiona Bunton

    I object to the LTC proposal for the the following reasons: *The proximity to the populated area of Ockendon *The impact on our listed buildings including St Nicholas church on the green. *The impact... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Gareth Oakland

    Building more road capacity is the wrong answer when we need to reduce emissions and traffic. If there is a need for another Thames crossing it should focus on mass transit and active travel... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Gary Bradbury

    To give support to the Application , on the basis of a M25 Dartford Crossing user over many years. To question strongly why the Application does not now include a proposal to build a new Services... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Helen Burgess

    My Land abuts the Hole Farm Community Land. We’re have a view across the valley to where the M25 and the A127 intersect, and the stretch of the M25 which is to be widened

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Ian Brown

    I intend to object to the proposed lower Thames crossing.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Jan Marshall

    I have serious concerns about the impact the Lower Thames Crossing will have on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • John Cheeseman

    We have put up with the traffic and congestion for long enough now.It is high time something is done about the lack of crossing places on the thames.We have put up with the failed east london river... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Jonathan Fox

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Karen Calder

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Lisa Gouge

    I am interested in the impacts that this has on my community, infrastructure, traffic, welfare of wildlife and surrounding areas. The impact it has on pollution where I live, mine and my families... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Malcolm Phelps

    My representation is that in order to reduce congestion at the present crossing, only vehicles not requiring an escort should be permitted through the present north bound tunnels.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Mark William Sopher

    1) The Environmental impact on the local eco systems of Thames marshes of Essex. 2) The Environmental impact on the local eco systems of Thames marshes of Kent. 3) The disruption and nuisance to local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Mr Chris Forsyth

    I live very close to the planned works and I'm concerned about the environmental impacts and construction related traffic during the building of the new road and junctions. I would like to ensure the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Mr Cristian J Ramis

    I am concerned about the impact the proposed project could have on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: • Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. • Damage to, and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Mr John F Reymond BSc CEng MIET

    Delighted that progress is at last being made on this long overdue project. The sooner constructon begins the better.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Mr Paul Walford BA(Hons)

    I consider that my views for this project are both valid and beneficial for all parties concerned. I would generally be supportive of a new river crossing, since it would ease congestion in SE London... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Mr. C. Hounsell

    Air quality and other environmental issues.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Natural England (Natural England)

    Representation to follow by email

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Nick Power

    Please just get on and build the thing I’m sick of being a local living person with all the misery of the traffic and air quality impact that causes.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Oliver Platts

    The Lower Thames Crossing as planned will: - Consume a great quantity of land resources for no good reason. Including: farmland needed for food security, potential land for housing to alleviate the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Paul Fisher

    The option needs to take proper account of residents opinions and it is vital that the eventual contractors act expeditiously and effectively

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Peter Hill

    Principally, the resulting congestion ease at the existing Thames Crossing at Dartford

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Ray Hockley

    The impact on the environment The provision of electric charging capability in line with carbon net zero goals The source of long term support and maintenance funding

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Recycled In Orsett Ltd (Recycled In Orsett Ltd)

    This development will aid businesses in the area to grow and work more efficiently and the crossing will allow for significant growth in the area, currently it is a absolute nightmare to get any flow... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Reg Ramm

    traffic congestion

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Richard Gethin

    I do not feel that enough consideration has been given to the problem of traffic passing through Sole Street to reach the tunnel from the south of Kent. A satnav will direct a driver on the most... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Richard Wheeler

    To support the building of LTC to relieve some of the traffic issues in north Kent and around Dartford

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Robert Heath

    I am concerned that Green Farm Lane will become a short cut between the Gravesend-Rochester Road and the Lower Higham Road. Green Farm Lane is a quiet country lane and has a 7.5T weight limit with a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Roger Hill

    REQUIRED TO REDUCE DELAYS AT THE DARTFORD CROSSING AND MAKE TRAVEL EASIER FROM EAST KENT

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Rosalind Young

    As a local school teacher who lives very close to the proposed route I am concerned for the pollution that this road construction will produce for my community especially for our young children.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Rowland Wheatley

    I am a regular user of the Dartford crossing from Kent. While I have not experienced long delays in crossing of late, I would welcome a second crossing. Also a crossing in the location proposed could... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Roy Tulkens

    Environmental Issues

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Suzanne Heath

    I am concerned about construction traffic using Green Farm Lane as a cut through from the Lower Higham Road to the Gravesend Road (this is a common problem that would become exacerbated once... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • T Turner

    I was unfortunate enough to live in Kent during the 70s and as a young boy did not appreciate the amount of destruction that was going on around me with the building of hundreds of thousands of houses... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Terence Fox

    This is a vital Thames crossing point and should have been built years ago.If the Dartford crossing are closed the effect are felt all the way up to London.Any terrorist action at Dartford could bring... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • The Boreham Family

    Dear Sirs, Myself and my wife Mr and Mrs Boreham [Redacted] object to the proposed scheme. We consider that our following business interests will be directly affected by the scheme: 1) The business of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Tony Cocca

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Tracy White

    The points I wish to make are in relation to how the construction and subsequent operation of the Lower Thames Crossing and associated road network are going to impact on my health and wellbeing. I... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Usman Kabbia

    I am hereby support for the proposed Lowe thames crossing route. Dridge and development Having this facilities development would enable me and my family to commute fast and easily for work

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • William Andrews

    The impacts the lower Thames crossing will cause on local and surrounding wildlife would be highly damaging. Also the impact on putting another crossing which isn't needed would be damaging to local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • William Wight

    The environmental impact of the proposed crossing outweighs the benefits.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 February 2023

  • Aisha Saher

    Increase in air and noise pollution, whole route fails on WHO-10 levels for PM2.5 No provision for cross river active travel, not viable for public transport due to lack of adequate connections... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Amanda Wolsey

    I live within a mile of the proposed motorway and I am concerned about the environmental impact generally as well as the negative impact on my quality of life.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Andrew Charlton

    I object to the scheme because although it may relieve some of the pressure on the Dartford Crossing I do not believe it is worth the money or upheaval it will cause. 1. Spending £9bn on a project at... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Anthony Biggs

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • BTF Partnership (BTF Partnership) on behalf of Baylis Family (Baylis Family)

    • The Interested Party is identified in the Statement of Reasons Annex B No. 59 and relates to Plots 11-36 and 11-37 • The Applicant has given insufficient consideration to a possible land swap with... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Celia Burns

    LTC is not ethically supportable

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Christopher Sewell

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: • Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. • Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Christopher Zgoda

    Road Traffic modelling through Parish of Cobham, Kent and adjacent areas during construction and operation of LTC - no detail provided on data used for modelling and consider modelling highly flawed -... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Claire Walker

    We do not need another road crossing of the Thames. We need to reduce private car use and get more freight onto rail and river. There are many more useful ways of spending the money set aside for this... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Coleen

    I feel the project is too expensive, is a in the wrong place (the local roads will not cope), will do environmental damage to our area, IF it is needed it needs to be in the right place and other... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Colin Hardy

    Yet another road project will not solve transport problems and in fact will negatively contribute to environmental damage. The funds would be far better spent on public transport, railways, buses,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • David Livitt

    The business case benefits are speculative and unavailable. The environmental impact is hugely under-stated. The cost and timescale are under-stated.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • David Mcsweeney

    I am completely against the construction of the lower Thames crossing. As a local resident I think it will blight the lives of myself and my family for generations to come.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Denise Drain

    Air quality in Thurrock. Already poor

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Edward Barratt

    I am very concerned about the impact on wildlife and their habitats. In particular I would like to highlight : Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Elaine Rogers

    Good afternoon, I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Fleur Derbyshire-Fox

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Francis Dunne

    Traffic Management in Grays and surroundings . Grays is badly affected when there are problems on the existing bridge or tunnel crossings. Traffic builds up and can cause traffic jams all the way back... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Gillian Davidoff

    I work closely with youth organisations in and around the south Ockendon & Thurrock areas, we have concerns that these groups are going to loose a lot of the country side that they have now because of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • BTF Partnership (BTF Partnership) on behalf of Gressier Family (Gressier Family)

    PROPERTY Puckle Hill, Shorne – residential property with private woodland and parkland extending in all to 34.23 ac (13.85ha). Owner-occupied by Interested Party. SCHEME 11.03 ha (27.26ac)... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • BTF Partnership (BTF Partnership) on behalf of GRT Holdings Limited (GRT Holdings Limited)

    • Statement of Reasons 4.1 under Annex B Schedule of Negotiations No327, identifies the engagement between the parties up to the point of submission of the DCO application and its subsequent... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Ian Isaac

    As a local resident want to ensure needs of local community are full considered in the application, both through the design and construction phase.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Iris Buffoni

    I am concerned about how close the LTC will be coming to my home. I cannot understand why ULEZ has been brought to Upminster, when the LTC is going to be to close.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • J. Merriott

    I do not want to see SW Essex have any more building structures, it is overcrowded now and to add another road tunnel is going to be detrimental to our wildlife and most of all to residents who will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Jaki Penfold

    I object on grounds of pollution and net zero targets not being met. I object on cost that should be put to more useful purposes ie new local NHS hospital and equipment. I object a on grounds that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Jamie Clark

    I would like to know the impact on air quality and noise pollution and what evidence there is to support all claims if this road was built.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Jane Higgins

    The concerns about air quality do not extend to the health risks of a 6 lane motorway through a built up area. The new road crossing poses real dangers to health The new road crossing removes valuable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Janet Murray

    The main points I will be regarding access routes to and from the tunnel. In principal I believe we need this crossing, now, and anything that brings this continual review process to a halt will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Jeff Belmour

    My representation will be against the building of the Lower Thames Crossing.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Jenny Scott-Thompson

    The lower Thames crossing is a terrible idea that is destroying the environment and will increase pollution through induced demand. Please stop encouraging private cars damaging our city.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Jonathan Olney

    Waste of over £10bn+, not value for money, false economy as other spending would be needed as direct result

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Julia Deeley

    I wish to object to the Lower Thames Crossing for the following reasons :- It will not relieve the problem at the DartfordTunnel It will create more pollution to the area It will increase heavy... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Karen Richardson-Judd

    I am against the new crossing,it will not decrease traffic but will increase the air pollution and cause more cases of asthma and other health conditions.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Kathryn Westell

    I do not wish this crossing, which will be of no useful purpose at all, to run across the fields at the back of my property. We’re being told to plant more trees to help with air quality etc. What... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Leonard Colin Gaunt

    I object to the Lower Thames Crossing as it will place a large residential area along with its surrounding green fields and recreational areas within a ring of major roads causing pollution of all... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • BTF Partnership (BTF Partnership) on behalf of Lesley Quigley (Lesley Quigley)

    PROPERTY 7 ac. (2.68 ha.) equestrian property with accommodation and grazing for 12 horses to the north of the A13 forming an equestrian livery facility owner-occupied by the Interested Party. SCHEME... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Lindsey White

    I do not believe that the LTC should be approved to come through East Tilbury and Linford. It will have a great impact on the environment and will not add anything of significance to the area except... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • M. B. Leahy

    Objection for the need for an additional crossing. Proposed crossing in wrong place. Hugely destructive and harmful. Doesn’t meet scheme objectives Would not solve the problems suffered due to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Marianne Kok

    I have concerns over the £10bn+++ LTC, and what a huge waste of taxpayers' money it would be . There are more enviormentally cheaper options like option A14 that was not looked at properly

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Marine Management Organisation (Marine Management Organisation)

    Good afternoon. Due to the word limit in this section, the Marine Management Organisation has submitted our relevant representation via e-mail to lowerthamescrossing@planninginspectorate.gov.uk on 17... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Martin Stitchman

    I have serious concerns about the new Lower Thames Crossing between Essex and Kent and its effects on the environment and natural world including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Mbeko Sihwa

    The crossing should be both a road and rail tunnel. There is no direct railway route between Essex and Kent. That would integrate the transport system and ease congestion on the Dartford tunnel. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Michael Bannister

    We presently suffer from an abnormal increased use of Chalk Road, Lower Higham, by HGV's, especially a skip company, namely RS Skips, based on the Apex Business Park. This could be alleviated if a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Michael Jiggens

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Mr Graham Neill

    The route won't help the issues at the Dartford Crossing and costs to build it are going up and up. The cost is too high when the country is suffering financially. Living near it is going to be awful... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Mr Michael Beiley

    I am primarily concerned about long term capacity of the new crossing and the degree to which it will be "future proofed" including the ability of the crossing to be expanded to provide additional... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Mrs Christine Rouse

    Cost of the LTC compared with previously considered options. Will not meet it's original purpose of reducing problems at the Dartford Crossing but will add to and create massive traffic problems in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023