The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.
-
I am a bit puzzled as I can't see how RiverOak can acquire the whole airport if they claim they are only altering it. Thee environmental info said that the runway is only been resurfaced, not lengthe...
Read more
-
Unfortunately I did not find that your reply dealt with the question, which was:
"could you kindly clarify if PINS have in place any targets regarding the publication of notes of meetings with DC...
Read more
-
Could you kindly clarify if PINS have in place any targets regarding the publication of notes of meetings with DCO applicants and, if not, what the public may reasonably expect in terms of your perfor...
Read more
-
In reply to an enquiry by Nigel Phethean (24 May 2018) you said:
“Any delay in the publishing of the note from the meeting with RSP on 11 May 2018 is a result of the drafting and finalisation process...
Read more
-
What part of the DCO process will enable PINS to say “enough is enough”?
Which begs the question “why not?”
Surely the draftees of PA2008 wouldn’t have drafted legislation that could be misused ...
Read more
-
RSP have said previously that they think they are a NSIP as they are altering the airport. If so, surely compaulsory acquisition powers should only be for the bits that are being altered and need pla...
Read more
-
Could you please tell me if RiverOak Strategic Partners have resubmitted their DCO application. If they have could you tell me why it has not been published on your website. If not have they set a dat...
Read more
-
It is now nearly two weeks since the meeting the Inspectorate held with RSP to explain its concerns about the documentation submitted leading to the withdrawal of the DCO application.
Given the growi...
Read more
-
Would you please explain just how this process allows a legitimate landowner to have the value of their investment permanently blighted as it seems to many that RSP could, if minded, continuously appl...
Read more
-
Is there any special reason why the meeting note in respect of the Feb 23rd meeting has taken almost 3 months to finalise?
How long do you anticipate the preparation and publication of the meeting ...
Read more
-
You have issued a clear exposition of some major concerns. Those concerns appear, on the face if it, to be incompatible with acceptance of the application as it the stood. Is that inference correct?...
Read more
-
Are you able to comment as to whether the applicant at this point has complied with their Schedule 4 obligations ?
-
Recent correspondence between PINS and interested parties have included the following statement however in view of the feedback issued to RSP on the 4/5/2018 which precipitated their withdrawal your d...
Read more
-
Our question as to whether this could be viewed in practice as a consultation period between PINS & RSP was really not answered. To an observer this does seem to be the case borne out by conferences y...
Read more
-
The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development during the Pre-application stage.
-
As there seems to be a lot of missing information in RSPs application that will have to be provided to PINS can you tell us whether these shortcomings will require another public consultation before R...
Read more
-
I have seen various comments suggesting that an applicant for a DCO must consider other ways in which they can deliver the stated aim of the NISP they are seeking to define. In the case of RSP the aim...
Read more
-
I am concerned that this DCO application which was vigorously supported by both Thanet's Conservative MPs may have been intended to cause what it has actually achieved. Namely the dropping of the prop...
Read more
-
I note that RSP declares on its website that it has "temporarily" withdrawn its application for a DCO. It claims that "this is not uncommon with DCOs and RSP is in dialogue with the Planning Inspecto...
Read more
-
Can you please tell me how common it is to withdraw an application on the day a decision to go ahead or not to is made thank you.
Roughly how many times before has this happened and it it expected b...
Read more
-
According to the PI's web site, the Manston application has been withdrawn. Yet when I go to the home page and select the filter to show only withdrawn status applications, no records are returned.
S...
Read more
-
We are told that RiverOak Strategic Partners has withdrawn its application for a Development Consent Order to reopen Manston Airport.
Further information has only come from one of the local MP's, S...
Read more
-
I would be grateful if you would respond by return to confirm the following;
• whether any s51 advice has been provided to RSP in relation to the submitted (and now withdrawn) proposed DCO A...
Read more
-
Please could you tell me how many times you will allow RSP to withdraw and resubmit their application? Is there a limit, or is this going to pause any sensible development of the site and of other loc...
Read more
-
If RSP are going to submit further details about the environmental impact to PINS should they not be required to show this information to the people who are likely to be worst affected?
-
Do you now take down your Manston page S51 advice etc and await a complete new application from RSP ?
-
Can the Planning Inspectorate please advise the number of applications to date which have been withdrawn by the applicant, along with the name or other reference for such withdrawn applications. An in...
Read more
-
Our understanding was this was an pre-application not a consultation period with PINS so we are wondering why this was discussed with them while the 28 day period was running, especially as there was ...
Read more
-
Our understanding was this was an pre-application not a consultation period with PINS so we are wondering why this was discussed with them while the 28 day period was running, especially as there was ...
Read more
-
Can you advise me that a new application will be looked on with fresh eyes and take as long as needed to make a decision.
please advise any new application will be treated at face value without al...
Read more
-
I understand that shortly before the deadine of 28 days consideration of their application, RSP have withdrawn such. Their plan appears to be to resubmit an application. I would be grateful if you w...
Read more
-
Project update meeting.
-
We note that PINS’ website has now been updated to confirm that RSP’s application has been submitted and that the Applicant has not agreed to the application documents being made public. We are extre...
Read more
-
Please see attachment.
-
Re the Manston DCO 2018 consultation, could you kindly send me details relating to the 2018 consultation notifications. I discussed this with Sam at the 2018 Comfort Inn consultation event, but then I...
Read more
-
On 19th April the sponsor posted this on their website see this link http://rsp.co.uk/news/statement-on-noise/ The release was not widely publicised. In this release they claim that they will revie...
Read more
-
Could you confirm that the DCO application for Manston has been submitted by RiverOak Strategic Partners and if it has when will the documents be published on your website?
-
Local press reported on Monday that RSP has submitted its DCO application. The applicants are quoted as having provided some 10,500 pages, a figure also voiced by the local MP.
I note that the cla...
Read more
-
Yesterday RSP announced that they had submitted their Manston DCO application to pins.
I understand that this triggers the 28 day period during which pins will decide if the can accept the applicatio...
Read more
-
Is there a summary dismissal procedure for application to minister or do I still have to wait for interested party submission stage. I am anxious to avoid applying for judicial review of Chief consta...
Read more
-
I understand the DCO application will be submitted to you next week. You've received a great deal of communication from members of the public on a wide range of issues in particular the adequacy of th...
Read more
-
Do you routinely accept submissions from people using fake identities and, if not why have you done so on this occasion?
Do you believe that accepting and publishing submissions from people using f...
Read more
-
Please can you note the report from mps over noise and night flights over London re Heathrow expansion. Please can you advise if these restrictions will apply to all new dco applications ie manston.
...
Read more
-
What additional due diligence will PINS carry out with respect to the Manston DCO taking into account the issues I raise in the paragraph above which apply to the sponsor Riveroak Strategic Partners L...
Read more
-
Our concern is with the impact that RiverOaks’ proposed development of the currently redundant airport site as a n international air cargo hub would have on the historic character and heritage of the...
Read more
-
What would be helpful to all involved in this process and particularly the large number of people who are concerned about the possibility of night flights, would be if you could confirm the following....
Read more
-
Please can you tell me what action you will be taking to correct the impression that I believe Sir Roger Gale has created of your departments supportive position regarding aviation at Manston Airport?
-
I’m reliably informed that your advice to developers is that: "“For the pre-application consultation process, applicants are advised to include sufficient preliminary environmental information to enab...
Read more
-
I recently (03.02.18) discovered that there is a request for a 24/7 freight hub at Manston Airport! Not only have I only just been made aware of this, which came from a social conversation (not from, ...
Read more
-
I'm writing to you regarding my concerns over the proposed plans for a Cargo Hub at Manston Airport put forward by Riveroak Strategic Partners (RSP). And more importantly the night flight situation th...
Read more
-
Will there be a requirement on the applicant to notify interested parties of a DCO submission?
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.
-
In view of the confusion between your two statements and in view of the guidance repeatedly issued by the Government and the courts on the scope of the general principle in s6 of the 1998 Act, I am as...
Read more
-
I suspect this is just another example of misinformation but I would be grateful if you could confirm my suspicions. According to this person the planning inspectorate has ruled that the site of the...
Read more
-
Query regarding the submission of its Adequacy of Consultation Representation.
-
I was relieved to receive your confirmation that there are no provisions in the Planning Act which would prevent you from acting compatibly with the Convention Rights.
I would also, respectfully, ...
Read more
-
Can the preapplication stage continue in perpetuity?
Are there circumstances where pins can cause the applicant to withdraw the application?
In terms of the deprivation issues relating to some ...
Read more
-
Could pins get their own itc department to look at the way the documents were published, particularly in terms of the deliberately making the documents difficult to use?
I think this constitutes a ...
Read more
-
Could you kindly clarify if it is the Planning Inspectorate's considered view that the provisions you mention in the Planning Act 2008 oust the duty placed on you as a public authority by s6 of the Hu...
Read more
-
The attached letter from No Night Flights makes representations concerning the lawfulness of accepting the proposed DCO application given what is known about the business case supporting the applicati...
Read more
-
Post-consultation and project update teleconference
-
The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
Please can you explain/reassure me that I have not wasted 20 hours+ on this and that my email will be submitted as a negative response to the recent public consultation process carried out by RSP.
-
The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
I have just received this response from you and am concerned that my email isn't being included as it says ' The Planning Inspectorate cannot consider representations about the merits of the proposed ...
Read more
-
Canterbury City Council would like to make representations on the current consultation undertaken by RiverOak Strategic Partners Ltd.
The City Council has not been consulted by RiverOak SP Ltd as p...
Read more
-
The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development, and the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, to the Planning Inspectorate and Thanet District Council.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.
-
The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 statutory consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.
-
The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 statutory consultation to the Planning Inspectorate, Thanet District Council and the Applicant.
-
The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 statutory consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 statutory consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate and Thanet District Council.
-
The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 statutory consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to both the Planning Inspectorate and the Applicant.
-
The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development to the Planning Inspectorate and Thanet District Council.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate and the Applicant.
-
The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate and Thanet District Council.
-
The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development and the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.
-
The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.