Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
The site of Stonehenge is much larger than the site of the standing stones. So much of its processional route had already been destroyed by modern farming and other methods.
It is an essential...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned about the potential damage to this iconic World Heritage Site, including its archaeology and setting. UNESCO have described the World Heritage property Stonehenge, Avebury and...
Read more
-
My representation is that I am a layperson unconnected geographically to the area, but who disagrees with the proposals in the strongest terms.
-
The flyover over the countess roundabout will be unsightly, cause noise pollution to the residents of Amesbury and put Blickmead at further risk
-
I have to object to this idea: Stonehenge is a World Heritage site of phenomenal archaeological importance, this scheme will likely cause damage. It may restrict or prevent visiting and may thus also...
Read more
-
The stones are connected to the land, the land needs to stay connected to the earth which means directly beneath the stones, so nothing must be taken away from the ground underneath the stones, nor...
Read more
-
It is my understanding from learned historians, archaeologists and UNESCO that this proposal risks irreparable damage to England’s most important Neolithic site. And for what? We need to reduce our...
Read more
-
I object to the damage which will be inflicted on the WHS.
I object to disturbance of rare and declining bird species.
I object to the alteration in visual access to the stones
-
The site - and area around it - is of global importance and should be protected and not damaged.
Consultation with the public has been inadequate.
Traffic issues have been grossly exaggerated....
Read more
-
The benefits of the site in terms of tourism, national and international ethos, aesthetic appeal, archaeological and historical importance, continuing cultural significance, heritage, and...
Read more
-
The proposed plans will ensure the unnecessary and careless destruction of one of Britain's most significant archaeological sites, and much of the material there has yet to be properly excavated and...
Read more
-
I object to the likely damage to an archaeological site of immense significance, against which many experts from UNESCO down have warned.
-
Losing the view of this icon from the road would be a great shame. It has always a highlight to see. UNESCO advise against the scheme in its current form, due to irreparable damage to the archaeology...
Read more
-
Damage to a world heritage site and disruption to archaeological remains.
-
I have concerns about the possible impact that these plans may have on the countryside.
-
To build a tunnel directly under Stonehenge contravenes the special qualities of this ancient site. It is an energetic site of national importance with unique qualities which should be retained...
Read more
-
Hiding Stonehenge with a tunnel is not an exceptable reason to spend this obscene amount of money on it. Such a small project that does not need this amount of money spent on it to widen the road, It...
Read more
-
I think the plan is an grave mistake as it will make irreparable damage to wildlife and the ancient Monoliths there. UNESCO have not approved this and there has been no consideration for the ruination...
Read more
-
This is not only a proposal of destruction with possible catastrophic consequences for our heritage and future generations it is also an unbelievable waste of public money and resources. There is...
Read more
-
That a tunnel under Stonehenge is a big mistake. We have no long term knowledge of how this wpuld affect this site and it is far too important a site to risk in this way.
-
As a local who grew up around Stonehenge, I wish to register my objection to this scheme. It will inevitably cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site - it goes against the advice of UNESCO,...
Read more
-
Submission by Amesbury Museum and Heritage Trust
I write in my capacity as chairman of the board of trustees of the Amesbury Museum and Heritage Trust, a charity whose objects include “the...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an internationally known tourist and World Heritage Site. The proposed tunnel would likely damage it, which could in turn cause tourist numbers to drop. This would also be bad for the...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the following points:
It goes against UENESCO advice.
It will damage neighbouring sites of historical interest.
The consultation did not include less-damaging options.
Further...
Read more
-
This scheme will destroy an archeological site of global importance forever.
Already exploratory drilling has destroyed unique fossil footprints.
It is easy enough to go round Stonehenge when...
Read more