Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I am horrified that the proposed roadworks will destroy so much precious archaeology of international importance. Going ahead risks loosing the World Heritage status. It is a unique landscape and...
Read more
-
Please be mindful that future generations MUST have access to all the archaeological material in and underneath stone henge.......,without us having disrupted the area.
Also Stonehenge is an area of...
Read more
-
My representation relates solely to the proposed changes to public rights of way. There should be no discrimination, i.e. no user group should be favoured above another.
In particular, there should...
Read more
-
I am against the proposed scheme in the application. Stonehenge and the area around it are such important parts of our universal world heritage, and there is still so much unknown and undiscovered in...
Read more
-
I believe the site of Stonehenge is a priceless archaeological and spiritual national treasure that should never be damaged by any civil engineering 'road works' of any sort - underground or...
Read more
-
I consider that it is vital for several reasons that this scheme, to upgrade the Stonehenge Section of the A303 & additionally providing a bypass for Winterbourne Stoke,goes ahead without further...
Read more
-
Dear Madam/Sir,
Having travelled along the A303 many times in the past and on a regular basis, I cannot agree to having this area of haunting beauty destroyed even more than it is already.
The...
Read more
-
My main objection to the proposal is that both portals to the tunnel are inside the World Heritage Site. This is particularly damaging in the case of the Western portal. Furthermore, in my view...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the planned route and the way the road will be built, with too short a tunnel and a flyover that will be visible for miles around, will be:
detrimental to the site,
...
Read more
-
As a member of the (admittedly fictitious) rock band Spinal Tap, whose performance of the song "Stonehenge" has become internationally known, I have an emotional connection to the place, to its...
Read more
-
Points that I might include on My Representation are as follows:
1. The cost of the project
2. The requirement for the project.
3. The potential damage to the environment.
-
The application is flawed as it proposes a short tunnel (only c3 km) which will mean that both the east and west portals will still be inside the the World Heritage site (WHS) area.This will cause...
Read more
-
I strongly support the Amesbury to Berwick Down dualling and tunnel. The designers have gone a long way to fit the scheme into the sensitive landscape. I like the green bridges and the landscaping...
Read more
-
I would like to say that the plan I have seen online for the proposed new road and tunnel look as if they are very close to the Stonehenge Monument. This may impact the ancient site in terms of look...
Read more
-
My concerns, and my Written Representation, regarding the A303 Stonehenge development, center around the historical, cultural and scientific value of the site.
I trust this is an adequate summary to...
Read more
-
No further damage should be done to the archaeological landscape of Stonehenge.
Future generations would be appalled at those who decided that road widening should be at the expense of England’s most...
Read more
-
I strongly object to the proposed tunnel project at Stonehenge, on the basis that it will negatively impact - and possibly affect - the sites' World Heritage status, and also due to the fact that the...
Read more
-
As a citizen of this nation, an historian, an environmentalist and a Druid, I fundamentally object to the plans to bulldoze a new road and tunnel right through the heart of the Stonehenge World...
Read more
-
i dont agree that all options have been considered for the protection of the world heritage site. the tunnel is not long enough and thus the deep cuttings at the openings at either end of the tunnel...
Read more
-
The Stonehenge site and surrounding area is sacred, on the ground, above the ground and below the ground. The tunnel and traffic would destroy the profound link with the spiritual realm. It is...
Read more
-
1. Project violates Article 4 and Article 6.3 of the 1972 UNESCO World Heritage Convention
2. The OUV of the WHS cannot be taken in parts. Damage in one area cannot be offset by improvements...
Read more
-
As an interested member of the public who, under jurisdiction of English heritage should have free access to this and all other listed ancient monuments
-
I started the STAG campaign to dual the A303 past Stonehenge because this section of the road is no longer fit for purpose. A petition was presented to parliament in 2014 to this effect via...
Read more
-
Why spoil this scheme with a tunnel that is far too short. Come on - think long term instead of always trying to save a few pounds! This is a unique world heritage site and needs a holistic approach...
Read more
-
I would like to register as an Interested Party.
My concerns include:
• Impact of Countess Roundabout flyover, including visual, traffic noise & on our property value.
• Noise, vibration, water...
Read more
-
I wish to express my concerns at the damage that these proposed works are likely to do to the historic landscape in which stonehenge sits. The decision that has been made to give priority to the...
Read more
-
The well-being of Stonehenge Heritage Landscape. My concern, my valid point l want to make! To say about this new planning project, make way for a new road, tunnel etc. At my discretion, looking at of...
Read more
-
destruction of ancient site. loss of archaeologically important ground for the future. poor decision to have a short tunnel which will be visible to many visiting the heritage area.destruction of...
Read more
-
I wish to oppose the application 9in summary) on grounds of it being (a) a non-strategic road solution to localised and intermittent congestion and therefore unnecessary (b) cost, and (c) the...
Read more
-
I support the proposal. I have homes both in Devon and London and travel regularly between them by road on the A303 - including the element near Stonehenge. This proposal will significantly improve...
Read more
-
The tunnel does not free the WHS of traffic.
It is not cost effective.Especially if World Heritage status is lost.
It does not improve the traveller experience or safety.
It does not provide a...
Read more
-
I live a few miles off the A303 and use the road to London regularly. I am keen to see the Stonehenge tunnel built and the concrete bed three-lane road with the flip-flop of an overtaking lane...
Read more
-
As Chairman of Berwick Parish Meetings I am registering on behalf of the parish of Berwick St James
The Parish of Berwick St James fully supports the Stonehenge to Berwick Down A303 project as...
Read more
-
I would like to object to the scheme as it will cause huge damage to the Stonehenge World Heritage Site (WHS) and its archaeology from around a mile of expanded new road (dual carriageway and slip...
Read more
-
objecting to the need for the project,especially tunnel, distruction of sensitive landscape and environment, and possible archeology. Damage to a world heritage site caused by this project.
-
I own a field west of Winterbourne Stoke on which the proposed bypass will be built and as a result my field will halve in size.
The proposed design leaves my remaining land surrounded by public...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the impact of the works on our business , Stonehenge Campsite ltd and then the impact on our business, moving forward.
I want to ensure that our visitors can easily access the...
Read more
-
I am concerned about damage to the WHS and its archaeology . It is a place of pilgrimage for many and must remain unspoilt as possible.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go...
Read more
-
There are many reasons why the plans are an appalling idea, including:
- it will damage the site - both visible and non-visible
- it will detract from the tourist revenue
- UNESCO have recommended...
Read more
-
For my whole life, I have known Stonehenge. It is a beacon for me as I drive past. It is the emblem of my homeland. When I am abroad [Redacted] I dream of home, and Stonehenge is what I dream of. My...
Read more
-
1. Stonehenge is a site of International importance and designated by UNESCO as such.
2. Stonehenge and its wider environs are of International importance as recognised as such by UNESCO
3....
Read more
-
Detrimental to the uk and its heritage.
-
Stonehenge and its surrounds are not only historically incredibly important, but also one of the most loved and visited attractions on earth. This should mean that protecting the entire are should be...
Read more
-
Any works of this nature this close to a site as important as this will cause irreparable and catastrophic damage to the area. With an ancient monument the phrase“ long term solution “ must take on a...
Read more
-
Don't desecrate Stonhenge with this destruction of heritage for future generations.
-
Irreparable damage will be caused to this World Heritage Site, effecting its archaeology and setting as described by UNESCO ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme...
Read more
-
I am concerned that in a very short space of time the modern British people will desecrate sacred sites of world heritage value, that have existed for a very long time.
I ask that a better...
Read more
-
I cannot believe that any government will ignore the history of our land to speed travel!
As a Wiltshire born this monument has been my personal history. To put this enigmatic prehistoric monument at...
Read more
-
As a keen amateur archaeologist I am saddened and appalled at the irreversible damage that this scheme will cause. I have been visiting this landscape and have lived nearby for my whole life and find...
Read more
-
Once destroyed things can never be recreated. Already some damage has done.
Why is the car given the status of superiority over our historical heritage. There are other ways to solve the problem/