Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
AQUIND Interconnector

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 51 to 100 of 211 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Milton Neighbourhood Planning Forum (Milton Neighbourhood Planning Forum)

    The proposed route in Portsmouth is unnecessary and creates a public nuisance. An alternative and viable route using the former Hayling Island Railway link to Havant and on to Lovedean is available... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Natural England (Natural England )

    Dear Sirs, Natural England is the statutory adviser to government on nature conservation in England and promotes the conservation of England's wildlife and natural features. We wish to be registered... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Dentons UK and Middle East LLP (Dentons UK and Middle East LLP) on behalf of Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail Infrastructure Limited )

    Network Rail Infrastructure Limited ("Network Rail") is a statutory undertaker and owns, operates and maintains the majority of the rail infrastructure of Great Britain. The Book of Reference... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Nick Bertenshaw

    I object to this planning proposal, and I am extremely concerned that the local council was given no say in this.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Peter Hicks

    I wish to register my objection to the AQUIND Interconnector project because of the adverse effect it will have on Eastney foreshore and the wildlife of shore and adjacent marsh land, Milton common... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Portsmouth City Council (Portsmouth City Council)

    Relevant Representation of Portsmouth City Council in relation to the Application for a Development Consent Order made by Aquind Limited in respect of a proposed development - Aquind Interconnector... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Rachel Dawson

    I am very much objecting to the Aquind interconnector. i am a local resident and strongly feel. this information has not been shared with me as a local resident. I know nothing about it...I also... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Rosemary Sirett

    I wish to object to the Aquind Interconnector plans to come ashore in Portsmouth and its route through Portsmouth. I understand it will not only involve digging up valuable parking space and cutting... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Ruth Taylor

    I object to this plan as its installation will be so disruptive to the City and environs. I query its value to us when there is headway and opportunity to create energy from natural sources.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Sally Englefield

    This will disrupt the whole city and destroy the small amount of green space that we have.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Shelagh Simmons

    We wish to object to this application for the following reasons. There has been a complete lack of information over the last 2 years which has meant that the proposed route of the cable was not made... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Simon Bosher

    I am registering my objection to the proposed route. I am a City Councillor representing Drayton and Farlington. The consultation approach adopted by Aquind has been worrying to residents who’ve had... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Marta Karpezo on behalf of Southern Water Services Ltd (Southern Water Services Ltd)

    SWS is the statutory sewerage undertaker for the area of the proposed development. SWS has apparatus and interests in land which is the subject of the proposed application. Me may provide a... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Terence Garnett

    Concerned as there will be impact on roads, the area and possibly my property.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Ian Judd and Partners (Ian Judd and Partners) on behalf of The Landowners of land at [] (The Landowners of land at [])

    This Relevant Representation is submitted on behalf of the Owners of Land at [], being Julie Elliott, Robin Elliott, Richard Elliott and Phillip Elliott who wish to be registered as an organisation... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Ian Judd and Partners (Ian Judd and Partners) on behalf of The Owners of Land at [] Joseph Tee, Kathryn Moor (The Owners of Land at [] Joseph Tee, Kathryn Moor)

    This Relevant Representation is submitted on behalf of the Owners of Land at [], Joseph Tee, Kathryn Moore & John Moore, who wish to be registered as an organisation Interested Party for the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Timothy Brown

    I am concerned about the disruption to traffic on the Eastern Road.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Viola Langley

    I object to these plans as I am aware of possible health risks and the disruption for the local community.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Winchester City Council (Winchester City Council)

    Winchester City Council Relevant Representation Aquind Interconnector Planning Inspectorate Reference: EN020022 Summary of main aspects: The main site for the Converter Station, part of the access... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Allison Udy

    Portsmouth is already congested with traffic problems and heavily populated, in fact I understand it to be the most populated city outside of London. Conbined with the fact that we're an island, it's... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Ann Farrelly

    I wish to object to the Aquind Interconnector and will be submitting a more detailed written representation. My main points will include the chaos its work will cause to Portsmouth

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Annette Sartori

    I live on [Redacted]. To the back there is a small nature reserve. Ripping into this will be devastating to the people and wildlife that live here. Further down ripping into a close community narrow... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Charlotte Smith

    Residents feel distrust and anger towards the application that has been put forward. The complete lack of information over the last 2 years has meant that we have not known what the proposed route of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Charlotte Wright

    Residents feel distrust and anger towards the application that has been put forward. The complete lack of information over the last 2 years has meant that we have not known what the proposed route of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Christopher Jones

    That the route will cause unnecessary disruption That the impact on wildlife will be irreparable That the destruction of habitats is unnecessary That there are better and less disruptive options

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Clare Ash

    The proposed project is not wanted by the people or City of Portsmouth. It will cause major disruption to a major artery, the Eastern Road, one of only three routes into the city. Portsmouth is an... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Dan Brookes

    This will cause major traffic issue and effect local wildlife

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Danielle Preston

    Residents feel distrust and anger towards the application that has been put forward. The complete lack of information over the last 2 years has meant that we have not known what the proposed route of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • David Jordan

    It makes no sense to land the supply in the southern end of Portsea Island. It only makes sense to land it at the northern end of Langstone harbour.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Dawn Gilbert

    Outline for representation Route a) potential gridlock in and out of Portsmouth b) request rationale for proposed route to previous submission and location of interconnector The % of the UK country... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Deborah Cutler

    There is no need to import energy from another country, alternatives such as wind power should be investigated. Much damage will be done to the local wildlife and environment. Landfall could be at the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Debra Wallace

    Portsmouth is the most highly populated island city in Britain. This means that the digging up of one of the 3 roads in and out of the city will cause major disruption. There are many less populated... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Diane Roberts

    Residents feel distrust and anger towards the application that has been put forward. The complete lack of information over the last 2 years has meant that we have not known what the proposed route of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Ed Waller

    The UK has little difficulty in generating sufficient energy for its needs. Further until the UK government has fully investigated renewable energy within the UK, developing market opportunities that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Elizabeth Doyle

    The intention by Aquind to lay this cable in the route outlined will cause unacceptable disruption to many Portsmouth residents, allotment owners, dog walkers as well as causing irreparable damage to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • First Hampshire Dorset and Berkshire (First Hampshire Dorset and Berkshire )

    I think there are valid points to raise in line with the economic growth and the potential to affect our revenue growth throughout what will be months of disruption. Whilst We fully accept that this... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Georgina Butt

    Objections to Aquind plan to place interconnector at Eastney and run through Milton, Baffins and along the Eastern Rd.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Gp Capt S A Hickey OBE

    I object most strongly to the proposal. Digging up roads and communities when Langstone Harbour is available is wrong

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Graham O’Neil

    I am shortly going to be moving into Meon Rd. Public consultation for this project has been extremely poor. There are questions over the access to information via the USB sticks that were all were not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Hampshire County Council (Hampshire County Council)

    This is a single representation from Hampshire County Council (the Council) which summarises the current position of the Authority. The response progresses discussions which have taken place to date... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Havant Borough Council (Havant Borough Council)

    Following the Planning Inspectorate’s acceptance of an application for a Development Consent Order (DCO) for Aquind Interconnector, Havant Borough Council (HBC) is a host Borough requests to be... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Helen Shortall

    I wish to object to the Aquind Interconnector for various reasons and have a written objection to submit. Residents feel distrust and anger towards the application that has been put forward. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Highways England (Highways England)

    Dear Sir/Madam Highways England wishes to register as an interested party in respect of the application by Aquind Limited for an Order Granting Development Consent for the Aquind Interconnector.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Ian Daye

    I object to the Aquind application and will submit a full written objection at the relevant time. I am a resident living in the effected area of this application. My main but not whole objections at... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Stantec (Stantec) on behalf of Investin Portsmouth Ltd (Investin Portsmouth Ltd)

    We have reviewed the information provided in relation to the Aquind Interconnector Proposal (Planning Inspectorate Reference EN020022). At this time, we propose that a HOLDING OBJECTION is made until... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • James Baker

    I am against this proposal on the grounds of the pollution , the upheaval, and destruction of the last green area in Portsmouth..

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Jim Roberts

    Residents feel distrust and anger towards the application that has been put forward. The complete lack of information over the last 2 years has meant that we have not known what the proposed route of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Katrina Corby

    Residents feel distrust and anger towards the application that has been put forward. The complete lack of information over the last 2 years has meant that we have not known what the proposed route of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Keith Baker

    This development will cause untold nuisance for residents especially regard to traffic on one of the busiest roads in one of the UK's most densely populated cities. I can see no benefit to local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Keith Dean

    Why should we allow this power line to run through our city and have no say or recompense over it?

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020