Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
AQUIND Interconnector

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 51 to 75 of 211 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Milton Neighbourhood Planning Forum (Milton Neighbourhood Planning Forum)

    The proposed route in Portsmouth is unnecessary and creates a public nuisance. An alternative and viable route using the former Hayling Island Railway link to Havant and on to Lovedean is available... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Natural England (Natural England )

    Dear Sirs, Natural England is the statutory adviser to government on nature conservation in England and promotes the conservation of England's wildlife and natural features. We wish to be registered... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Dentons UK and Middle East LLP (Dentons UK and Middle East LLP) on behalf of Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail Infrastructure Limited )

    Network Rail Infrastructure Limited ("Network Rail") is a statutory undertaker and owns, operates and maintains the majority of the rail infrastructure of Great Britain. The Book of Reference... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Nick Bertenshaw

    I object to this planning proposal, and I am extremely concerned that the local council was given no say in this.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Peter Hicks

    I wish to register my objection to the AQUIND Interconnector project because of the adverse effect it will have on Eastney foreshore and the wildlife of shore and adjacent marsh land, Milton common... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Portsmouth City Council (Portsmouth City Council)

    Relevant Representation of Portsmouth City Council in relation to the Application for a Development Consent Order made by Aquind Limited in respect of a proposed development - Aquind Interconnector... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Rachel Dawson

    I am very much objecting to the Aquind interconnector. i am a local resident and strongly feel. this information has not been shared with me as a local resident. I know nothing about it...I also... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Rosemary Sirett

    I wish to object to the Aquind Interconnector plans to come ashore in Portsmouth and its route through Portsmouth. I understand it will not only involve digging up valuable parking space and cutting... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Ruth Taylor

    I object to this plan as its installation will be so disruptive to the City and environs. I query its value to us when there is headway and opportunity to create energy from natural sources.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Sally Englefield

    This will disrupt the whole city and destroy the small amount of green space that we have.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Shelagh Simmons

    We wish to object to this application for the following reasons. There has been a complete lack of information over the last 2 years which has meant that the proposed route of the cable was not made... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Simon Bosher

    I am registering my objection to the proposed route. I am a City Councillor representing Drayton and Farlington. The consultation approach adopted by Aquind has been worrying to residents who’ve had... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Marta Karpezo on behalf of Southern Water Services Ltd (Southern Water Services Ltd)

    SWS is the statutory sewerage undertaker for the area of the proposed development. SWS has apparatus and interests in land which is the subject of the proposed application. Me may provide a... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Terence Garnett

    Concerned as there will be impact on roads, the area and possibly my property.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Ian Judd and Partners (Ian Judd and Partners) on behalf of The Landowners of land at [] (The Landowners of land at [])

    This Relevant Representation is submitted on behalf of the Owners of Land at [], being Julie Elliott, Robin Elliott, Richard Elliott and Phillip Elliott who wish to be registered as an organisation... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Ian Judd and Partners (Ian Judd and Partners) on behalf of The Owners of Land at [] Joseph Tee, Kathryn Moor (The Owners of Land at [] Joseph Tee, Kathryn Moor)

    This Relevant Representation is submitted on behalf of the Owners of Land at [], Joseph Tee, Kathryn Moore & John Moore, who wish to be registered as an organisation Interested Party for the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Timothy Brown

    I am concerned about the disruption to traffic on the Eastern Road.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Viola Langley

    I object to these plans as I am aware of possible health risks and the disruption for the local community.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Winchester City Council (Winchester City Council)

    Winchester City Council Relevant Representation Aquind Interconnector Planning Inspectorate Reference: EN020022 Summary of main aspects: The main site for the Converter Station, part of the access... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 19 February 2020

  • Allison Udy

    Portsmouth is already congested with traffic problems and heavily populated, in fact I understand it to be the most populated city outside of London. Conbined with the fact that we're an island, it's... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Ann Farrelly

    I wish to object to the Aquind Interconnector and will be submitting a more detailed written representation. My main points will include the chaos its work will cause to Portsmouth

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Annette Sartori

    I live on [Redacted]. To the back there is a small nature reserve. Ripping into this will be devastating to the people and wildlife that live here. Further down ripping into a close community narrow... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Charlotte Smith

    Residents feel distrust and anger towards the application that has been put forward. The complete lack of information over the last 2 years has meant that we have not known what the proposed route of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Charlotte Wright

    Residents feel distrust and anger towards the application that has been put forward. The complete lack of information over the last 2 years has meant that we have not known what the proposed route of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020

  • Christopher Jones

    That the route will cause unnecessary disruption That the impact on wildlife will be irreparable That the destruction of habitats is unnecessary That there are better and less disruptive options

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 February 2020