Advice to S Alvers
Back to listEnquiry
- From
- S Alvers
- Date advice given
- 26 September 2018
- Enquiry type
From the information in the public domain it is not clear what has changed with regard to RSP's submission that allowed this change of stance where the previous advice, regarding RSP's withdrawn Application of May 2018, was clearly that in PINS view there was insufficient evidence provided by RSP to base any such assessment on. Can this omission be clarified?
On the JR point I understand that an acceptance decision could not actually be JR'd until the examination is concluded. Is this not correct?
Advice given
In its resubmitted application, RSP provided additional evidence (for example in its updated NSIP Justification Document (Doc 2.3)) which enabled the Planning Inspectorate to reach the conclusion expressed in Box 3 of the Acceptance of Applications Checklist.
Section 118 of the Planning Act 2008 sets out the statutory periods associated with legal challenges. If you require further assistance in respect of this matter, please contact the Administrative Court Office on 0207 947 6655 or follow this link: http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/rcj-rolls-building/administrative-court/applying-for-judicial-review