Filter
East Anglia TWO Offshore Windfarm

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1 to 50 of 833 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Olivia Brown

    Scottish Power Renewables have not undertaken sufficient objective research for their application in respect of the following 1. Locating all supporting infrastructure 'offshore' to prevent the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2019

  • Robert Browne

    Dear Sir's My interest in these projects is in the fact that I live very close to the proposed development area. According to drawings I have seen this would be not more than 20 meters. My primary... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2019

  • David Horton

    The proposed site of the power station abuts the village of Friston where I live. It will destroy the character of the whole area and it cuts right across the ancient public right of way where we take... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 November 2019

  • Karen Mountford

    I understand that we will be having a large number of heavily laden lorries using the B1122. I walk along part of this road and back twice a day. THERE IS NO FOOTWAY AND AS I AM (Redacted) I CANNOT... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 November 2019

  • Michael Barnard

    Impact of the development on visual and ecological issues

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 December 2019

  • Theresa Tollemache

    There must be a review of a more sustainable strategy for on shore connection from the off shore Wind Turbines off the east anglian coast and indeed any coastal sites. The environmental disruption of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 December 2019

  • Martin Cotter

    My property is a listed building and sighted a few hundred metres north of the proposed infrastructure locations. This area of Suffolk is still one of the few unspoilt idylls left in our... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 December 2019

  • Suffolk Coast & Heaths Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB (Suffolk Coast & Heaths Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)

    I should like to make a representation on behalf of the Suffolk Coast & Heaths Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) Partnership. The Partnership is made up of around 25 organisations who are... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 3 December 2019

  • Tony Morley

    SPR received permission go use the new Bawdsey to Bramford cable route and SPR should be instructed to use that facility instead of destroying a large area of Suffolk. The Consultation process has... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 December 2019

  • Trudy Klauber

    I want to ask how many lorries will use the Leiston Road between Aldeburgh and Leiston because the road is narrow and not sufficiently strong, and the traffic will be a considerable hazard for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 December 2019

  • Emma Steadman

    My property backs directly onto the site proposed for the project cutting off footpaths I use every day with my dogs. My safety and that of numerous other vulnerable and elderly dog walkers in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 December 2019

  • NATS (NATS)

    NATS has assessed the proposal and anticipates an impact on its infrastructure; specifically that the turbines will be detected by NATS’s Cromer radar. It is anticipated that the radar detection of... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 5 December 2019

  • Norfolk Independent Fisherman Association (Norfolk Independent Fisherman Association)

    We, the Norfolk Independent Fisherman Association, object to this application on the grounds that a number of our members will be financially at a loss and it will interrupt our fishing operations. We... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 5 December 2019

  • Pat Dorcey

    I would like to register my interest as since Nov2017 my life has bee in turmoil. Firstly to stumble across a project of this magnitude whilst attending a parish council meeting on a simple planning... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 December 2019

  • Whale and Dolphin Conservation (Whale and Dolphin Conservation)

    The North Sea offers a variety of rich cetacean habitats. Whilst gaps still remain in our knowledge of the cetaceans which live year round or migrate through our waters, East Anglia TWO offshore wind... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 6 December 2019

  • Michael Jones

    The area of Suffolk coastal and Friston in particular is totally unsuitable for this proposal being in attractive rural countryside which is a major tourist area. The site proposed next to Friston... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 December 2019

  • Philip Lines

    I have consistently argued that it is not in anyone's best interest to locate the onshore elements of this scheme several miles inland. Not only will this cause a significant blight in a rural area of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 December 2019

  • Jan Packard

    Siting of proposed substation at Friston to accommodate EA2 and EA1N wind farms will have a devasting effect on people’s lives, and countryside in Suffolk Large areas of AONB will be destroyed and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 December 2019

  • Mark Haines

    I live 3 miles inland from Thorpeness/Sizewell and will be directly affected by the idea of bringing windfarm electricity a few miles inland before joining it to the grid. I don't think we have to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 December 2019

  • Rosie Norton

    My chief concern involving this application is the detrimental effect it will have on a beautiful part of Suffolk which is enjoyed by residents and visitors alike, This area is of major importance to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 December 2019

  • Suffolk County Council (Suffolk County Council)

    Representation to be submitted separately due to length of representation as discussed.

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 9 December 2019
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Office for Nuclear Regulation (Office for Nuclear Regulation)

    ONR has a role as a statutory consultee for National Policy Statements (NPS) and Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs) likely to affect matters relevant to ONR’s purposes, as... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 10 December 2019

  • Harwich Harbour Fishermen's Association (Harwich Harbour Fishermen's Association)

    The Harwich Fisherman’s Association (Redacted) 11th December 2019 PROPOSED EAST ANGLIA TWO OFFSHORE WINDFARM OBJECTION As a member representing the 17 vessels of Harwich Fisherman's Association on the... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 11 December 2019

  • Christine Gray

    I want to express my concerns about the potential damage to the rural environment in East Suffolk, an AONB. I also want to express my views on alternative options which may be more appropriate.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2019

  • Southwold Town Council (Southwold Town Council)

    The reason for registering is to follow and support Natural England's concerns about the proposed developments. Southwold Town Council is supportive of the environmental advantages of renewable power... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 12 December 2019

  • Nick Scarr

    No decisions should be made on substation plans or approvals until there is clarity on Sizewell C's proposed development.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 December 2019

  • R T Rainger

    My objection is not with respect to Renewables, but primarily around the selection and suitability of Friston as the location for the on shore Sub-Station development for EA1N and EA2. The resultant... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 December 2019

  • Aldeburgh Town Council (Aldeburgh Town Council)

    ATC believes the proposal by SPR to utilise roads in Aldeburgh for HGV movements would have a serious impact on the lives of residents and visitors and would have a major detrimental effect on the... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 23 December 2019

  • Carole Morley

    This proposed development would completely destroy the village of Friston, it would tower over the village, the noise would affect all residents, the current flooding problem would be hugely increased... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 December 2019

  • Simon Flunder

    I am a resident of Southwold and I am concerned about the visual effect of the Wind farms on the seascape from the top of Gun Hill.Southwold and the immediate area has benefitted from a clear horizon... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 December 2019

  • Simon Elwell

    I am a sailor based out of Harwich harbour, frequently sailing through the area of the new windfarms. Sailing vessels are not fast (we plan passages at 6.5knots but can frequently be slower if winds... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 December 2019

  • Sarah Courage

    I strongly object to this application because of the massive industrialisation that will desecrate this beautiful, unspoilt area of East Suffolk. No account has been taken of the cumulative impact on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 December 2019

  • Corporation of Trinity House (Corporation of Trinity House )

    Dear Sir / Madam We refer to the above application for development consent in respect of East Anglia TWO Offshore Wind Farm. Trinity House is the General Lighthouse Authority for England, Wales, the... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 3 January 2020

  • Mary E Gwynne

    It is impossible to believe that your proposition to destroy the beautiful area of Suffolk that has the lovely village of Friston in it, is actually a viable idea. Where on earth did this completely... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 January 2020

  • Ms L Leeder

    I object to the application, due to the detrimental impact the substation proposed for Friston and its related infrastructure will have on the Suffolk Coast & Heaths AONB and adjacent countryside as a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 January 2020

  • Barry Smith

    I strongly disagree with the plans to build a substation on prime farmland in Friston based impact on the negative impact on the people living in and near the village and cable route, severe impact on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 January 2020

  • Christopher Lewis

    I support the representations already made by SASES and by Friston Parish Council. The danger is that Britain’s reputation for being a leader in renewable offshore energy is about to be ruined by the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 January 2020

  • Donald Biggs

    Impact on Our Community and Legacy of Scottish Power Friston Project We need sustainable energy and windfarms provide a valuable contribution to our need for power and hopefully will for generations... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 January 2020

  • Emma Smith

    I strongly disagree with the plans to build a substation on prime farmland in Friston based impact on people living in and near the village and cable route, severe impact on landscape, wildlife and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 January 2020

  • Michael Trapp

    I wish to make comments as set out below with regard to the planning application:- 1. As a result of the recent general election and the delay of the scheme for North Norfolk the whole planning... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 January 2020

  • Vivienne Saunders

    I am an independent who objects to SPR plans to carve a 7km cable route from Thorpeness to Friston, and to destroy the Woodland in Friston with an unsightly Substation. The fragile coastline in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 January 2020

  • William Averdieck

    I object to the planning application Destruction and damage to the AONB North of Thorpeness is unjustified when alternative landfall routes are available closer to Sizewell power station inadequate... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 January 2020

  • Debbie Klussmann

    I am deeply concerned about current plans for renewable energy in our region on greenfield sites. I want developements to take place on brownfield sites only.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 January 2020

  • Martin Steadman

    I wholly support the representations being made by both Fristin PC and SASES. I moved to Friston with my wife in September 2015. It was to be our final move as we wanted to retire to this part of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 January 2020

  • Mrs B Strowger

    I OBJECT TO THIS AS I HAVE LIVESTOCK I HAVE TO GET TO ALONG THIS TRACK AT SIZEWELL WHICH I HAVE TO FEED AND WATER. I HOPE I AM NOT GOING TO BE PREVENTED IN GETTING TO THEM ALONG THIS TRACK AS HEAVY... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 January 2020

  • Nichola Winter

    The proposed development of a substation relating to this project on the edge of Friston is completely inappropriate in terms of scale, safety for the local community, environmental consideration,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 January 2020

  • Jacob Abel

    The following points will only consider the onshore and coastal impacts. They are simplified and not put into specific categories, with the intention that the full developed points can be submitted at... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 January 2020

  • Mary Shipman

    Firstly we support the views expressed by Friston Parish Council together with Substation Action|Save East Suffolk. Our specific concerns are as follows:- 1. The cumulative impact of all the energy... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 January 2020

  • Alan Bullard

    I wish to register my support of all representations made by SASES (Substation Action Save East Suffolk) and by Friston Parish Council, regarding these proposals. I live in the village of Friston, and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2020

  • David Gordon

    First, the Energy Minister is to launch a review into the impact windfarms have onshore. Until this review is completed I would submit that it is premature and prejudicial for you to consider the SP... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 January 2020