Representation by Shabnam Rani
- Date submitted
- 13 September 2021
- Submitted by
- Members of the public/businesses
I would like to voice my opposition to these plans because I do not think they offer good value for money for UK taxpayers. Recent studies by Highways Magazine have shown that similar schemes have resulted in more traffic, more congestion and have failed to provide the economic boost that was promised - in fact making a negative return on investment. Given that the aim of the scheme is to improve transport links between Manchester and Sheffield in order to provide economic growth and better delivery of goods to businesses, I believe that reinstating rail routes would be much more cost effective. A ban on HGV’s could then be implemented which would solve the problems highlighted around traffic through local roads and villages. Much of this infrastructure already exists, which would result in better value for money. This country is recovering from the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. This is highlighted by the recent announcement to increase taxes. We should be looking at ways to reduce overall spending, and invest more wisely in schemes that will provide a demonstrable return. This proposal does very little to justify the costs involved and how this will bring about tangible benefits. I also think these proposals are very harmful to the environment and do very little to negate the impacts of increased emissions and destruction of natural habitats. During the pandemic, the UK government prioritised the nation’s health over the economy. Why should we now prioritise the economy over the climate and the health of our future generations?