Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Firstly, any work near the site of Stonehenge would seriously interfere with the ambiance of this world heritage site that millions of people come from across the world to visit.
Secondly work with...
Read more
-
Project Allenby Connaught (PAC) is an MOD PFI with Aspire for the Garrisons on Salisbury Plain (Tidworth, Larkhill, Bulford). The Garrisons electricity supply is taken from the National Grid at...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is one of the wonders of the world and it is in our country. Do not spoil this amazing architectural wonder, leave it for furture generations to view and experience in all its glory.
-
Rescue is a non-political organisation dedicated to supporting archaeology. We receive no state support and are entirely dependent on the contributions of our members to support our work. We have been...
Read more
-
Damage has already occurred to Blick Mead site during an exploratory examination. It's only likely that more damage will happen in furthering this tunneling. Surely a dual carriageway alongside the...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
-
I am concerned that this site of national importance is being threatened
-
A massive flyover yards from my property will devalue it and my quality of life greatly. Also damage to Blick Mead is totally unacceptable.
-
I am extremely concerned about the irreparable harm that will be caused to a unique site, recognised by UNESCO as a World Heritage Site. This site, which includes the whole of the surrounding area,...
Read more
-
I believe the proposed development will irreversibly spoil the sacred nature of Stone Henge.
I also believe the UK is at a population and infrastructure saturation point and our relatively small...
Read more
-
The proposals will cause irremediable damage to the archaeological landscape of the Stonehenge WHS and its setting. This landscape has been described by UNESCO as a 'landscape without parallel'. ...
Read more
-
This plan is vexatious as it damages part of a national heritage site and puts our sacred landscape at risk.
-
Stonehenge is a UNESCO World Heritage Site and should be protected from the dual carriageway that has been proposed to be built around it.
HIGHWAYS ENGLAND SHOULD SCRAP THIS IDEA NOW AND RESPECT OUR...
Read more
-
I strongly object to the proposal for the tunnel. I believe it will cause irrepairable harm to this extremely important world heritage site, indeed it has already damaged important archeology with...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is the whole area and it's landscape and environs. Wanton destruction of this should be a criminal act
-
Fao Highways England re project A303 STONEHENGE
Cancel this scheme immediately and preserve a UNESCO World Heritage Site from traffic pollution and noise.
OUR ANCIENT HERITAGE IS AT STAKE
-
Unacceptable intervention in a world heritage site at odds with advice given by UNESCO
-
2 public consultations have overwhelmingly rejected the plans for the Stone Henge Highway yet you are pushing it through. At best this is undemocratic with going into any environmental & historical...
Read more
-
Damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form and if it...
Read more
-
Not only is the site important for Britain, it is a UNESCO world heritage site and as such should remain as is, the setting is as important as the stones themselves.
It is also an important site for...
Read more
-
I object to the current plans for the tunnel by Stonehenge. There has been inadequate protection given for the site with major archeological loss with the proposal as it stands. Any tunnel must be of...
Read more
-
As the proposal is so potentially damaging and that damage will be irreversible my main concern is that there is no alternative.
Until there is an Alternative to consider which does not endanger rare...
Read more
-
I u derstand that this new proposed tunnel will mean that the stones cannot be seen from the road, that “Tunner’s View” sketch of them, part of the UK’s cultural history & mystery will be gone...
Read more
-
I've been to sunrise at the henge near summer solstice. It's in our bones. Please do not trash it.
-
The cost is exhorbetent for the return at times of austerity we should not be financing cosmetic projects there will also be detrimental effects on the adjacent areas due to the digging etc and...
Read more
-
This road should not be built around this world heritage site and I am in opposition to it.
-
I object to the destructive impact of this road on a site of such historic importance. It will ruin this unique place forever by altering its appearance, driving away rare species of animals and...
Read more
-
The ‘Stonehenge Tunnel’ project would cause irreparable damage to a World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO’s international...
Read more
-
The proposed plan will cause irreparable damage to this WHS, and therefore UNESCO has stated that it should not be implemented in its present form.
The RSPB is concerned about the elimination of the...
Read more
-
I believe this road will cause damage to this amazing world heritage site. We are very lucky to have it and it should be protected for future generations
The site will no longer be able to be seen...
Read more
-
It is fact that the damage caused to ancient monuments by airborn chemicals is at an all time high. We have a duty to conserve this monument. Other options must be found. There is only one Stonehenge...
Read more
-
I have been and continue to be a regular traveller on the A 303.
I believe the short tunnel option as covered in the application is not the best solution to the A303 traffic bottle neck. I believe...
Read more
-
I am very concerned that the proposals will adversely affect the archaeology of the World Heritage Site and the surrounding landscape.
Likewise I am concerned that the proposals will result in damage...
Read more
-
I think it’s an absolute travesty you plan to destroy such a view with a tunnel that will wreck havoc on what is below the surrounding area it has not been taken into cionsideration. We the people...
Read more
-
I object to the damage to the setting, the flora and fauna and the archaeology that will be incurred to the World Heritage Site around Stonehenge by the work on this proposed new road.
I object to...
Read more
-
1.IMPACT ON HERITAGE ASSETS
Amesbury Abbey is a Grade I listed building, a heritage asset of the highest significance which will be permanently adversely affected by this development. The development...
Read more
-
This representation is made on behalf of The Amesbury Property Company Limited (APC) and Classmaxi Limited (CML) being owners of land which is to be acquired, or rights over which are to be acquired,...
Read more
-
I believe this site is of such significant international importance that the planned "improvements" will cause tragic, irreparable damage.
-
As a regular visitor to Stonehenge, I’m very concerned by the road proposals. It will cause lasting damage to the world heritage site and the archaeology. I note that UNESCO’s international advisers...
Read more
-
I believe the plans to build this road will irreparably damage this unique ancient monument stop this madness now.
-
I studied Archaeology and Anthropology for my undergraduate degree and specifically the Wiltshire Neolithic with particular focus on Avebury and Stonehenge WHSs. The plans as they stand appear to me...
Read more
-
This registration as an interested party is made by Archie Read MRICS, a qualified chartered surveyor, acting for and on behalf of Beacon Hill Land Limited, a Tier One landowner that has received a...
Read more
-
I feel the tunnel would destroy valuable archaeology in the direct and surrounding area and would also cost far too much.
-
I use the 303 to travel to London from my home in devon fairly regularly. I have travelled widely here and abroad . I have worked in construction . The idea of building a tunnel is preposterous . It...
Read more
-
Damage to world heritage site
Damage and loss to wildlife
Money could be spent better making roads we already have better, safer, cleaner..
-
1. Local traffic management must be in place during the construction phase of the A303 upgrade in order to minimise the impact of increased traffic through Chitterne on the B390.
2. Chitterne PC...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage Site of such importance to the British Isles, it would be unforgivable to damage it in any way. People come from all over the world to see it. Please reconsider any...
Read more
-
Stonehenge's iconic status must be safeguarded for future generations to enjoy. The proposed short tunnel route impinges within the world heritage site and will cause significant damage to the...
Read more
-
I write to express my indignation and astonishment that plans are afoot to put at risk such an iconic and precious UK heritage site as Stonehenge. It is known and revered world wide and regularly...
Read more
-
Please heed the will of history and the people who entreat you to save this historic site. We've not even begun to understand the significance of it's existence, and to bend to whims of money and...
Read more