A47 Blofield to North Burlingham

Section 51 advice

The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.

There is a statutory duty, under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008, around an application or potential application. This includes recording the name of the person who requested advice and the advice given. This information has to be made publicly available.

Search advice

Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.

Showing 1 to 17 of 17 documents, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • View advice to Andrew Boswell

    Request for delivering presentation at a hearing. Dear James, Please find a letter attached for Inspector Hutson. The main points are that: - I request to make an approximately 30 minutes Powerpoint... Read more

  • View advice to Anglian Water Services Limited

    I've recently joined Anglian Water and identified that Anglian hasn't submitted Relevant Representations for the A47 Blofeld or the Tuddenham scheme. I've agreed with Highways England Programme lead... Read more

  • View advice to Norwich Cycling Campaign

    I am preparing a submission on behalf of Norwich Cycling Campaign which could amount to several thousand words as will be referring to many official policy and research papers. I have been trying to... Read more

  • View advice to Norwich Cycling Campaign

    I will be referring to up to twenty documents published by the Government, Norfolk County Council, Highways England and others. Do I need to load these to the Inquiry Website? Which section would be... Read more

  • View advice to Anglian Water Services Limited

    I wondered if it was too late for us to comment on this scheme? I believe we have a response circulating awaiting sign off and I’m hoping it won’t be too late to make the submission early next week.

  • View advice to Norfolk County Council

    (a) Word Limit In making the our representation / registering our submission online – is there any word limit at this stage? On previous NSIPs where the County Council has registered comments there... Read more

  • View advice to Andrew Boswell

    1. I note that there two versions of Chapter 14 on Climate Change. The Rev 0 (website: January 15th) version is 27 pages in length, and the Rev 1 (website: Feb 8th) version is 26 pages in length.... Read more

  • View advice to Anna Grace Randlesome

    The enquirer addressed concerns that they had not been identified as an Affected Person and sought clarification on information contained within certain application documents.

  • View advice to David Pett

    I refer to the recently published Volume 6.9 Reform to Inform Habitats Regulations Assessment and in particular the redacted parts of the text relating to the surveying of the bats. You will be aware... Read more

  • View advice to Norwich Cycling Campaign

    I prepared a submission to Highways England on behalf of Norwich Cycling Campaign on the dualling of the A47 Blofield to North Burlingham. Due to various personal matters I have been unable to follow... Read more

  • View advice to Office of Jerome Mayhew MP

    Mr Mayhew has been contacted by a constituent, Mr Gates, regarding the proposed dualling of the A47. Mr Gates’ full concerns are outlined below. ‘Our Community Group here at North Burlingham has been... Read more

  • View advice to Highways England

    Project update meeting

  • View meeting with Highways England

    Project update meeting

  • View meeting with Highways England

    Project update meeting and review of draft documents

  • View advice to Highways England

    A47 Projects Programme Update Meeting

  • View meeting with Highways England

    A47 Projects Programme Update Meeting

  • View advice to Highways England

    A47 Projects Update Meeting