Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Heysham to M6 Link Road

Section 51 advice

The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.

There is a statutory duty, under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008, around an application or potential application. This includes recording the name of the person who requested advice and the advice given. This information has to be made publicly available.

Search advice

Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.

Showing 1 to 26 of 26 documents, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | View 50 results per page | 100

  • View advice to Mark Sullivan

    Enquiry and question rgerading Rule 4 and Rule 6 Letters issued in March 2012.

    Enquiry from: Mark Sullivan
    Date advice given: 13 September 2012

  • View advice to John Whitelegg

    E-mail from Prof. Whitelegg regarding the Issue Specific Hearings

    Enquiry from: John Whitelegg
    Date advice given: 2 July 2012

  • View advice to Mark Sullivan

    If possible wishes to be sent a transcript of the preliminary meeting that may have been made.

    Enquiry from: Mark Sullivan
    Date advice given: 28 May 2012

  • View advice to David Gate

    Mr David Gate, preparing his written representation, which will refer to evidence of traffic counts, wishes to submit this evidence after the deadline of the 8th as it may not be ready in time.

    Enquiry from: David Gate
    Date advice given: 3 May 2012

  • View advice to SJ Kenworthy

    Call from Mrs Kenworthy wishing to discuss a matter with the Rule 8 letter

    Enquiry from: SJ Kenworthy
    Date advice given: 30 April 2012

  • View meeting with Tim Hamilton-Cox

    At the IPC Outreach event held in Lancaster, a stakeholder asked whether the Commission would test for 'value for money' with regard to the Heysham to M6 Link Road application. The IPC's reply was ... Read more

    Meeting with: Tim Hamilton-Cox
    Date of meeting: 8 March 2012

  • View advice to CPRE

    A member of Campaign to Protect Rural England contacted the IPC via email, asking whether the promoter of the application was required to submit an Economic Impact Report to the IPC as part of the app... Read more

    Enquiry from: CPRE
    Date advice given: 10 February 2012

  • View advice to Alan James

    I have an immediate concern with the acceptance of HM6L as a NSIP. I can find nothing in the IPC statement accepting the application that gives the reason(s) why the IPC considers HM6L to be a NSIP, ... Read more

    Enquiry from: Alan James
    Date advice given: 9 February 2012

  • View advice to Health Protection Agency

    The IPC was made aware of a communication between the Promoter and the HPA (Health Protection Agency) regarding the HPA's status as a statutory consultee.

    Enquiry from: Health Protection Agency
    Date advice given: 19 January 2012

  • View advice to M Dickinson

    A stakeholder requested the name(s) of the Commissioner(s) appointed to handle the Heysham to M6 Link Road application, currently at pre-examination. The reply from the IPC was by email.

    Enquiry from: M Dickinson
    Date advice given: 13 January 2012

  • View advice to Michael Dickinson

    Mr Dickinson called to ask how long the registration period will last for if the application is accepted.

    Enquiry from: Michael Dickinson
    Date advice given: 7 December 2011

  • View advice to David Hodcroft

    To whom it may concern, can you possibly help, I am trying to gather information on the number and type of applications to the IPC where Local Authorities in Greater Manchester have been consulted sin... Read more

    Enquiry from: David Hodcroft
    Date advice given: 22 November 2011

  • View advice to Mike Dickinson

    The IPC received a telephone enquiry from a stakeholder in regard to the Heysham to M6 Link Road proposal currently at the pre-application stage, asking if Morecambe Town Council would be registered a... Read more

    Enquiry from: Mike Dickinson
    Date advice given: 27 October 2011

  • View meeting with Lancashire County Council

    Update on the timetable for submission of the application and project update.

    Meeting with: Lancashire County Council
    Date of meeting: 26 October 2011

  • View advice to Lancashire County Council

    Was asking about the intention of the section in Advice Note 14 under the heading of EIA Regulations consultation.

    Enquiry from: Lancashire County Council
    Date advice given: 24 October 2011

  • View advice to Lancashire County Council

    Lancashire County Council (promoter) requested comments from the Commission on specific draft documents for the proposed Heysham to M6 Link Road, currently at pre-application, that were sent to the IP... Read more

    Enquiry from: Lancashire County Council
    Date advice given: 20 October 2011

  • View advice to Transport Solutions for L&M

    Transport Solutions for Lancaster & Morecombe wrote to the IPC seeking clarification on a section of the note for the meeting on 17 August 2011 that was held between the IPC case team, Lancashire Coun... Read more

    Enquiry from: Transport Solutions for L&M
    Date advice given: 18 October 2011

  • View advice to Halton Group of Residents

    A member writing on behalf of the Group of Halton Residents contacted the IPC by letter, commenting on the scope of pre-application consultation work undertaken for the proposed Heysham to M6 Link Roa... Read more

    Enquiry from: Halton Group of Residents
    Date advice given: 18 October 2011

  • View meeting with Lancaster County Council

    Inception meeting with Lancashire County Council and Lancaster City Council to discuss the role of the Local Authorities in the application process, in particular the final parts of the pre-applicatio... Read more

    Meeting with: Lancaster County Council
    Date of meeting: 17 August 2011

  • View advice to Rod Cartner

    Lancashire County Council have indicated that ONLY issues relating to the proposed scheme as it now stands can be considered, but another source (a letter in the local newspaper [ Lancaster Guardian])... Read more

    Enquiry from: Rod Cartner
    Date advice given: 12 July 2011

  • View advice to Lancaster City Council

    Cllr Marsland offered reasons for his objection to the proposed development.

    Enquiry from: Lancaster City Council
    Date advice given: 30 June 2011

  • View meeting with Lancashire County Council

    To visit the site of the proposed Heysham to M6 link.

    Meeting with: Lancashire County Council
    Date of meeting: 24 June 2011

  • View advice to C Benson

    I am writing to inform you of my objections / comments on the Heysham to M6 link; My objections are that this link road will not deliver economic benefit to the local area, of the 3000 constructio... Read more

    Enquiry from: C Benson
    Date advice given: 1 June 2011

  • View advice to Derek Kaye

    I received a leaflet/booklet through my door called "The Link" about this project, I think from Lancashire county council, and on the back page it said: You can only register after the IPC have acc... Read more

    Enquiry from: Derek Kaye
    Date advice given: 29 May 2011

  • View meeting with Lancashire County Council

    To visit the site of the proposed Heysham to M6 link.

    Meeting with: Lancashire County Council
    Date of meeting: 27 April 2011

  • View meeting with Lancashire County Council

    Introductory meeting with LCC and LC regarding a proposed highways scheme in Lancashire and to explain the IPC process and discuss the need for any outreach.

    Meeting with: Lancashire County Council
    Date of meeting: 22 March 2011