Manston Airport

Section 51 advice

The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.

There is a statutory duty, under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008, around an application or potential application. This includes recording the name of the person who requested advice and the advice given. This information has to be made publicly available.

Search advice

Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.

Showing 1 to 25 of 429 documents, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • View advice to Barry James

    Request for clarification in respect of s51 advice issued to enquirer on 19 July 2019.

    Enquiry from: Barry James
    Date advice given: 25 July 2019

  • View advice to Ian Scott

    Please tell us will the examiners still consider all the oral and written submissions to the DCO enquiry made by SHP as we believe most of it is still relevant to the application by RSP?

    Enquiry from: Ian Scott
    Date advice given: 25 July 2019

  • View advice to Peter Binding

    As I hope you can imagine, the decision by the owners of the site to sell the land to the applicants at the eleventh hour is causing some consternation in the areas which are likely to be most... Read more

    Enquiry from: Peter Binding
    Date advice given: 25 July 2019

  • View advice to John Walker

    I would be grateful if you could update me on the position with regard tot he SHP evidence submitted during the course of the Inquiry and whether this still falls to be considered by the Examining... Read more

    Enquiry from: John Walker
    Date advice given: 25 July 2019

  • View advice to Samara Jones-Hall

    Could you please confirm that a) all Stone Hill Park's submissions will stand and be used by the Examiners in making their recommendation; and b) that Stone Hill Park's submissions will still carry... Read more

    Enquiry from: Samara Jones-Hall
    Date advice given: 19 July 2019

  • View advice to Ros McIntyre

    I have just seen the letter from SHP in which it says that, subject to satisfactory completion of its land sale to RSP, it will withdraw its objections to the DCO. What does this mean? The evidence... Read more

    Enquiry from: Ros McIntyre
    Date advice given: 19 July 2019

  • View advice to The Ramsgate Society

    I raise two important Issues on which we need clarification, as follows: 1) The ExA policy regarding, and the status of, late (post 9/7/19) submissions accepted after the close of the examination. 2)... Read more

    Enquiry from: The Ramsgate Society
    Date advice given: 19 July 2019

  • View advice to Barry James

    As per the 3rd paragraph of this letter could you confirm whether every submission from SHP and their associates will remain on the PINS website for the full 5 years as per your original response... Read more

    Enquiry from: Barry James
    Date advice given: 19 July 2019

  • View advice to Ian Scott

    We have just read SHP’s latest letter to the examiners regarding the sale to RSP in which they state they wish to withdraw their objections & representations on completion of the sale. We understand... Read more

    Enquiry from: Ian Scott
    Date advice given: 19 July 2019

  • View advice to Georgina Rooke

    Can you please confirm the SHP’s submissions posted to your website are a matter of public record and cannot be withdrawn or ‘unknown’ by yourselves and will continued to be relied- upon?

    Enquiry from: Georgina Rooke
    Date advice given: 19 July 2019

  • View advice to Adem Mehmet

    I understand that following the sale by SHP to RSP last week, SHP are obliged to withdraw all their evidence and objections to the DCO. Can you tell me whether they are able to do this and if so does... Read more

    Enquiry from: Adem Mehmet
    Date advice given: 19 July 2019

  • View advice to Christabel Bradley

    I am writing seeking reassurance that the written submissions by Stone Hill Park already submitted to you, and posted on your website, will remain in the public domain.

    Enquiry from: Christabel Bradley
    Date advice given: 19 July 2019

  • View advice to Susan Kennedy

    I have just seen the letter from SHP in which it says that, subject to satisfactory completion of its land sale to RSP, it will withdraw its submissions/objections to the Manston DCO. Surely this... Read more

    Enquiry from: Susan Kennedy
    Date advice given: 19 July 2019

  • View advice to James Chappell

    I understand that it is the intention of the Applicant to make subsequent submissions directly to the SoST. Will these submissions be published on the Project website in a timely manner? Will IPs be... Read more

    Enquiry from: James Chappell
    Date advice given: 19 July 2019

  • View advice to Alan Welcome

    i. Will RSP's interactions with the SoS be transparent? If not why not? ii. Can people opposed to RSP's cargo hub plans comment on RSP's submissions to the SoS and/or lobby the SoS? If so, will the... Read more

    Enquiry from: Alan Welcome
    Date advice given: 19 July 2019

  • View advice to Stone Hill Park Ltd

    Request for confirmation of receipt and acceptance into Examination of letters from Stone Hill Park Ltd and Kent Facilities Ltd, both dated 9 July 2019.

    Enquiry from: Stone Hill Park Ltd
    Date advice given: 18 July 2019

  • View advice to Adem Mehmet

    I note that RSP have said they will make further representations directly to the Secretary of State after the 9 July closing. Is this possible and if so are other interested parties also able to make... Read more

    Enquiry from: Adem Mehmet
    Date advice given: 9 July 2019

  • View advice to Ian Scott

    On further reading of BDB’s letter to PINS regarding the sale of Manston to RSP they seem to be inferring RSP will be dealing with the Secretary of State directly. Could you tell me if that is a... Read more

    Enquiry from: Ian Scott
    Date advice given: 8 July 2019

  • View advice to Samara Jones-Hall

    How long do submissions stay up on the Planning Inspectorate website? And, secondly is it all submissions that stay up?

    Enquiry from: Samara Jones-Hall
    Date advice given: 8 July 2019

  • View advice to Mark de Pulford

    I read that failure to adhere to a voluntary scoping opinion is conclusively fatal to a DCO in terms of the new EU settlement. Is that PINS's understanding too?

    Enquiry from: Mark de Pulford
    Date advice given: 25 January 2019

  • View advice to David Green

    In a previous question, I asked whether a development consent obligation could be imposed upon the applicant during or as a result of the examination. Could you also tell me whether it might be... Read more

    Enquiry from: David Green
    Date advice given: 24 January 2019

  • View advice to Michael Child

    I have had very little time to examine the 11,000 pages of the DCO application since it was submitted. My old school, Lord Mayor Treloar College for the Disabled, is implicated in the current infected... Read more

    Enquiry from: Michael Child
    Date advice given: 16 November 2018

  • View advice to Michael Grantham

    What action has or will be taken to ensure that representations (from both sides) are above board and genuine? I sincerely have no problem with genuine representations opposed to the Airport – we live... Read more

    Enquiry from: Michael Grantham
    Date advice given: 25 October 2018

  • View advice to Adem Mehmet

    On your web page for this project it states that "The Applicant (RiverOak Strategic Partners Ltd) must certify to the Planning Inspectorate that it has complied with its application notification... Read more

    Enquiry from: Adem Mehmet
    Date advice given: 16 October 2018

  • View advice to David Green

    The National Planning Guidance states that section 106 agreements should be used to mitigate the effects of otherwise unacceptable developments. I know that RSP have argued against a 106 agreement... Read more

    Enquiry from: David Green
    Date advice given: 12 October 2018