Manston Airport

Section 51 advice

The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.

There is a statutory duty, under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008, around an application or potential application. This includes recording the name of the person who requested advice and the advice given. This information has to be made publicly available.

Search advice

Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.

Showing 151 to 200 of 429 documents, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • View advice to Nigel Phethean

    Will there be a requirement on the applicant to notify interested parties of a DCO submission?

    Enquiry from: Nigel Phethean
    Date advice given: 21 March 2018

  • View advice to Peter Bateson

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.

    Enquiry from: Peter Bateson
    Date advice given: 19 March 2018

  • View advice to No Night Flights

    In view of the confusion between your two statements and in view of the guidance repeatedly issued by the Government and the courts on the scope of the general principle in s6 of the 1998 Act, I am... Read more

    Enquiry from: No Night Flights
    Date advice given: 15 March 2018

  • View advice to Peter Binding

    I suspect this is just another example of misinformation but I would be grateful if you could confirm my suspicions. According to this person the planning inspectorate has ruled that the site of the... Read more

    Enquiry from: Peter Binding
    Date advice given: 13 March 2018

  • View advice to Thanet District Council

    Query regarding the submission of its Adequacy of Consultation Representation.

    Enquiry from: Thanet District Council
    Date advice given: 12 March 2018

  • View advice to No Night Flights

    I was relieved to receive your confirmation that there are no provisions in the Planning Act which would prevent you from acting compatibly with the Convention Rights. I would also, respectfully,... Read more

    Enquiry from: No Night Flights
    Date advice given: 8 March 2018

  • View advice to Michael Child

    Can the preapplication stage continue in perpetuity? Are there circumstances where pins can cause the applicant to withdraw the application? In terms of the deprivation issues relating to some... Read more

    Enquiry from: Michael Child
    Date advice given: 8 March 2018

  • View advice to Michael Child

    Could pins get their own itc department to look at the way the documents were published, particularly in terms of the deliberately making the documents difficult to use? I think this constitutes a... Read more

    Enquiry from: Michael Child
    Date advice given: 6 March 2018

  • View advice to No Night Flights

    Could you kindly clarify if it is the Planning Inspectorate's considered view that the provisions you mention in the Planning Act 2008 oust the duty placed on you as a public authority by s6 of the... Read more

    Enquiry from: No Night Flights
    Date advice given: 6 March 2018

  • View advice to No Night Flights

    The attached letter from No Night Flights makes representations concerning the lawfulness of accepting the proposed DCO application given what is known about the business case supporting the... Read more

    Enquiry from: No Night Flights
    Date advice given: 23 February 2018

  • View meeting with RiverOak Strategic Partners Ltd

    Post-consultation and project update teleconference

    Meeting with: RiverOak Strategic Partners Ltd
    Date of meeting: 23 February 2018

  • View advice to Appolonius Claudius

    The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: Appolonius Claudius
    Date advice given: 21 February 2018

  • View advice to PJ Brown

    The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: PJ Brown
    Date advice given: 21 February 2018

  • View advice to Rebekah Smith

    Please can you explain/reassure me that I have not wasted 20 hours+ on this and that my email will be submitted as a negative response to the recent public consultation process carried out by RSP.

    Enquiry from: Rebekah Smith
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Adem Mehmet

    The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: Adem Mehmet
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Malcolm Kirkaldie

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: Malcolm Kirkaldie
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Chris Welsh

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: Chris Welsh
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Rebekah Smith

    I have just received this response from you and am concerned that my email isn't being included as it says ' The Planning Inspectorate cannot consider representations about the merits of the proposed... Read more

    Enquiry from: Rebekah Smith
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Canterbury City Council

    Canterbury City Council would like to make representations on the current consultation undertaken by RiverOak Strategic Partners Ltd. The City Council has not been consulted by RiverOak SP Ltd as... Read more

    Enquiry from: Canterbury City Council
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Josephine Canty

    The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: Josephine Canty
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Teresa Askew

    The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development, and the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, to the Planning Inspectorate and Thanet District Council.

    Enquiry from: Teresa Askew
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Fiona Simmons

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.

    Enquiry from: Fiona Simmons
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Conor Kelly

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: Conor Kelly
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Rebekah Smith

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.

    Enquiry from: Rebekah Smith
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Clare Dove

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.

    Enquiry from: Clare Dove
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Liz Green

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.

    Enquiry from: Liz Green
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Jeni Butler

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.

    Enquiry from: Jeni Butler
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Debra Cluff

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.

    Enquiry from: Debra Cluff
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Rebecca Wing

    The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 statutory consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: Rebecca Wing
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Nikki Hildesley

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.

    Enquiry from: Nikki Hildesley
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Mike Collins

    The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 statutory consultation to the Planning Inspectorate, Thanet District Council and the Applicant.

    Enquiry from: Mike Collins
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to John Hanna

    The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 statutory consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: John Hanna
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Sylvie Bolioli

    The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 statutory consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: Sylvie Bolioli
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Conor Masterson

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.

    Enquiry from: Conor Masterson
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Matthew Cumber

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate and Thanet District Council.

    Enquiry from: Matthew Cumber
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Pierre and Patricia Jeanrenaud

    The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 statutory consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: Pierre and Patricia Jeanrenaud
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Cathy Rogers

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: Cathy Rogers
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Anna Blasiak

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.

    Enquiry from: Anna Blasiak
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Chris Lowe

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to both the Planning Inspectorate and the Applicant.

    Enquiry from: Chris Lowe
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Anthony Howard

    The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development to the Planning Inspectorate and Thanet District Council.

    Enquiry from: Anthony Howard
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Matthew Griffiths

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate, the Applicant and Thanet District Council.

    Enquiry from: Matthew Griffiths
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to C & P Arnold

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate and the Applicant.

    Enquiry from: C & P Arnold
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Michelle Meyer-Masterson

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation, with their consultation response, to the Planning Inspectorate and Thanet District Council.

    Enquiry from: Michelle Meyer-Masterson
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Alan Ashby

    The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: Alan Ashby
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Brian Bushell

    The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: Brian Bushell
    Date advice given: 19 February 2018

  • View advice to Danika Jarrett

    The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development and the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: Danika Jarrett
    Date advice given: 17 February 2018

  • View advice to Christopher Burrows

    The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: Christopher Burrows
    Date advice given: 16 February 2018

  • View advice to AB Doughty

    The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: AB Doughty
    Date advice given: 16 February 2018

  • View advice to Mr and Mrs James

    The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: Mr and Mrs James
    Date advice given: 16 February 2018

  • View advice to Andrew Taylor

    The enquirer sent their response to the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation to the Planning Inspectorate.

    Enquiry from: Andrew Taylor
    Date advice given: 16 February 2018