Willington C Gas Pipeline

Section 51 advice

The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.

There is a statutory duty, under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008, around an application or potential application. This includes recording the name of the person who requested advice and the advice given. This information has to be made publicly available.

Search advice

Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.

Showing 26 to 49 of 49 documents, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • View advice to npower

    Is it necessary to describe temporary construction works, either as part of the authorised development, or as associated development? Should the AGI and National Transmission System connection be... Read more

  • View advice to npower

    Is it necessary to describe temporary construction works, either as part of the authorised development, or as associated development? Should the AGI and National Transmission System connection be... Read more

  • View advice to Hugh Morris RWE

    Please see correspondence of 13.09.2011 attached.

  • View meeting with RWEnpower

    Could the IPC provide advice on transferring the benefits of the order

  • View meeting with RWEnpower

    Query regarding associated development

  • View meeting with RWE Npower

    RWE Npower enquired what the implications would be of a failure to reach agreement on acquiring statutory undertakers' (SU) land prior to submission of an application to the IPC.

  • View advice to RWE Npower

    I wish to raise a further question regarding the discharging of requirements before I have further discussions with the local planning authorities. In order that I can brief the LPA correctly, can... Read more

  • View meeting with East Staffordshire BC

    Meeting held to enable RWE Npower to provide an update on the project and for the IPC to explain the 2008 Planning Act process, focussing particularly on the role of the Local Authority.

  • View meeting with RWE Npower

    Meeting to provide update on the project and discuss the draft Development Consent Order (DCO)

  • View advice to RWE Npower

    EUPS We reviewed the draft requirements found in Schedule 4 of the Model Provisions. Regarding Requirement 34 'European Protected Species', NE commented that following the Cheshire East ruling, this... Read more

  • View meeting with RWE npower

    An update on the project?s progress and to discuss the following: ? Landowner consents ? Strategy documents ? Consultation & correspondence reports ? Consultation program 2011 ? The draft DCO... Read more

  • View meeting with RWEnpower

    1. Can unilateral undertakings also be taken into account as part of the examination process? 2. In relation to the Book of Reference is there a preferred format for the Book of Reference and what... Read more

  • View meeting with RWEnpower

    1. Can submit certain reports which relate to protected species marked as confidential? 2. Request for an update on where the DCLG is currently at with their review of the Fees Regulations and... Read more

  • View advice to RWE Npower

    We intend to carry out a repeat of the Phase 1 consultation, consulting all the parties on the Prescribed Consultee list that was supplied to us with the IPC's scoping opinion on August 2nd. ... Read more

  • View advice to RWEnpower

    Yesterday, we met with representatives from Derbyshire CC's Highway department. We discussed the agreement of the requirements and how the discharging will work, with details being agreed with the... Read more

  • View advice to RWE npower

    at our last IPC meeting we discussed the fact that our Phase 1 consultee list differed from that provided by the IPC with the scoping report. We compiled the consultee list and submitted this as a... Read more

  • View advice to RWE Npower

    If an applicant is unable to identify the ownership and/or occupation of land by diligent and reasonable enquiry, is there provision under Planning Act legislation to obtain rights to survey the land... Read more

  • View advice to RWE npower

    RWE npower have identified approx 20 landowners who have to date refused to grant access for non-intrusive surveys, including environmental and ecological surveys. We are able to demonstrate that we... Read more

  • View advice to RWE npower

    If a developer is unable to identify the ownership and/or occupation of land by diligent and reasonable enquiry, is there provision under Planning Act legislation to obtain rights to survey the land... Read more

  • View meeting with RWE npower

    Meeting to discuss progress by RWE npower towards making an application to the IPC.

  • View advice to Barton-under-needwood PC

    Mr Sharkey requested information on pre-application Commisioners and their role within the pre-application stage. Further information was sought on the scoping opinion adoption and publication dates... Read more

  • View advice to Hoar Cross Parish Council

    Mr Hulse called requesting information on why Hoar Cross Parish Council have been consulted upon regarding the proposed Gas transporter pipe line at Willington. He also requested a map to be sent to... Read more

  • View advice to RWE npower

    We have undertaken one to one visits of Persons with Interests in Land (PiLs) within the 200m corridor that is being investigated. There are a number of people within the corridor that have refused to... Read more

  • View advice to RWE Npower

    Does S53 (2) (c) mean that rights of entry for survey cannot be granted until we have carried out a formal consultation with the statutory consultees, (S42 (a)) local authorities (S42 (b) and S43) and... Read more