Filter

The Sizewell C Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 976 to 1000 of 1290 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Christopher George

    The application fails to take account of the latest Intergovernemental Panel on Climate Change projections on predicted sea level rise and in particular the likelihood and magnitude for tidal surges... Read more

  • Christopher J Leggett

    This site is inappropriate for the proposed development due to the serious damage that would be done to the fragile coastal landscape, known for its beauty and instability. There would be immediate... Read more

  • Christopher Smith

    Sizewell C will have a significant negative impact on the area. - It is in an area of outstanding natural beauty including the nature reserve Minsmere which will suffer from the development of the... Read more

  • Claire Chilvers

    I object to Sizewell C as it is a huge development in an area with poor roads/infrastructure and the impact it will have on wildlife. Most businesses have trouble getting permission to build one house... Read more

  • Claire Whittenbury

    This would be a disaster for the region

  • Clare Sheehan

    I am very much opposed to the Sizewell C development. it will decimate a beautiful area of suffolk coast, much of which is an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. I understand we need to generate power... Read more

  • Clare Turner

    Outdated and hugely expensive technology. Site selection Impacts on Minsmere, nearby SSSI i.e. the very narrow corridor near Sandy Lane between land and sea and all the wildlife in the broader area.... Read more

  • Clive Gissing

    This remote part of the Suffolk coast is completely inappropriate and impractical for building such a large Nuclear Power Station. This is obvious to many in Suffolk opposing the development - we’re... Read more

  • Cllr T J Haworth-Culf

    Cumulative impact of this project alongside the multiple Energy NSIP’s coming forward on this coast requires consideration as the current plans would result in chaos. An early overview from the... Read more

  • Colin Cooper

    It is my opinion that the Sizwell C application should be approved and the station constructed - because 1 - This area desperately requires the the quantity and quality jobs that will be created... Read more

  • Cordelia Richman

    This project must not go ahead and please do not allow it to go ahead. In-depth studies by Friends of the Earth demonstrate that the proposed Sizewell C construction works would cause permanent damage... Read more

  • D Watson

    Local geology stability concerns. This site is marshland over sand/clays and saturated chalk, essentially on an ancient riverbed. This proposed area is highly vulnerable to future engulfment from the... Read more

  • Daisy Haworth

    Cumulative impact of this project alongside the multiple Energy NSIP’s coming forward on this coast requires consideration as the current plans would result in chaos. An early overview from the... Read more

  • Daniel Thompson

    The science is clear that Sizewell C is a vital step forward in our fight against climate change. It is by far the cleanest and least environmentally impactful way to provide energy for the local... Read more

  • Savills (UK) Ltd (Savills (UK) Ltd) on behalf of David and Belinda Grant (David and Belinda Grant)

    Our client's concerns are outlined in the ‘Outline Representations’ detailed below prepared by NFU and LIG. Our client may decide it is necessary to appoint a barrister and experts to act on their... Read more

  • David Breen

    I wish to register the following concerns about the proposed Sizewell C development: I am opposed to the proposed development on the following grounds: The Site The site identified for Sizewell C is... Read more

  • David Freeland

    I am against this development, on the grounds of cost, storage of waste on site, the impact on the surrounding environment and this technology is flawed

  • David Mandela Jesse

    I don't think nuclear power is a safe or acceptable technology to be carrying forward into the future.

  • David McLean

    My comments relate to Pledge 4 of the Sizewell C documentation. As a general observation, the reference to “40% of construction materials by rail and sea” is completely unsatisfactory because it... Read more

  • Deborah Thomas

    The reason so many of us choose to live and work in east Suffolk and more come here to holiday is its outstanding natural beauty . This would be massively impacted by the construction of this huge... Read more

  • Denise Parry

    Dear Sir/Madam, I am opposed to the proposed Sizewell C development on the following grounds: The damage to our fragile Suffolk coastline will be immeasurable: our areas of natural beauty will be... Read more

  • Derek Walduck

    I believe that if the Sizewell C development were to go ahead it would have a very detrimental effect on our area. My reasons include, among others: * our rural communities would be overwhelmed by the... Read more

  • Diana Huntingford

    I am concerned of the effect of this proposal on this fragile and valued environment of the East Suffolk Coast, on the continued effect of coastal erosion. It seems to me the economic impact of this... Read more

  • Diana Quick

    I am concerned about the IMPACT on the local environment including *Transport and the increase of traffic and access on inadequate roads, and the siting of the 2 park and ride facilities *the housing... Read more

  • Don Foster

    Concerns regarding the environment, transport and the tourism economy