Filter
The Sizewell C Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1 to 100 of 1290 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | View 50 results per page | 100

  • Binita Walia

    I am writing as a regular tourist to Suffolk and a member of the public who cares about our environment. I have grave concerns about the environmental impact of Sizewell C and from my in depth... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 July 2020

  • Christopher Yeo

    I wish to lodge my strong objection to the location of the lorry park in Felixstowe Road (the Seven Hills lorry park). Its proposed location will be danger to road users with slow moving large... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 July 2020

  • Dawn Lacey

    EDF - SIZEWELL C SUFFOLK IS AN OUTDATED COSTLY DESIGN - EDF HAVE FAILED TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUESTED IN CONSULTATIONS 1,2,3 AND 4. APPARANT TO ALL CONSULTEES, INC. COUNCILS, LOCAL HOMEOWNERS AND... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 July 2020

  • Jonathon Foster on behalf of Dr Daniel Poulter MP

    Dr Poulter has noted various concerns with the current proposals, including: • Extensive damage to Suffolk’s coastline and protected landscapes and habitats • Due to the change from sea-based to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 July 2020

  • Natural England (Natural England)

    As per your email dated the 8th July 2020 Natural England will provide relevant representation by the 30th September 2020. Please see attached

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 8 July 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Paul Sutton

    As a member of the engineering community involved with systems (electrical, electronic and programmable electronic systems) used for process control and safety I intend to provide meaningful... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 July 2020

  • David Costain

    The application is in the interests it the local comMunity and the country in general and should be approved

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Henrietta Palmer

    I wish to register that I protest against the proposed Sizewell C development . 1) Devestation to local environment 2) whatever attempts are made by EDFs to deal with the traffic it will nonetheless... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Lynda Whitbread

    I have concerns on all aspects of the plan to build a nuclear power station at Sizewell. The following bullet points are only a brief synopsis of my views. 1. We have concerns over the construction of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Martyn Bishop

    My wife and I [Redacted] and close to the proposed green rail link. As a result we intend to fully review and understand the details of the works and how the works will impact on our day to day lives.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Mr Jeffrey Paul Hallett

    Our village of Pettistree will be adversely affected by the development of Sizewell C especially during the construction phase. The plans submitted do not mitigate the problems we have identified,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Mrs Alexandra Adams

    I oppose the Sizewell C southern park and ride site at Wickham Market and believe it should be sited further south on the A12 away from residential areas and near the A14 for the following reasons: -... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Southwold and Reydon Society (Southwold and Reydon Society)

    We share the reservations and concerns of many local organisations. These have been lodged by the Society during the Consultation process. The Society is not convinced by the currently proposed... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Steven Teeder

    I can give a valued insite on the build at Hinckley point in respect of the greater good that has been achived fot the environment and wild life im a wild life photographer and nature lover and i can... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Stichting Greenpeace Nederland (Stichting Greenpeace Nederland)

    Stichting Greenpeace Nederland is an environmental NGO with seat in the Netherlands. It wants to focus on the following issues: - sufficiency of comparison with alternatives, including viable... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Suffolk Chamber of Commerce (Suffolk Chamber of Commerce)

    Suffolk Chamber supports the building of new nuclear to facilitate economic growth within Suffolk, boost job creation, investment and supply-chain benefits.... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 9 July 2020

  • Rosemary Martin

    No to park and ride at wickham market. Cut through traffic via Easton will be dreadful.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 July 2020

  • Brigitte Artmann

    Dear Madam and Sir. I'm the communicant of ACCC/C/2013/92 Germany. [Redacted] I wish to participate as a member of the public concerned under the Espoo Convention and under the Aarhus Convention. My... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 July 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Corporation of Trinity House (Corporation of Trinity House)

    Dear Sir / Madam We refer to the above application for development consent. Trinity House is the General Lighthouse Authority for England, Wales, the Channel Islands and Gibraltar with powers... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 13 July 2020

  • David Beavan

    I believe that this development would harm our economy and environment for no perceptable gain when nuclear energy costs so much more than offshore wind energy. The build period will severely impact... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 July 2020

  • John Cocker

    I am representing myself. I oppose the Sizewell C southern park and ride site at Wickham Market and believe it should be sited further south on the A12 away from residential areas and near the A14.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 July 2020

  • Bredfield Parish Council (Bredfield Parish Council )

    1. Traffic levels on southern part of A12: The A12 immediately to the North of Woodbridge is a single-carriageway road. Sizewell Stage 3 Consultation Document acknowledged that this part of the road... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 14 July 2020

  • Mark Solomons

    I live locally, on [Redacted] that is threatened by the construction of Sizewell. I am also a volunteer with the RSPB and a keen nature watcher. I believe the size of the project, the excavation of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 July 2020

  • Martin Bailie

    The proposed southern park and ride for the construction of Sizewell C is just off the A12 at Wickham Market. I think this is a totally inappropriate site. This is a vast site; 1250 cars is a huge... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 July 2020

  • British Telecommunications plc (British Telecommunications plc)

    I represent British Telecom and their property department. I wish to be kept informed of any updates on the planning for Sizewell C so as to ensure any BT property interests are protected.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 July 2020

  • Jane Haviland Webster

    The argument against using a sea delivery facility is extremely weak and unjustified, in my opinion. The impact Of the development on the road network will be irrevocable and have an adverse impact on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 July 2020

  • Mill Hill Farm Caravan & campsite (Mill Hill Farm Caravan & campsite)

    I own and manage a caravan and camping park at Mill Hill Farm , Darsham. The Northern Park and Ride proposal is less than two miles from our site. I am concerned about noise, traffic , light pollution... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 July 2020

  • Richard Marston

    Dear Sirs Living on the side to the A12 at the top of[Redacted] the traffic flow is already at absolutely maximum levels. To add another 100 bus movements and many 1,000s of additional car movements... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 July 2020

  • Royal Yachting Association (Royal Yachting Association )

    RYA (Royal Yachting Association) desires to be involved in this application on behalf of leisure boating interests in the area --------------------------- RYA thinks there will be no affects on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 July 2020

  • Saxmundham Town Council (Saxmundham Town Council)

    Saxmundham Town Council's position on the development of the Sizewell C Nuclear Power Saxmundham Town Council notes that EDF submitted application for the Sizewell C nuclear power plant for planning... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 16 July 2020

  • Graham K. Lacey

    My Wife & I our key stakeholders in respect of EDF's proposed development at Sizewell C. Many issues raised by ourselves at Stage 4 pre-submission of the DCO remain inadequately answered. We have... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2020

  • Robin Leonard Sanders

    As a retired chartered geotechnical engineering and geological expert I shall be examining the documentation to determine if sound geotechnical and geological principles have been applied in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Alan Hatt

    Traffic/ I am a Theberton resident living adjacent B1122. I reject EDF's road led strategy. The link road cuts of Pretty road a vital link to Saxmundham,s Tesco and Waitrose. Villages access to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2020

  • Kendrick Barry Denison

    i am worried about the disruption that this will cause ( based on the pervious 2 projects )to the community's and business in the surrounding areas any compensation has been to little and to late and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2020

  • Marine Management Organisation (Marine Management Organisation)

    Good morning, Due to the word limit in this section, the Marine Management Organisation will submit our relevant representation via email to sizewellc@planninginspectorate.gov.uk on 29 September 2020.... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 20 July 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Office for Nuclear Regulation (Office for Nuclear Regulation)

    Office for Nuclear Regulation The Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) is the principal regulator of the safety and civil nuclear security of the UK nuclear industry, and licenses and regulates a broad... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 21 July 2020

  • Danish Emergency Management Agency (Danish Emergency Management Agency)

    I want to gain sufficioent insigth into the safety systems of the power plants to be able to comment on them --------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear Sirs My main... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 22 July 2020

  • Georgina Paske

    My interest in the captioned project relates to Beveriche Manor Farm IP17 3LJ that my farming enterprise owns and farms Commercially. Within the proposed plans there is a desire to purchase some of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 July 2020

  • Robert Brock

    I have serious concerns about whether the views of local residents have been properly considered in the consultation and preliminary processes in respect of the proposed power stations and associated... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 July 2020

  • Jo Hannon

    I am extremely concerned about the impact that Sizewell C will have upon the local environment. Both in respect of the immediate construction area and the wider locality. Many hectares of treasured... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 July 2020

  • Tim Hannon

    Concerns over traffic management, social and environmental impact during and post construction, long term impact on the local economy

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 July 2020

  • Clive Tickner

    1) POOR RECORD. EDF's record with EPR reactors is dreadful. Finland and France, are still both facing costly construction delays. Flamanville, is 7 years behind schedule, still not online, and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 July 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Ian Collins

    My submission will be that it is unwise to extend a nuclear power station on an increasingly eroding coastline. It will bring added blight to an area of outstanding natural beauty with a network of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 July 2020

  • Lindsay Dann

    Projected traffic volumes on roads within a 25 mile radius during construction will seriously impact on the road infrastructure and unreasonably affect the quality of life of an unacceptable number of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 July 2020

  • Ruth Walker

    As a resident of East Suffolk, I am writing to express my views on the EDF planning proposals for Sizewell C. The effect on this wonderful area of “Outstanding Natural Beauty” it’s wildlife as well as... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 July 2020

  • Andrew Hunter

    I propose, once I have fully digested the contents of the applicant's Environmental Statements to make comments on the following matters: - Temporary rail infrastructure - Temporary park and ride... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 July 2020

  • East Suffolk Council (East Suffolk Council) on behalf of Green, Lib Democrat & Independent (GLI)Grp East Suffolk Council (Green, Lib Democrat & Independent (GLI)Grp East Suffolk Council)

    The Members of the GLI Group as individual Ward Members believe that; Use of Nuclear Power • Nuclear Power should not be supported as a primary source of energy in the UK because it is; o Outdated,... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 28 July 2020

  • Andrea Roehm

    I'm deeply concerned about the building of a third nuclear power station in Sizewell. To my mind, nuclear power is not at all environmentally friendly and poses a number of serious health hazards. In... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 August 2020

  • Elliot Chart

    I'd prefer a renewable solution to a nuclear one. Furthermore I oppose Sizewell C.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 August 2020

  • Nucléaire Stop Kernenergie (Nucléaire Stop Kernenergie)

    * The EPR nuclear power plants are a new kind of NPP's that already encounter numerous important technical problems. *The financial structure of EDF is a well known problem. EDF might be tempted to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 August 2020

  • Belgian State (Belgian State)

    Belgium candidates to be considered as an ‘interested party’, for the following reasons: - In emergency situations, in case of atmospheric – and to a lesser extent also liquid – discharges, an impact... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 August 2020

  • Belinda Agar

    I write to object to the planning application which will destroy the area of outstanding natural Beauty in which we live due to the amount of traffic congestion and people and buildings involved which... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 August 2020

  • David Hoult

    I want to protest in the strongest possible terms about the location of the proposed lorry interchange on the old A45 At Levington. The Planning Inspectorate recently rejected an application for a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 August 2020

  • Sarah Gorry

    I do not believe the Sizewell C project should go ahead for the following reasons: 1) unacceptable levels of traffic congestion and pollution for 10-12 years 2) link road has no long-term use, and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 August 2020

  • Sharron Jarvis

    I work locally as a [Redacted] seeing may people who live in the area and feel a great sense of peace by seeing the countryside, wildlife and the sea. If the proposed building of Sizewell C takes... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 August 2020

  • Peter Palmer

    Although an Aldeburgh Town Councillor this registration is my own personal contribution and should not be taken as representing the views of the Town Council. The consultation process has been long,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 August 2020

  • Garry Booth

    This project is a short and long term blight on the local environment and the technology is questionable, even risky. The jobs benefit to local people will be offset by the degradation of the coast... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 August 2020

  • Ian Cliff

    I am a regular visitor to East Suffolk where I was brought up. I am a member of the East Suffolk Travel Association, although I am not presenting the views of that organisation in this Representation.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 August 2020

  • Jackie Catterwell

    I live facing the Woodbridge to Sizewell rail track. I object vehemently to trains coming past this residential area throughout the night. I was here the last time it happened and the intense... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 August 2020

  • Pettistree Parish Council (Pettistree Parish Council)

    Our village of Pettistree will be adversely affected by the development of Sizewell C especially during the construction phase. The plans submitted do not mitigate the problems we have identified,... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 5 August 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Carla Hall

    My name is Carla hall I live at [Redacted] We have lived here two years and enjoy the remote peaceful location. I live [Redacted] away from Location: Bratts Black No1, grid ref:TM 399 639. I looked... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 August 2020

  • Terence Jeffrey

    I put it the examine body that the Sizewell C proposals will if allowed have an adverse impact on the holiday and visitor numbers which will result in a economic collapse costing the local economy far... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 August 2020

  • Malcolm Rowe

    The issue is the use of heavy goods trains at night from 11pm to 6am every night for up to ten years, hundreds of people are living along side this track some within 20ft, the resulting sleep... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 August 2020

  • UK & Ireland Nuclear Free Local Authorities (NFLA) (UK & Ireland Nuclear Free Local Authorities (NFLA))

    NFLA has made detailed comments in all four rounds of local consultation by EDF Energy on Sizewell C (see our website [Redacted]. We would be concentrating our comments on the following: - The... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 10 August 2020

  • Whitearch Residential Park (Whitearch Residential Park)

    We have concerns about the use of heavy goods trains being used to transport materials to Sizewell C at night from eleven pm to six am every night over a period of time lasting up to ten years, we... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 August 2020

  • Jonathan Rutherford

    I am against the Sizewell C proposals. I am convinced that the way forward is with Green Energies: Solar, Wind and Tidal. It is important to think ahead and not make a massive blunder. It is not a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 August 2020

  • The Wilford Family

    We live on the A1120 which is already inundated with traffic and are concerned about the environmental impact on Peasenhall village and more importantly the mental well-being of its residents combined... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 August 2020

  • Christopher Lewis

    The consultation process The size of the site Environmental damage The future prospects of Sizewell C The future damage to the area's prospects

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 August 2020

  • Fiona Hay

    I wish to voice my concerns about the above project. I am astounded at the estimated number of lorries and buses this project will demand and bring onto quiet, local roads. I believe this traffic is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 August 2020

  • Guy Renn

    I urge you to support the planning application for the Sizewell C project in order that Suffolk benefits from the investment and long-term employment that it will bring. Regrettably, well-paid, secure... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 August 2020

  • Julian Michael Cusack

    I wish to object to the siting of a new nuclear power station at the proposed site of Sizewell C. The primary grounds of my objection are environmental, incljuding damage to important wildlife habitat... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 August 2020

  • Nick Scarr

    I wish to raise concerns about the following issues within NNB Generation Company (SZC) Limited Development Consent Order Application: * NNB's flood risk assessments and modelling for the main nuclear... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 August 2020

  • Malcolm Watson

    I am concerned about the economic and environmental feasibility of the Sizewell C project. In economic terms I am aware of reports about the precarious financial situation of EDF and the issues it is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 August 2020

  • Alice Bull

    There is no evidence that Sizewell C will aid the UK's economic recovery: a third of construction value and up to half of investment revenue is predicted to leave the UK. Large infrastructure projects... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 August 2020

  • Richard Hare

    I grew up with Sizewell 'A' visible from my Southwold schoolroom in the early '60 and I accepted 'B'. I reject 'C' as there are so many better, cheaper alternatives. Sizewell 'C' is immensely... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 August 2020

  • Susan Marling

    I should like to strongly object to the Sizewell C project for a number of reasons: 1. The scale, disruption and length of time involved in building Sizewell C will greatly harm the local area which... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 August 2020

  • Peter Glen

    I intend to submit that the building of Sizewell C is not in the interest of the UK for the following reasons: Its detrimental impact on the environment Its high cost to build and run and the high... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 August 2020

  • Adam Cobbold

    Dear Madame, Sirs, I am writing to try to persuade you not to build Sizewell C. There are multiple reasons why i feel this way. Firstly, but not so importantly, the country road (A1120) I live on will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 August 2020

  • County Councillor Christopher G Hudson

    Dear Inspectorate, For the following reasons,I submit my Representation: Vast increase in HGV’s and other vehicles on roads that are inadequate through rural and green belt areas,causing gridlock and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 August 2020

  • Denise Johnson

    1. • The worst scenario from a nuclear reactor accident would be multiple deaths, injuries and environmental degradation. Spent nuclear fuel storage creates terrorism risks. No project is worth those... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 August 2020

  • Erica Rae

    As a resident of Yoxford in Suffolk, and in response to EDF’s planning submission for Sizewell C, I would like to register my opposition to the scheme. Nuclear strategy, cost and renewables: The UK... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 August 2020

  • Fay Sweet

    Building Sizewell C will cause more harm than good.. please try solar or water power instead.. for the sake of us and future generations. Continuing with Sizewell C is a big mistake in so many ways.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 August 2020

  • Sarah Osborne

    as a local resident I am fully supportive of the project and the long term benefits that it will bring to the young people in the area. Offering long term, stable employment in an industry that has... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 August 2020

  • Molly Irene Elmy

    I understand that the country needs more energy generation provision, and take a pragmatic approach to these needs. Yes i would prefer the nuclear power station to go some where else, but it has got... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 August 2020

  • Stephanie Williams

    1/ The UK does not need additional power infrastructure from developments such as Sizewell C - not only is the risk of the proposal outlined here [Redacted] there is evidence that the project is more... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 August 2020

  • Derek V H Downer

    As per my previous correspondence, fully explains my objections to this project being carried out by the Chinese. As stated I lived in East Africa during the period of the railway being built between... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 August 2020

  • Marie Curtin

    I live on the B1122 in Yoxford on the section of the road that has been identified by EDF as suffering from an impact of the development. I quote from EDF's documentation:- 'It is also recognised that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 August 2020

  • Martial Pardoen

    I am interested by the protection of environment, biodiversity, well-being,...

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 August 2020

  • Mrs Pat Dorcey

    My main concern is the fact that huge amounts of radioactive material will be stored in the location amounting to a dangerous and vulnerable area . A terrible legacy to leave for he future .... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 August 2020

  • Michael Olding

    I guess that I am one of those classified as the "silent majority", not one for normally writing to express my views, but I think the time has come to put "pen to paper" as it were. I am writing to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 August 2020

  • Edith Summerhayes

    As a local resident who has known and loved Suffolk most of my life, I consider it a destructive and short-sighted plan to massively extend Sizewell nuclear site in the face of climate crisis. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 August 2020

  • Clive Lovelock

    EDF's most recent proposals see an increased role for rail transport for bringing materials to site for the project which is welcome, however the lack of detail in these proposals for the rail options... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 August 2020

  • English Heritage Trust (English Heritage Trust)

    English Heritage Trust (EHT) was formed in 2015 as a registered charitable company, independent of government – effectively English Heritage at that time was split into Historic England and EHT. We... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 24 August 2020

  • Christina Campbell

    My main objection is that this technology is now outdated. Recent development in sustainable energy sources render nuclear power now longer fit for purpose. To pursue this would be total folly. I am... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 August 2020

  • James Osborne

    Traffic and pollution effects of the Southern Park and Ride plans on the immediate environment and on the wider countryside. The proposed scheme will attract traffic into a small concentrated area... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 August 2020

  • Anthony Franklin

    I am fully supportive of the plan to build Sizewell C

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 August 2020

  • Anthony Martin

    I am in support of the plan to build Sizewell C. Sizewell B has been operating safely and efficiently for 25 years. It has played a vital role in providing carbon-free electricity. Nuclear power has... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 August 2020

  • Graham Ford

    Building a large nuclear power station on sand, on a rapidly eroding coastline with rising sea levels is clearly extremely dangerous, and should not be allowed, for the sake of present and future... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 August 2020

  • Mrs P Jenkinson

    I seriously question the need for any further nuclear power stations at a time when this country is committed to becoming carbon neutral and there is no sensible framework for dealing with nuclear... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 August 2020

  • Jacky Carpenter

    The Sizewell C project lacks a realistic emissions lag in terms of offsetting greenhouse emissions generated in its construction. EDF estimate that 6 million tonnes of carbon dioxide will be emitted... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 27 August 2020