Filter

A57 Link Roads (previously known as Trans Pennine Upgrade Programme)

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 826 to 850 of 909 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Savills (UK) Ltd (Savills (UK) Ltd) on behalf of Mr D Radford (Mr D Radford)

    Dear Sir/ Madam, I write on behalf of Mr. D Radford the freehold owners of part of the land affected by the A57 upgrade – land registry reference GM306567. The site comprises part of the central area... Read more

  • National Trust (National Trust)

    Introduction National Trust is a conservation charity with a membership of more than 5 million people. We are legally responsible for the protection of some of the most beautiful and environmentally... Read more

  • Neil Best

    1. This does not resolve the issue of traffic flowing across between Manchester and Sheffield. It simply redistributes part of it through small village communities that will suffer as a result. I live... Read more

  • Nicholas jenkinson

    Due to me working in Manchester I regularly travel up & down Mottram Moor & the M67. I have too time my journeys too work too avoid the rush hour traffic. This can add 30-60 minutes to my working day.... Read more

  • Noelle Arnfield

    I object to the proposed development of the A57 link as the proposed plan will increase the flow of traffic through Glossop thus impacting further on the level of air pollution in the valley.... Read more

  • Udo Pope on behalf of Peak and Northern Footpaths Society (Peak and Northern Footpaths Society)

    PNFS objects to the A57 Link Roads Scheme for the following reasons: 1. The adverse effect that the Scheme would have on users of the six footpaths that would be partially stopped up and diverted by... Read more

  • Peter Beard

    I am strongly in favour of the A 57 Link roads project. We need a bypass because of pollution from dense standing or slow moving traffic. Some days the queue takes 30 minutes to pass through Motram... Read more

  • Peter Knowles

    The bypass has been needed for years. The road queues in the surrounding area are time-wasting and frustrating for all motorists and also, as we are realising, bad for air quality. Must go ahead now... Read more

  • Peter Lea

    Bypass well and truly well overdue. No more delays please

  • Philip Bennett

    I lived in Hadfield for eleven years comuting between home Stockport, Ashton and Manchester daily finding the volume of trafic and the problems they caused intolerable not only to regular users on... Read more

  • Philip Hinchliff

    If this helps just 1% then at least its doing something because the roads around the area are shocking obviously they all need to lead up to building the bypass and linking up with it .also having a... Read more

  • R Blair

    Having lived in the area for 30+ years I have experienced an increase in volume of traffic. This leads to extended periods of time where traffic is at a standstill or extremely slow moving. The... Read more

  • Raimond Burgess

    This section of highway is traffic congested most times of the day for the sake of the residents and the environmental waste of fuel something should be done.

  • Richard Gibson

    I think the link road is a good idea and is long overdue . Anything to help the current terrible traffic situation is a must

  • Robert Faulkner

    Far from easing the load, the scheme would increase traffic, especially to Glossop. At a time when we are trying to cut emissions, the extra traffic would increase them. This would adversely affect... Read more

  • Ruth Pothecary

    I object to these By Pass for numerous reasons some of which are below: 1) The consultation appears incomplete and seriously flawed and was certainly not addressed to a sufficiently large enough area... Read more

  • Ruth Terry

    I think the proposed plans will not significantly change the traffic problem we have on glossop. With the increase of houses being built there will be a larger population trying to move around which... Read more

  • Sarah Beard

    I support the building of the Mottram Bypass and Glossop Spur road. I believe that the Glossop Spur will help to reduce congestion especially at Woolley Bridge and Mottram. It will also reduce the... Read more

  • Karen Burgess (Karen Burgess) on behalf of Skin Solutions Clinic (Skin Solutions Clinic)

    This section of highway is traffic congested most times of the day for the sake of the residents and the environmental waste of fuel something should be done. Hours of extra journey time for locals... Read more

  • Stephen Bagshaw

    1. Adverse landscape and visual impacts. 2. Loss of Open Access Land. 3. Threat to PDNP. A Trojan Horse for a Motorway by stealth 4. Threat to wildlife, conservation and the natural environment. 5.... Read more

  • Sue Moyes

    The spur road will make no difference, the congestion will just be moved somewhere else. All heavy transport should be banded from taking the short cut rough Hollingsworth and Tintwistle to get to the... Read more

  • Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council (Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council )

    Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council wishes to register to participate in the examination regarding the application by Highways England for an Order Granting Development Consent for the A57 Link... Read more

  • Thomas Hopkins

    The mottram bypass is long overdue and very much needed. It had been proven that it will reduce congestion through Glossop and must go ahead. Please proceed with my permission. Also, please ignore the... Read more

  • Thomas Wheeler

    There is a clear conflict between the Government’s policies on transport and climate change. On transport, they are promoting schemes such as this one which would encourage the use of private cars by... Read more

  • Tim Ibbotson

    I think the bypass should go ahead. It is vital to the local community