1. Section 51 advice
  2. Advice in detail

Advice to Stephen Kirkwood

Back to list

Enquiry

From
Stephen Kirkwood
Date advice given
23 October 2012
Enquiry type
Email

I am finding it very difficult to negotiate my way through both the site and the process. The Planning Inspectorate stated a couple of weeks ago that the proposed wetland creation site was not part of this application and the panel viewd it as adifferent planning application. Why then am finding on the IPC site consistent references to it and also how is it possible for this proposed wetland site to be considered in the Amep development. Is this anotherchange to the application or not.

Advice given

I understand your frustrations with our website and can only apologise. As I have indicated previously, hard copies of the documents are deposited locally for people to view.

With regard to the applicants revised arrangements for temporary mitigation land I advise you as follows.

The proposed temporary mitigation land at Old Little Humber Farm has been removed from the application and is no longer a matter for consideration. The applicant has indicated that they have applied to East Riding of Yorkshire Council for permission to create a temporary mitigation site at Cherry Cobb. This is entirely separate from the DCO application being considered by the Examining Authority and they are not responsible for consenting that proposal. Despite this, it is a relevant and important matter in the consideration of the wider scheme and the information is available to the Examining Authority so as to allow them to understand the whole package of proposed compensation measures.