Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
PHE considers that the public health impacts likely to arise from the impact of the development on air, land and water have been adequately considered in the related sections of the...
Read more
-
1. Any major disturbance of any part of an historic landscape is unacceptable.
2. Land could be resumed somewhere "over the hills and far away" to build a by-pass road, so...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the destruction of important archaeological information and finds associated with the area, and the unrepairable damage to the site which has World Heritage Status. Also rare bird...
Read more
-
The proposed scheme will cause irreparable harm to the WHS and destroy its archaeology. No sane person can consider this to be acceptable.
-
It's ridiculous to spend so much money on a tunnel, yes the traffic is terrible but there has to be less costly options on the table. I understand it is going to be. very difficult to come up with a...
Read more
-
Mr Robert Turner of Manor Farm, Winterbourne Stoke.
DCO Registration of Interested Parties.
I wish to make full written and oral representations on many aspects of the scheme (an outline of...
Read more
-
I object to a dual carriageway running beside Stonehenge as I feel it would destroy the significance of the historical value of the site.
-
Dear sir/madam,
Please keep Stonehenge intact as it is now. An expressway could damage the site because of the vibrations of constructing it and from the cars especially the heavy ones.. And the view...
Read more
-
I object to the plans for a main road very close to Stonehenge because, in digging the foundations of that road, irreparable damage will be done to any archaeological remains which are below the...
Read more
-
We - Astronumerical Druid Order ADO and Sacred Grove Western Isles SGWI, OBJECT to this DCO Planning Application.
REASONS FOR OBJECTION
Viability / Judicial Review.
The Treasury, National...
Read more
-
I strongly feel that the proposals relating to the above scheme are wholly inappropriate for the landscape through which the road will be cutting. Whilst the scheme threatens to irreparably damage the...
Read more
-
It will irreparably damage the archeology of the World Heritage Site
-
I am concerned about the proposal as I think it will destroy this World Heritage Site. It is irreplaceable and is still giving archaeologists information. I also understand that rare birds will be...
Read more
-
I am against the proposed new highway as I believe it will be very damaging to this extremely important site and once spoilt it will be spoilt forever.
UNESCO advisers are quite rightly against this...
Read more
-
1) The build is environmentally sound in relation to the river Till.
2) The realigned cross roads at Rollestone are constructed and open before any other works commence – reason to minimise on the...
Read more
-
The plan to turn the A303 into a under ground dual carriageway that runs close to the Stonehenge site has many flaws. It is ridiculously expensive and cannot give value for money in terms of a return...
Read more
-
I'm very concerned that this tunnel, as proposed, could damage this World Heritage Site and disturb the land.
It's just to risky!
There must be a better way to improve traffic flow.
-
I am very concerned about the proposals for the A303 at Stonehenge because I feel that the construction of such a dual carriageway and tunnel will do irreversible damage to the landscape of the area,...
Read more
-
I am opposed to the loss of one of our most precious cultural assets and its view when I travel along the A303. The stones are the only ones in the world and irreparable damage to the WHS, and its...
Read more
-
Do not do this... Stonehenge was built for a purpose. In alignment with planets and stars also tied to energies within the earth. This place is sacred. Would you bury underneath a cathedral? The...
Read more
-
CPRE Wiltshire Branch objects to the A303 Preferred Route and proposed alterations as an individual charity and as a supporter of the Stonehenge Alliance of NGOs. Our objections, supported by CPRE...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is one of the worlds most recognisable and iconic heritage sites and its setting and landscape are integral to its appreciation. The proposed development would severely impact its setting...
Read more
-
The proposed tunnel roadworks poses a significant threat to the precious cultural heritage of the area and will be detrimental to the aesthetic, cultural and historical values found in the area. I am...
Read more
-
I am very concerned to hear about the proposed expressway on Stonehenge. IT is very disrespectful to the UNESCO international advisors and to thousands of pagans across the country, which place great...
Read more
-
A tunnel is a terrible idea. Not only could you be unwittingly destroying archeological treasures; you would be denying the majority of people who are not rich the iconic sight of the stones in their...
Read more