We use some essential cookies to make this service work.
We'd also like to use analytics cookies so we can understand how you use the service and make improvements.
You’ve accepted analytics cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.
You’ve rejected analytics cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.
beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it
The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.
There is a statutory duty, under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008, around an application or potential application. This includes recording the name of the person who requested advice and the advice given. This information has to be made publicly available.
Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.
Showing 26 to 38 of 38 documents, newest first.
Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page
The IPC has advised that the Model Provisions are to be revoked in due course. Do you have an idea of the timescale for this happening?
We are looking at our draft Development Consent Order and the Model Provisions Regulations and would be grateful of the IPC's guidance on the following. 1) The foot note to Article 5 of the Model... Read more
Meeting to discuss: ? Any known transitional arrangements to MIPU ? IPC comments on draft scoping report ? Addition of DIRFT 2 link (to be explained) ? Consideration of Alternatives ? S.42... Read more
Request explanation why DIRFT Phase 3 is to be handled by the IPC as an NSIP under the 2008 Planning Act. DIRFT Phases 1 and 2 were handled by ordinary planning procedures. There is no explanation... Read more
Whether section 106 agreements have a place in the IPC regime and, if so, who initiates and negotiates them and when.
Can IPC confirm which Secretary of State will deal with this type [Rail Freight Interchange] of NSIP.
I understand the LPA's are required to submit an Local Impact Report (LIR). Would Warwickshire County Council be expected to do this as the development in Northamptonshire but abuts Warwickshire? I am... Read more
With regard to the meeting held on 15 February 2011 between Prologis Development, Marrons and the IPC, a number of Technical Questions were asked by Morag Thomson of Marrons to the IPC.
Meeting between the IPC, Marrons and Prologis Developments Limited:
Attached to the email was a comprehensive list of the first draft application documents. The applicant asked for any comments on these proposed documents. Including a query about Reg 5(2)(o) and which... Read more
Meeting with the IPC, the applicant and Local Authorities to discuss the Planning Act 2008.
A meeting held at the IPC offices to discuss both the legal issues pertaining to proposed DIRFT 3 scheme and the Overall Timetable.
Does the IPC have jurisdiction to accept applications under s73 TCPA 1990 for variation of conditions when the development concerned benefits from an extant planning permission but is also a... Read more
Pagination navigation
Showing 26 to 38 of 38 results